Article thumbnail

Can there ever be too many options? : a meta-analytic review of choice overload

By Benjamin Scheibehenne, Rainer Greifeneder and Peter M. Todd

Abstract

The choice overload hypothesis states that an increase in the number of options to choose from may lead to adverse consequences such as a decrease in the motivation to choose or the satisfaction with the finally chosen option. A number of studies found strong instances of choice overload in the lab and in the field, but others found no such effects or found that more choices may instead facilitate choice and increase satisfaction. In a meta-analysis of 63 conditions from 50 published and unpublished experiments (N p 5,036), we found a mean effect size of virtually zero but considerable variance between studies. While further analyses indicated several potentially important preconditions for choice overload, no sufficient conditions could be identified. However, some idiosyncratic moderators proposed in single studies may still explain when and why choice overload reliably occurs; we review these studies and identify possible directions for future research

Publisher: 'University of Chicago Press'
Year: 2010
DOI identifier: 10.1086/651235
OAI identifier: oai:edoc.unibas.ch:20586
Provided by: edoc

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance,
  2. (1991). Adapting Cut-offs to the Choice Environment: The Effects of Attribute Correlation and Reliability,”
  3. Alexnder (2003a), “Product Assortment and Individual Decision Processes,”
  4. (2008). An Experimental Test of the Choice Overload Hypothesis Using Chocolate,”
  5. (1975). and HowardL.Fromkin
  6. (1999). and the ABC Research Group
  7. (1981). Angela Megson, and Rachel Gunary
  8. (2001). Announcing a New Section in JCR:
  9. (1999). Assessing the Effects of Assortment and Ambience: A Choice Experimental Approach,”
  10. (2010). Be More When Choosing Is Difficult:
  11. (1974). Brand Choice Behavior as a Function of Information Load,”
  12. (1974). Brand Choice Behavior as a Function of Information Load: Replication and Extension,”
  13. (2008). Buy-Select and SelectBuy: The Influence of Sequential Decision Emphasis on Consumers’ Purchase Likelihood,” working paper,
  14. (2007). Buying Behavior as a Function of Parametric Variation
  15. (2007). Choice Overload and Option Quality,” unpublished raw data,
  16. (2006). Choice Set Size and Offer Frequency
  17. (1999). Choice-Process Satisfaction: The Influence of Attribute Alignability
  18. (1999). Choosing Less-Preferred Experiences for the Sake of Variety,”
  19. Chris (2006),TheLong Tail: WhytheFutureofBusiness Is Selling Less of More,
  20. (1994). Combining Estimates of Effect Size,”
  21. (1997). Consumer Preference for a No-Choice Option,”
  22. (1995). Consumer Variety-Seeking among Goods and Services: An Integrative Review,”
  23. (1998). Consumers’ Perceptions of the Assortment Offered in a Grocery Category: The Impact of Item Reduction,”
  24. (2008). Darf’s auch ein bisschen weniger sein? Der Einfluss von Einschra ¨nkung der Anzahl von Optionen auf den choice overload Effekt,” unpublished diploma thesis,
  25. (2003). Dealing with Too Much Choice,” unpublished dissertation,
  26. (2004). Decision Making in Information-Rich Environments: The Role of Information Structure,”
  27. (1968). Decision Time as a Function of the Number and
  28. (1983). Determinant Attributes in Retail Patronage:
  29. (2006). Doing Better but Feeling Worse—Looking for the ‘Best’ Job Undermines Satisfaction,”
  30. (1972). Elimination by Aspects: A Theory of
  31. (2007). Environments That Make Us Smart:
  32. Erica and Rik Pieters (2002), “The Variety of an Assortment: An Extension to the Attribute-Based Approach,”
  33. (2007). Escaping the Tyranny of Choice:
  34. (2008). Experiments on the Role of the Number of Alternatives
  35. (2006). Extending the Bounds of Rationality:
  36. Feature Complementarity and Assortment in
  37. (1951). Field Theory in Social Science,
  38. (2007). Great Expectations?! Assortment Size, Expectations and Satisfaction,” working paper,
  39. (2007). How (Not Who) Do We Choose? Choice-Related Affect and Strategy-Use
  40. (1998). How Many Discoveries Have Been Lost by
  41. (2004). How Much Choice Is Too Much?
  42. (1989). Information Overload and the Nonrobustness of Linear Models:
  43. Introduction to the Special Issue
  44. (1990). Invariants of Human Behavior,” Annual Review of
  45. (2009). Investigating the Dynamics of Choice Overload,” Psychology and Marketing,
