Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Where does good evidence come from?

By Stephen Gorard and Thomas Cook

Abstract

This paper started as a debate between the two authors. Both authors present a series of propositions about quality standards in education research. Cook’s propositions, as might be expected, concern the importance of experimental trials for establishing the security of causal evidence, but they also include some important practical and acceptable alternatives such as regression discontinuity analysis. Gorard’s propositions, again as might be expected, tend to place experimental trials within a larger mixed method sequence of research activities, treating them as important but without giving them primacy. The paper concludes with a synthesis of these ideas, summarising the many areas of agreement and clarifying the few areas of disagreement. The latter include what proportion of available research funds should be devoted to trials, how urgent the need for more trials is, and whether the call for more truly mixed methods work requires a major shift in the community

Topics: LB Theory and practice of education, H Social Sciences (General), L Education (General)
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Year: 2007
DOI identifier: 10.1080/17437270701614790
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.bham.ac.uk:599

Suggested articles


To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.