Location of Repository

Zooarchaeology, improvement and the British agricultural revolution

By Richard M. Thomas

Abstract

This is the author's final draft of the paper published as International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 2005, 9(2), pp.71-88. The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com, doi:10.1007/s10761-005-8140-9This paper seeks to revisit the debate concerning the nature and timing of the British Agricultural Revolution. Specifically, it considers how zooarchaeological evidence can be employed to investigate later-medieval and post-medieval ‘improvements’ in animal husbandry. Previous studies of animal bone assemblages have indicated that the size of many domestic species in England increases from the 15th century - an observation that has been used to support the writings of those historians that have argued that the Agricultural Revolution occurred several centuries prior to the traditionally ascribed date of 1760-1840. Here, zooarchaeological data are presented which suggest that the size of cattle, sheep, pig and domestic fowl were increasing from as early as the 14th century. However, it is argued that the description of these changes as revolutionary is misleading and disguises the interplay of factors that influenced agricultural practice in the post-Black Death period. This paper concludes with a plea for greater awareness of the value of collecting and analysing faunal data from the 18th and 19th centuries to enable the historically-attested productivity increases of the traditionally dated Agricultural Revolution to be examined archaeologically

Publisher: Springer
Year: 2005
DOI identifier: 10.1007/s10761-005-8140-9
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/1407

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2003). A contribution to the morphometrical study of cattle in Colonial North America. doi
  2. (1976). A Guide to the Measurement of Animal Bones from Archaeological Sites, Peabody Museum Bulletin 1, doi
  3. (1957). A History of British Livestock Husbandry to 1700, Routledge and Kegan Paul, doi
  4. (1993). A new perspective on medieval and early modern agriculture: six centuries of Norfolk farming, doi
  5. (1992). A Rapid Method for Recording Information about Mammal Bones from Archaeological Sites, Ancient Monuments Laboratory report
  6. (1975). Absence of premolar teeth from ruminant mandibles found at archaeological sites. doi
  7. (1996). Agricultural Revolution in England: The Transformation of the Agrarian Economy 1500-1850, doi
  8. (1984). Agricultural revolution? Development of the agrarian economy in early modern England. In doi
  9. (1996). An Archaeology of Capitalism, doi
  10. (1969). An assessment of a Prehistoric technique of bovine husbandry.
  11. (1982). Animal and bird bones.
  12. (1988). Animal resources.
  13. (1990). Colyer’s Variations and Diseases of the Teeth of Animals, doi
  14. (1988). Components of variation in measurements of pig bones and teeth, and the use of measurements to distinguish wild from domestic pig remains,
  15. (1969). Dr. Kerridge’s “Agricultural Revolution”: a comment.
  16. (1984). Dudley Castle Archaeological Project - First Interim Report
  17. (1987). England’s Agricultural Regions and Agrarian History doi
  18. (1912). English Farming Past and Present, Longmans, doi
  19. (1991). Leicester, The Shires
  20. (2000). Mammal and Bird Bone Excavated 1997-8 from Dragon Hall,
  21. (1996). Mammals and birds from Launceston Castle, Cornwall: decline in status and the rise of agriculture.
  22. (1996). Measurements of a group of adult female Shetland sheep skeletons from a single flock: a baseline for zooarchaeologists. doi
  23. (1997). Medieval farming and technology: conclusion.
  24. (1966). Metrische Untersuchungen an Metapodien einiger Europäischer Rinderrasen, Unpublished dissertation,
  25. (1994). Morphometric data for cattle from North America and the Caribbean prior to the 1850s. doi
  26. (1987). Prudhoe Castle. A Report on the Animal Remains, Ancient Monuments Laboratory report 162/87,
  27. (1996). Re-establishing the English Agricultural Revolution.
  28. (2002). Size matters’: how and why biometry is still important in zooarchaeology.
  29. (1997). Size, power and veal: zooarchaeological evidence for late medieval innovations.
  30. (1990). The “Agricultural Revolution” of the Middle Ages Reconsidered.
  31. (1966). The Agricultural Revolution 1750-1880, doi
  32. (1997). The Agricultural Revolution in England: some zooarchaeological evidence. Anthropozoologica 25/26: 413-428. Agricultural Revolution. Dugdale Society Occasional Papers No. 27,
  33. (1969). The Agricultural Revolution reconsidered. doi
  34. (1967). The Agricultural Revolution, Allen and Unwin,
  35. (1990). The Agricultural Revolution, Basil Blackwood Ltd,
  36. (1979). The Animal Bones from Exeter 1971-1975, Exeter Archaeological Reports 2,
  37. (2000). The Archaeology of Animal Bones, doi
  38. (1986). The History of the Countryside: The Classic History of Britain’s Landscape, Flora and Fauna,
  39. (1985). The large mammals. doi
  40. (1995). The mammal bones.
  41. (1977). The Mammalian Remains from the Tudor site of Baynard’s Castle London. A Biometrical and Historical Analysis,
  42. (1969). The metrical attributes of two samples of bovine limb bones. doi
  43. (1994). The social origins of agrarian change in late medieval England. doi
  44. (2002). The Transformation of Rural England: Farming and the Landscape 1700-1870, doi
  45. (1991). The two English Agricultural Revolutions,
  46. (1999). The use of size index scaling techniques for research on archaeozoological collections from the Middle East.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.