Article thumbnail

The parent version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: Omega as an alternative to alpha and a test for measurement invariance

By L.L. Stone, R. Otten, L. Ringlever, J.M. Hiemstra, R.C.M.E. Engels, A.A. Vermulst and J.M.A.M. Janssens


Item does not contain fulltextThe Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a widely used screening instrument for child psychopathology. Many studies have consistently reported rather low alpha values for certain subscales for the SDQ parent version. Further, the factor structure has not been tested frequently by using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA); research into measurement invariance is even scarcer. Therefore, this study evaluates the internal reliability and tests for measurement invariance for the SDQ parent version. In a Dutch sample of 1,484 children we examined reliability by using coefficient omega and tested for invariance across several subgroups. Also, we conducted CFA to examine the five-factor structure of the SDQ. omega yielded higher values than alpha did, which supports the use of omega in a SEM-based framework. Support for measurement invariance was found on the configural, metric, and scalar level, and as expected, the five-factor structure was confirmed. Scholars are advised to consider omega as an alternative to alpha, seeing that various problems with alpha have been discussed. Support for measurement invariance was found for several demographic variables, so that meaningful group comparisons can now be made for the SDQ parent version.7 p

Topics: Developmental Psychopathology
Publisher: 'Hogrefe Publishing Group'
Year: 2013
DOI identifier: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000119
OAI identifier:
Provided by: Radboud Repository
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • (external link)
  • (external link)

  • To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.

    Suggested articles