Location of Repository

Intraobserver and interobserver variability in measuring changes in lesion volume on serial brain MR images in multiple sclerosis

By Massimo Filippi, Mark A. Horsfield, Marco Rovaris, T.A. Yousry, Maria A. Rocca, C. Baratti, S. Bressi and G. Comi

Abstract

This is an article published in American journal of Neuroradiology which is available on the website at http://www.ajnr.org/cgi/reprint/19/4/685PURPOSE: We evaluated the intraobserver and interobserver variability in measuring long-term changes in the volume of brain lesions on 5- and 3-mm-thick MR sections in patients with multiple sclerosis. METHODS: Eighteen 18 patients were scanned on two separate occasions with a mean interval of 16.4 months between the two examinations. In each session, a scan with 24 contiguous 5-mm-thick axial sections and another with 40 contiguous 3-mm-thick axial sections was acquired consecutively without moving the patient. We assessed MR lesion load by using a semiautomated local thresholding technique. RESULTS: Lesion volume was significantly higher on images with 3-mm-thick sections than on those with 5-mm-thick sections both at baseline and at follow up. Significant increases in total lesion volume were observed during the follow-up period on images obtained with both 5- and 3-mm-thick sections. The intra- and interobserver variability in measurements of changes in lesion volume was significantly higher on images with 5-mm-thick sections than on those with 3-mm-thick sections. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that the acquisition of thinner sections increases the reliability of the assessment of changes in brain lesion load on MR images in patients with multiple sclerosis

Publisher: American Society of Neuroradiology
Year: 1998
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/489

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. A high-resolution three- doi
  2. (1995). Changes in the amount of diseased white matter over time in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. doi
  3. (1997). Fast spin-echo and fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery versus conventional spin-echo sequences for MR quantification of multiple sclerosis lesions. doi
  4. (1994). Magnetic resonance imaging in monitoring the treatment of multiple sclerosis patients: statistical power of parallel-group and cross-over design. doi
  5. (1991). Magnetic resonance imaging in monitoring the treatment of multiple sclerosis: concerted action guidelines. doi
  6. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. doi
  7. (1996). Quantification of MRI lesion load in multiple sclerosis: a comparison of three computer-assisted techniques. Magn Reson Imaging doi
  8. (1995). Quantitative assessment of MRI lesion load in moni-toring the evolution of multiple sclerosis. doi
  9. (1996). Quantitative assessment of MRI lesion load in multiple sclerosis: a comparison of conventional spin-echo with fast-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery. doi
  10. Rating neurological impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). doi
  11. (1995). Resolution-dependent estimates of lesion volumes in magnetic resonance imaging studies of the brain in multiple sclerosis. doi
  12. (1997). Sensitivity and reproducibility of fast-FLAIR, FSE and TGSE sequences for the MRI assessment of brain lesion load in multiple sclerosis: a preliminary study. doi
  13. (1997). Strategies for optimizing MRI techniques aimed at monitoring disease activity in multiple sclerosis treatment trials. doi
  14. The National Multiple Sclerosis Society (USA) Advisory Board Committee on Clinical Trials of New Agents in Multiple Sclerosis. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: results of an international survey. doi
  15. (1997). The role of MRI in clinical trials of multiple sclerosis: comparison of image processing techniques. doi
  16. (1992). Using gadoliniumenhanced magnetic resonance imaging lesions to monitor disease activity in multiple sclerosis.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.