Location of Repository

The influence of societal culture on the implementation of Teacher appraisal at the AB School in Barbados.

By Albert Bartlett

Abstract

This study sought to determine the ways in which the societal culture of Barbados has\ud influenced the appraisal implementation process at the AB School; to test the model for describing societal culture proposed by Dimmock and Walker (2002) by applying it to\ud Barbados; to develop a methodology for investigating societal culture and to recommend ways to improve the appraisal implementation process at the AB school.\ud The study concentrated on the power distributed / concentrated dimension but also\ud involve the consideration / aggression dimension and the male/female influence\ud dimension. To apply the Dimmock and Walker model, the Barbadian society was divided\ud into three levels across which power has been distributed. These were represented by the Ministry of Education (MoE), the teachers’ unions and the school (after Morris and Lo, 2002).\ud Results showed that the MoE felt the scheme was a good balance between accountability\ud and professional development. The teachers’ unions argued against changes in working\ud conditions brought on by the appraisal. The staff of the AB school preferred an appraisal\ud scheme that had developmental components only. The staff felt that the present scheme\ud was too time-consuming in nature and that the busy exam preparation schedule the school\ud undergo on a yearly basis was unsuitable to successfully implement it at the school. The\ud appraisal came to a halt as a result of attitude of the staff at the AB school to it

Publisher: University of Leicester
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/4134

