Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Crowd psychology in South African murder trials

By Andrew M. Colman

Abstract

'This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record.' http://www.apa.org/journals/amp/South African courts have recently accepted social psychological phenomena as extenuating factors in murder trials. In one important case, eight railway workers were convicted of murdering four strike-breakers during an industrial dispute; the court accepted conformity, obedience, group polarization, deindividuation, bystander apathy, and other well-established psychological phenomena as extenuating factors for four of the eight defendants but sentenced the others to death. In a second trial, death sentences on five defendants for the “necklace” killing of a young woman were reduced to 20 months’ imprisonment in the light of similar social psychological evidence. Practical and ethical issues arising from expert psychological testimony are discussed

Publisher: American Psychological Association
Year: 1991
OAI identifier: oai:lra.le.ac.uk:2381/467

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1989). 1). A nation dancing with death. The Independent,
  2. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation. doi
  3. (1963). A study of aspirations. doi
  4. (1977). Alternative approaches to deindividuation. doi
  5. (1990). Case No. 53/89, Supreme Court of South Africa, Eastern Cape Local Division.
  6. (1991). Crowd psychology in South African murder trials. doi
  7. (1966). Defiance of authority under peer influence.
  8. (1989). Deindividuation and extenuating circumstances:
  9. (1989). Extenuation: An unnecessary halfway house on the road to a rational sentencing policy.
  10. (1989). Frustration-aggression hypothesis: Examination and reformulation. doi
  11. (1986). Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. doi
  12. (1075). Helplessness: On depression, development, and death.
  13. (1989). Learned helplessness: Affective or cognitive disturbance? doi
  14. (1987). Motaung and Others,
  15. (1987). Obedience and cruelty: Are most people potential killers? In
  16. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. doi
  17. (1986). Relative deprivation and social justice: The Ontario symposium
  18. (1988). Safatsa and Others,
  19. (1960). Self-anchoring scaling: A measure of individuals’ unique reality worlds.
  20. (1987). Social comparison, social justice, and relative deprivation: Theoretical, empirical, and policy perspectives.
  21. (1984). Social influence model: A formal integration of research on majority and minority influence processes. doi
  22. (1952). Some consequences of deindividuation in a group. doi
  23. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. doi
  24. (1981). Ten years of research on group size and helping. doi
  25. (1988). Thabetha and Others,
  26. (1986). The ethics of expert testimony [Special issue].
  27. (1969). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order, vs deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. Nebraska Symposium on
  28. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In doi
  29. (1965). The pattern of human concerns. doi
  30. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help? doi
  31. (1980). Trial by data: Psychological research as legal evidence. doi
  32. (1970). Why men rebel. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.