Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Seeking asylum: Postmigratory stressors and asylum seeker distress.

By Gareth Morgan


1.1 Background: Despite growing recognition of the negative impact of ever stringent asylum employed by western governments, psychological conceptualisations of distress in these populations remains dominated by traumamodels.\ud 1.2 Literature Review: A systematic literature review was conducted to collate and critique findings from studies relating postmigratory stress to asylum seeker distress. The 44 reviewed studies suggested asylum seekers endure a range of postmigratory stressors relating to acculturative challenges, social isolation,\ud material deprivation and restrictive asylum legislation. Difficulties associated with\ud conducting research with these populations are acknowledged. It is concluded that\ud restrictive asylum policies greatly inhibit asylum seekers’ abilities to negotiate\ud challenges resulting from displacement. Smail’s (2005) social materialist\ud perspective is suggested as a framework for findings.\ud 1.3 Research Report: No known British empirical research has focused on exploring\ud relationships between postmigratory-stress and asylum seeker mental health. Based on established methodologies (e.g. Silove et al.,1997) a cross-sectional study was undertaken to explore the relative relationship with distress of postmigratory-stressors and premigratory-trauma exposure. An opportunity sample of 98 asylum seekers completed measures of postmigratory-stress (the PLDC: Silove et al., 1997); premigratory-trauma exposure (HTQ-TE; Mollica et al.,1992) and distress (HTQ-PTSD: Mollica et al.,1992; HSCL-25: Hesbacher et\ud al.,1980; Winokur et al.,1984). High levels of exposure to premigratory-traumatic\ud events, postmigratory stress, and distress were reported. Regression analyses revealed ‘Feeling a burden to others’ and being denied asylum to be the strongest\ud predictors of distress. It is concluded that a range of postmigratory stressors impact negatively on asylum seeker wellbeing. Those denied asylum experience more restrictions and poorer mental health. Limitations are acknowledged.\ud 1.4 Implications: The literature review and research report conclude that present asylum determination processes are damaging to those seeking refuge. Psychotherapeutic interventions directed at the intra-psychic level may be of limited effectiveness given the more primary social and material needs of these clients.\ud 1.5 Critical Appraisal: Reflections on the research process are presented alongside\ud key learning points

Topics: Asylum Seekers, Refugees, Postmigratory stress, Trauma, Community psychology
Publisher: University of Leicester
Year: 2008
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2006). A longitudinal study of PTSD in a sample of adult mass-evacuated kosovars, some of whom returned to their home country. doi
  2. (2005). A report of destitution in the asylum system in Leicester. Retrieved
  3. (2005). Acculturation: conceptual background and core components. doi
  4. (2005). An exploration of psychological well-being with young somali refugee and asylum-seeker women. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, doi
  5. (1951). Convention & protocol relating to the status of refugees. Retrieved doi
  6. (2003). Cross-cultural Construing. In doi
  7. (1997). Detaining asylum seekers: automatic independent judicial review would reduce unnecessary suffering.
  8. (2008). from ICAR Website:
  9. (2006). ICAR navigation guide. Key issues: UK asylum law and process.
  10. (2003). Mental health of Kosovan Albanian refugees in the UK. doi
  11. (2000). Migration and threat to identity. doi
  12. (2000). Psychological and economic adaptation of iraqi male refugees: Implications for social work practice. doi
  13. (2008). Psychological distress and the asylum process - A longitudinal study of forced migrants in ireland. doi
  14. (1999). Subjective well-being, discrimination and cultural conflict: Iranians living in the netherlands.
  15. (2002). The Cambridge handbook of acculturation psychology. doi
  16. (2003). The hopkins symptom checklist-25 in screening DSM-III-R axis-I disorders. doi
  17. (1999). The meaning and significance of caseness: The hopkins symptom checklist-25 and the composite international diagnostic interview II. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.