Location of Repository

Psychological evidence in court: Legal developments in England and the United States.

By Andrew M. Colman and R.D. Mackay

Abstract

This is the author's final draft. \ud The journal can be found online at\ud http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/1068316x.htmlPsychological testimony in England, except when it has dealt with clinical matters, has generally been ruled inadmissible on the grounds that it would usurp the function of the jury to decide matters of “common knowledge and experience”. The so-called Turner rule governing admissibility of psychological evidence has been interpreted according to a dubious assumption about the transparency of human behaviour, but this restrictive interpretation was rejected in a recent Court of Appeal decision, which should result in a more receptive attitude to psychological evidence. In the United States, the Frye test has been used to exclude psychological testimony unless it can be shown to have gained “general acceptance” in the field of psychology, but a recent United States Supreme Court decision has led to a more permissive approach in that jurisdiction also

Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Year: 1995
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/472

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1992). Attempts to limit the scope of the Frye standard for the admission Psychological Evidence 16 of scientific evidence: Confronting the real cost of the general acceptance test. doi
  2. (1991). Excluding expert evidence: A tale of ordinary folk and common experience. Criminal Law Review,
  3. (1992). Expert witnesses and sufficiency of evidence in toxic substances litigation: The legacy of Agent Orange and Bendectin litigation.
  4. (1975). Federal Rules of Evidence for United States Courts and Magistrates.
  5. (1901). Historical and practical considerations regarding expert testimony. doi
  6. (1993). Legal issues surrounding the admissibility of expert psychological and psychiatric testimony. In
  7. (1993). Motivated augmentation and reduction of the overattribution bias. doi
  8. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. doi
  9. (1992). Polygraph techniques: History, controversies, and prospects.
  10. (1995). Psychological evidence in court: Legal developments in England and the United States. doi
  11. (1992). Sally Lorraine Emery (and Another).
  12. (1981). Ten years of research on group size and helping. doi
  13. (1980). The admissibility of novel scientific evidence: Frye v. United States, a half-century later. doi
  14. (1990). The evolution of the American test for the admissibility of scientific evidence.
  15. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In doi
  16. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help? doi
  17. United States, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.