  46. (2005). Is More Choice Always Desirable? Evidence and Arguments from Leks, Food Selection,
  47. (2003). John Buridan: Portrait of a FourteenthCentury Arts Master, Notre Dame, IN:
  48. Lipsey(1979),“ComparisonShopping and the Clustering of Homogeneous Firms,”
  49. (2008). Man, My Brain Is Tired: Linking Depletion and Cognitive Effort in
  50. (2002). Maximizing versus Satisficing: Happiness Is a
  51. (1995). Medical Decision Making in Situations That Offer Multiple Alternatives,”
  52. (2001). Meta-Analysis: Recent Developments
  53. (2006). MiMa: An S-Plus/R Function to Fit Meta-Analytic Mixed-, Random-, and Fixed-Effects Models,” computer software and manual, http://www.wvbauer .com/.
  54. (1991). Modeling Choice among
  55. (1984). Models of the Retail Location Process:
  56. (2005). More Choice Is Better: Effects of Assortment Size and Composition on Assortment Evaluation,”
  57. (2005). Overchoice and Assortment Type:
  58. (1956). Post-decision Changes in the Desirability of Choice Alternatives,”
  59. (2001). Practical MetaAnalysis,
  60. (1994). Random Effects Models,”
  61. (2001). Reducing Assortment: An Attribute-Based Approach,”
  62. (1984). Reflections on the Information Over-424
  63. (2006). Sa ´nchez-Meca, Fulgencio Marı ´nMartı ´nez, and Juan Botella
  64. (2009). Satisfaction in Choice as a Function of the Number of Alternatives:
  65. (2009). Searching for the Processes Underlying the Paradox of Choice,” working paper,
  66. (2000). Self-Determination: The Tyranny of Freedom,”
  67. (2008). Shopping’ for a Mate: Expected vs. Experienced Preferences in
  68. (2003). Smart Agents: When Lower Search Costs for Quality Information Increase Price Sensitivity,”
  69. (1963). Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd ed.,
  70. (1985). Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis,
  71. (1977). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences,
  72. (1993). The Adaptive Decision Maker: Effort and AccuracyinChoice, Cambridge:
  73. (1970). The Conflict of Buridan’s Ass or Some Dilemmas of Affluence: The Theory of Attractive Stimulus Overload,”
  74. (1966). The Consumer and His Alternatives: An Experimental Approach,”
  75. (2008). The Effect of Having Too Much Choice,” unpublished dissertation,
  76. (1990). The Effect of Purchase Quantity and Timing on Variety-Seeking Behavior,”
  77. (2006). The Effect of Variety on Consumer Preferences: The Role of Need for Cognition and Recommended Alternatives,” Social Behavior and Personality,
  78. (1993). The Impact of Task Complexity on Information Use in Multi-attribute Decision
  79. (1982). The Information Overload Controversy: An Alternative Viewpoint,”
  80. (2000). The Loss of Happiness in Market Economies,
  81. (2009). The Maximization Paradox: The Costs of Seeking Alternatives,” Personality and Individual Differences,
  82. (2008). The Mere Categorization Effect: How the Presence of Categories Increases
  83. (2004). The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less,N e w York: Harper Collins.
  84. (1994). The Process of Multiattribute Decision Making: A Case Study of Selecting Applicants for a Ph.D. Program,”
  85. (2003). The Psychology of Doing Nothing: Forms of Decision Avoidance Result from Reason and Emotion,”
  86. (2008). The Role of Purchase Quantity in Assortment Choice: The Quantity-Matching Heuristic,”
  87. (2006). The Short- and Long-Term Impact of an Assortment Reduction on Category Sales,”
  88. (1977). The Value of Unit Price
  89. Thompson (2002),“Quantifying Heterogeneity
  90. Todd (2009a), “The Influence of Assortment Size on the Probability to Invest in a Mutual Fund,” working paper,
  91. (1998). Variety for Sale: Mass Customization or Mass Confusion?”
  92. (2009). Variety, Vice, and Virtue: How Assortment Size Influences Option Choice,”
  93. (2008). Verhindert eine sequentielle Darbietung den Overload-Effekt einer breiten Produktpalette?” [Does a sequential presentation prohibit the overload effect?], unpublished data,
  94. (2000). When Choice Is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing?”
  95. (2008). When Is Too Much Choice Too Much to Handle?” poster presented at the 9th annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology,
  96. When More Is Less and Less Is More: The Role of Ideal Point Availability and Assortment in
  97. (2005). When Two Rights Make a Wrong: Searching Too Much in Ordered Environments,”
  98. (1998). Will Products Look More Attractive When Presented Separately or Together?”

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.