Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Adjusting for founder relatedness in a linkage analysis using prior information

By Nuala A. Sheehan and Thore Egeland

Abstract

This is the final authors' version of the paper published as Human Heredity, 65 (4), pp. 221-231. The online published version can be accessed at http://content.karger.com/ProdukteDB/produkte.asp?Aktion=ShowAbstract&ArtikelNr=112369&Ausgabe=234215&ProduktNr=224250."This article is copyright protected. Any distribution without written consent from S. Karger AG, Basel is a violation of the copyright"

Publisher: Karger
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/3793

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1997). Accurate inference of relationships in sib-pair studies, doi
  2. (2005). Allegro version 2, doi
  3. (1999). Analysis of Human Genetic Linkage, third edn, The Johns Hopkins doi
  4. (1987). Analysis of parentage for naturally established seedlings of chamaelirium luteum (liliaceae), doi
  5. (2000). Beyond traditional paternity and identification cases. Selecting the most probable pedigree, doi
  6. (1996). Consanguinity and the sib-pair method: an approach using identity by descent between and within individuals,
  7. (2003). DNA-based methods for pedigree reconstruction and kinship analysis in natural populations, doi
  8. (2003). Estimation of the inbreeding coefficient through use of genomic data, doi
  9. (1981). Genealogical and Genetic Structure, doi
  10. (2006). Genetic relatedness analysis: modern data and new challenges, doi
  11. (2005). Handling marker-marker linkage disequilibrium: pedigree analysis with clustered markers, doi
  12. (1999). Historical genetics: the parentage of Chardonnay, Gamay and other wine grapes of northeastern France, doi
  13. (2005). Identifying nineteenth century links from genotypes, doi
  14. (2006). Ignoring distant genealogical loops leads to false-positives in homozygosity mapping, doi
  15. (2002). Impact of parental relationships in maximum lod score affected sib-pair method, doi
  16. (1976). Inference of genealogical structure, doi
  17. (2002). Merlin—rapid analysis of dense genetic maps using sparse gene flow trees, doi
  18. (2003). Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations, doi
  19. (2006). Modeling the effect of inbreeding among founders in linkage analysis, doi
  20. (2005). Molecular approaches to the study of parentage, relatedness, and fitness: practical applications for wild animals, doi
  21. (2000). Pitfalls in homozygosity mapping, doi
  22. (2006). Quantification of homozygosity in consanguineous individuals with autosomal recessive disease, doi
  23. (2002). Quantitative-trait homozygosity and association mapping, and empirical genomewide significance in large, complex pedigrees: fasting serum-insulin level in the Hutterites, doi
  24. (2000). Statistical test for detection of misspecified relationships by use of genome-screen data, doi
  25. (2007). Structured incorporation of prior information in relationship identification problems, doi
  26. (1975). The estimation of pairwise relationships, doi
  27. (2001). The importance of genealogy in determining genetic associations with complex traits, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.