Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Carbon reduction activism in the UK: lexical creativity and lexical framing in the context of climate change

By Brigitte Nerlich and Nelya Koteyko

Abstract

This article examines discourses associated with a new environmental movement, “Carbon Rationing Action Groups” (CRAGs). This case study is intended to contribute to a wider investigation of the emergence of a new type of language used to debate climate change mitigation. Advice on how to reduce one's “carbon footprint,” for example, is provided almost daily. Much of this advice is framed by the use of metaphors and “carbon compounds”—lexical combinations of at least two roots—such as “carbon finance” or “low carbon diet.” The study uses a combination of tools from frame analysis and lexical pragmatics within the general framework of ecolinguistics to compare and contrast language use on the CRAGs' website with press coverage reporting on them. The analysis shows how the use of such lexical carbon compounds enables and facilitates different types of metaphorical frames such as dieting, finance and tax paying, war time rationing, and religious imperatives in the two corpora

Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.nottingham.ac.uk:1302
Provided by: Nottingham ePrints

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2008). 29 February). Study of the UK‟s Carbon Rationing Action Groups
  2. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives.
  3. (2005). A framing analysis of activist rhetoric: How the Sierra club succeeds or fails at creating salient messages. doi
  4. (1995). A methodology for frame analysis: From discourse to cognitive schemata.
  5. Anonymous b (2007). We must act now if we are to overcome threat to our planet. Express and Echo,
  6. Anonymous c (2007). If China's busy building power stations, why should we bother making compost?
  7. (2007). Briefing: Carbon trading.
  8. (2007). Climate change: Stern implications for the Treasury. ESRC Society Today.
  9. (1995). Constructing the public good: Social movements and cultural resources. doi
  10. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis.
  11. (2005). Cultural circuits of climate change in U.K. broadsheet newspapers, 1985–2003. Risk Analysis,
  12. (1994). Culture and social movements. In
  13. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. doi
  14. (2002). Discourse-coalitions and the institutionalization of practice: The case of acid rain in Britain. In
  15. (2004). Don't think of an elephant: Know your values and frame the debate--the essential guide for progressives.
  16. (1992). Ecospeak: Rrhetoric and environmental politics in America.
  17. (2007). Emission control: U.K. citizens take lead;
  18. (2005). Energy ration cards for everyone planned. Daily Telegraph,
  19. (1995). Formatted: Font: Italic Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, 12 pt Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, 12 pt Gamson,
  20. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. doi
  21. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience.
  22. (1994). Frame reflections: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies.
  23. (2004). Framing as a cultural resource in health social movements: Funding activism and the breast cancer movement in the US 1990-1993.
  24. (2008). Framing discourse on the environment. London: Routledgee. Formatted: Font: Bold Formatted: Left Formatted: Font: Bold Formatted: Left Anonymous a (2007). People power cuts carbon. Canberra Times,
  25. (2007). Framing science.
  26. (1993). Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm.
  27. (1979). Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy.
  28. (1999). Greenspeak: A study of environmental discourse. Thousand Oaks,
  29. (2007). Heat: How we can stop the planet burning.
  30. (2007). Heroes welcome. Scotland on Sunday,
  31. (2001). Issue frames that strike a value balance: A political psychology perspective. In
  32. Letters to the editor (2006). Credit is not the answer to carbon debts.
  33. (2002). Lexical semantics and pragmatics.
  34. (2005). Logic, meaning, and conversation: Semantical underdeterminacy, implicature, and their interface.
  35. (1992). Master frames and cycles of protest. In
  36. (2007). Members of new group in Britain aim to offset their own carbon output.
  37. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago/London:
  38. (2005). Representing the politics of the greenhouse effect:
  39. (2000). Risks of communication: Discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media.
  40. (1998). Science and the media. doi
  41. (1995). Social movements and culture.
  42. (2006). Stern review on the economics of climate change. doi
  43. (2007). The future of public engagement.
  44. (2009). The hot topic: How to tackle global warming and still keep the lights on.
  45. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process.
  46. (2003). The politics of nature: Constructing German reunification during the great Oder flood of
  47. (2008). The real swindle. Nature Reports Climate Change,
  48. (2008). The Rough Guide to Climate Change. London: Rough Guides.
  49. (2007). Trend watch: Craggers.
  50. (2007). Village that‟s saving the world. The Observer,
  51. (2008). Want to cut your carbon? Join the club. Social networks where guilty greens admit to carbon crimes and are punished for profligacy spread through UK., The Observer,
  52. (2006). Warm words: Hhow are we telling the climate story and can we tell it better? London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
  53. (1994). Words in the mind: an introduction to the mental lexicon.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.