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2002). (2002a) ‘Educational Management: Theory and Practice’
  2. (2002). (2002a), ‘Embedding Societal Culture in the study of Educational Leadership’,
  3. A (eds.) (2001) Effective School and school improvement, searching for the elusive partnership,
  4. (2004). A Guide to New Staff
  5. (1991). A Paper presented at a Conference of the British Educational Research Association on "Appraising Appraisal",
  6. (1998). A paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the doi
  7. (2008). About us’ (http://www.bstu.org/bstu_page2.html) Online accessed
  8. (2001). Accord Reached’, Barbados Advocate,
  9. (2003). Action Research and Teacher Performance Appraisal’, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association
  10. (1999). Adding Values: The Role of LEA Appraisal Co-ordinators in the Implementation of Teacher Appraisal, doi
  11. (2002). Analysis of qualitative Data’,
  12. (1998). Appraisal/Supervision as a Rational Process with Teaching as its Central Focus’, in The Clearing House, doi
  13. (2007). Authenticity in research- Reliability, Validity and Triangulation’ doi
  14. (2002). Authenticity- Reliability, Validity and Triangulation’, doi
  15. (2002). Autonomy and Self Management: Concepts and Evidence’
  16. (1994). Beginning Qualitative Research: A Philosophical and Practical Guide, doi
  17. (2003). Bureaucratic Control or Professional Autonomy?: performance management in New Zealand schools’, doi
  18. (2002). Case Study Research’, doi
  19. (1995). Clinical Supervision: Conceptions perceptions and attitudes of teachers and supervisors in secondary schools in Barbados, Dept of Ed Admin, Fac. of Ed,
  20. (1979). Collins Dictionary of the English Language, London, Collins Harber and Davies,
  21. (1999). Combining Cultural and Political Perspectives: The best of both Conceptual Worlds’ doi
  22. (1994). Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research’.
  23. (1994). Coping with Incapability, Mendip Paper 51,
  24. (2007). Cross-cultural differences in interpreting and conducting research’
  25. (2002). Cross-cultural differences in interpreting and doing research’
  26. (1991). Cultural Constraints in Management Theory’, in International review of Strategic Management, doi
  27. Dimmock (eds.) (2002) School Leadership and Administration: adopting a Cultural Perspective, doi
  28. (2000). Editorial: headways for headteachers’ in IIEP Newsletter,
  29. (1992). Education Legislation Ministry of Education and Culture, Barbados MOEYAC
  30. (2002). Educational Change in Thailand: Opening a Window onto Leadership as Cultural Dimension’, doi
  31. (1998). Educational Leadership and Management: Context, Theory and Practice’, doi
  32. (2002). Educational Leadership: taking into Account of Complex Global and Cultural Contexts’,
  33. (1997). Effective Performance Appraisal, Aukland,
  34. (2007). Ethics of Research doi
  35. (1994). Evaluating Flexible Learning - A case Study doi
  36. (2002). Governance, Autonomy and Accountability in Education’ doi
  37. (1998). Human Resources management in Schools and College,
  38. (1994). Inspection, Evaluation and Quality Assurance’,
  39. (2000). Introduction- justifying a cross-cultural comparitive approach to school leadership and management’, doi
  40. (2002). Issues in the investigation of school leadership across cultures’
  41. (2002). Leadership and strategy’ doi
  42. (2003). Leadership in Learning Centred Schools: Cultural Context, Functions and Qualities’, doi
  43. (2002). Leadership, learning and the Challenge to Democracy: the Case of Hong Kong, the United kingdom and the United States
  44. (1992). Leading the Self-managing School, London, doi
  45. (2002). Learning and Teaching: a Cross-Cultural Perspective’ doi
  46. (1995). Levels of comparison in educational studies: different insights from different literature and values of multiple analysis’, doi
  47. (2001). Managing Change: A Middle Leader Perspective’,
  48. (2002). Managing for equal opportunities’ doi
  49. (1992). Managing Quality in Schools 2nd edition,
  50. (1989). Managing School Departments and Facilities: Towards a Better Practice’ doi
  51. (1995). Objectivity, Subjectivity, and Relativism: The Case for Qualitative Methodologies
  52. (2000). One Size Fits All? Teacher Appraisal in a Chinese Culture’, in Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education,
  53. (1999). Paradigms and Research Methods”, Research Methods Forum, Vol 4,
  54. (1998). Performance appraisal: principals' perspectives and some implications’ in doi
  55. (2000). Performance improvement in schools: a case of overdose?’ doi
  56. (1992). Qualitative research for Education: an Introduction to theory and Methods’
  57. (2002). Questionnaires’ doi
  58. (1993). Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientist and Practitioner-researchers, doi
  59. (2000). Research Methods Education, doi
  60. (1995). Research Methods in Education : An Introduction,
  61. (1998). Restructuring Hong Kong’s schools: the applicability of Western theories, policies and practices to an Asian culture’ doi
  62. (1998). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research’ doi
  63. (1995). School Culture, School Effectiveness and School Improvement’ in School Effectiveness and School Improvement, doi
  64. (2002). School Leadership and Administration: adopting a Cultural Perspective, doi
  65. (2002). School Leadership in Context- Societal and Organizational Cultures’
  66. (2002). School Leadership in English Schools, portrait, Puzzles and Identity’,
  67. (2001). School, Effectiveness and Improvement, a Political analysis’,
  68. (1991). Schoolteacher Appraisal: Reflections on Recent History, doi
  69. (2001). Sharing Leadership in School through Teamwork: a Justifiable risk?’ doi
  70. (1995). Staff Appraisal and the Statutory Scheme in England’, doi
  71. (1997). Teacher Appraisal in New Zealand: Beyond the Impossible, New Zealand, doi
  72. (1998). Teacher Perspectives on the Evaluation of Teachers” doi
  73. (2007). The New Meaning of Educational Change,
  74. (2000). The Opening of a New School: The Emergence of a Culture’, Conference Paper,
  75. (2002). The Policy Context’
  76. (2000). The relationship Between School Culture and IEPs’ in doi
  77. (1991). The role of appraisal in staff development’,
  78. (2001). The significance of teacher performance and its appraisal’ doi
  79. (2007). The trouble with Questionnaires’
  80. (1996). TQM and School restructuring: a case study’ doi
  81. (2002). Understanding Quality’
  82. (1996). Use of Teacher Perception in School Environment Research’, doi
  83. (2007). What do we mean by educational research?’

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.