Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

From carbon markets to carbon morality: creative compounds as framing devices in online discourses on climate change mitigation

By Nelya Koteyko, Mike Thelwall and Brigitte Nerlich

Abstract

Lexical combinations of at least two roots around "carbon" as the hub, such as "carbon finance" or "carbon footprint," have recently become ubiquitous in English-speaking science, politics, and mass media. They are part of a new language evolving around the issue of climate change that can reveal how it is framed by various stakeholders. In this article, the authors study the role of these "carbon compounds" as tools of communication in different online discourses on climate change mitigation. By combining a quantitative analysis of their occurrences with a qualitative analysis of the contexts in which the compounds were used, the authors identify three clusters of compounds focused on finance, lifestyle, and attitudes and elucidate the communicative purposes to which they were put between the 1990s and the early 21st century. This approach may open up new ways of analyzing the framings of climate change mitigation initiatives in the public sphere

Publisher: Sage
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.nottingham.ac.uk:1264
Provided by: Nottingham ePrints

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2008). 2: Sociocultural situatedness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins,
  2. (2008). 2008’s year-long fall-off in climate coverage: Tracking the trends, and the reasons behind them.
  3. (2007). 25). Industry caught in carbon ‘smokescreen’. Financial Times.
  4. (2007). 25). Measuring the political temperature. Spiked online. Retrieved
  5. (2005). A Balkanized Blogosphere?
  6. (2009). A two-step flow of influence? Opinion-leader campaigns on climate change,
  7. (2005). adopts ‘green’ lending policies.
  8. (2008). Amid the financial storm: Redirecting climate change. Retrieved
  9. (2006). An inconvenient truth. doi
  10. (2005). AntConc: Design and development of a freeware corpus analysis toolkit for the technical writing classroom.
  11. (1997). article 9. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue2/thelwall.html UNFCCC
  12. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter to public engagement.
  13. (2007). Creating a climate for change: Communicating climate change and facilitating social change. Cambridge:
  14. (2009). Creating a common climate language.
  15. (2006). Creative compounds in English.
  16. (2005). Cultural circuits of climate change in U.K. Broadsheet Newspapers 1985–2003. Risk Analysis,
  17. (2005). Ecology, complexity and metaphor.
  18. (2003). Focus on metaphors: The case of ‘Frankenfood’ on the Web. doi
  19. (1994). Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies.
  20. (2008). Framing discourse on the environment: A critical discourse approach.
  21. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models.
  22. (2002). From ”Burning Library” to ”Green Medicine”. The role of metaphors in communicating biodiversity.
  23. (2008). from http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/background/items/3145.php
  24. Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability, Annex B. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge:
  25. (2009). Key sheets on climate change and poverty.
  26. (2000). Landscaping climate change: A mapping technique for understanding science and technology debates on the World Wide Web. Public Understanding of
  27. (2007). Lexical creativity, texts and contexts.
  28. (2008). Lost in translation? United States television news coverage of anthropogenic climate change,
  29. (2000). Mapping university-industry-government relations on the Internet: the construction of indicators for a knowledge-based economy,
  30. (2007). Markets, deliberation and environment.
  31. (1995). Metaphors - messengers of meaning. A contribution to an evolutionary sociology of science.
  32. (2005). Metaphors and biorisks: The war on infectious diseases and invasive species.
  33. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse.
  34. (2005). No issue, no public. Democratic deficits after the displacement of politics. Amsterdam: Ipskamp Printpartners.
  35. (1983). Participation in American politics: The dynamics of agenda-building.
  36. (1998). Political theory and public choice. doi
  37. (2009). Reorienting climate change communication for effective mitigation.
  38. (2000). Risks of communication: Discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media.
  39. (2007). RUOK? Blogging communication technologies during crises.
  40. (1987). Selling science. How the press covers science and technology.
  41. (1999). Telling stories about climate change. Measuring the impact of narratives on issue cycles.
  42. (2006). The BBC, Daily Telegraph and Wikinews timelines of the terrorist attacks of 7th
  43. (2001). The empirical approach to the study of media framing. In: Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social
  44. (1997). The order of meaning: The career of chaos as a metaphor.
  45. (2009). The oxford handbook of compounding.
  46. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse. Ecological Modernisation and the Policy Process. doi
  47. (1997). The politics of the Earth. doi
  48. (2004). The power and politics of Blogs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hilton Chicago and the Palmer House Hilton,
  49. (2005). The role of the media and media hypes in the aftermath of disasters.
  50. (2002). The way we think. doi
  51. (2007). Voluntary offsets for air-travel carbon emissions: Evaluations and recommendations of voluntary offset companies.
  52. (2008). Why we disagree about climate change: Understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge:

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.