Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Developing standards, criteria, and thresholds to assess fitness to practise

By Richard Baker


Also available from we need explicit, clear guidance on the professional behaviour of doctors or should guidance be largely implicit to account for the context and circumstances of clinical practice? In the aftermath of the Shipman case, doctors need to answer this question

Publisher: BMJ Publishing
Year: 2006
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2004). An experimental study of the determinants of group judgments in clinical guideline development. doi
  2. (2004). Association. Helsinki Declaration. doi
  3. (1994). Association. International code of medical ethics. doi
  4. (1998). Consensus development methods and their use in clinical guideline development.Health Technol Assess
  5. (2001). Council.Good medical practice. doi
  6. (2004). for Clinical Excellence.The guideline development process: an overview for stakeholders.
  7. (2006). for Health and Clinical Excellence. About the citizens council.
  8. Guidance: what role should consensus play in guideline development? In:
  9. (2004). On being a doctor. Redefining medical professionalism for better patient care. London: King’s Fund,
  10. (2002). Royal College of General Practitioners. Good medical practice for general practitioners. doi
  11. (2000). The handling of complaints by the GMC. A study of decision-making and outcomes. London: Policy Studies Institute,
  12. (2006). The Shipman Inquiry. Safeguarding patients: lessons from the past—proposals for the future. Fifth report. (accessed 9

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.