Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Open access to scholarly communications: advantages, policy and advocacy

By Ariadne Chloe FURNIVAL

Abstract

The Open Access (OA) movement regards OA modes of disseminating research as the unequivocal future of scholarly communication. Proponents of the open access movement itself have, over the last ten years, carried out systematic research to show how OA can tangibly benefit researchers, institutions and society at large. Even so, the number of research papers being uploaded to OA institutional repositories remains relatively low, frequently based on concerns which often contradict the facts. Policies for OA have been introduced to encourage author uptake, and these are also discussed here. Briefly delineating aspects of these phenomena, this paper will then move on to outline and discuss advocacy for OA in organisations, and whether this should be “downstream”, in the form of informational campaigns, or “upstream”, in the form of top-down change management. This paper seeks to make a contribution to these issues in the OA sphere, by brining into the debate strands from the literature of the sociology of science and management science that will hopefully elucidate aspects of author reactions to OA, and the perceived changes that its adoption gives rise to

OAI identifier: oai:eprints.nottingham.ac.uk:1419
Provided by: Nottingham ePrints

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1991). Available at: http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0011273 Budapest OA Initiative (2002). http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read.shtml Centre for Research Communications - CRC. http://crc.nottingham.ac.uk/
  2. (2008). Carrots and Sticks: Some Ideas on How to Create a Successful Institutional Repository.” D-Lib Magazine.
  3. (2003). Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities
  4. (2004). Do Open-Access articles have a greater research impact?” Available at: http://web.lib.ncsu.edu/staff/kaantelm/do_open_access_CRL.pdf ARROW. Australian Research Repositories. http://search.arrow.edu.au/
  5. (2007). Evaluating the Reasons for Non-use of Cornell University's Installation of DSpace.” D-Lib Magazine.
  6. (1999). From Organizational Development to Change Management: The Emergence of a New Profession.” doi
  7. (2003). Learning to overcome resistance to change in higher education: the role of Transformational Intelligence in the process. http://www.herdsa.org.au/wp-content/uploads/conference/2003/PDF/HERDSA16.pdf Van Westrienen,
  8. (1998). New Managerialism‟ and Higher Education: the management of performances and cultures
  9. (1998). Resistance: a constructive tool for change management.” Management Decision. v.36, n.8, p.543–548. Available at: http://www.icti.ie/articles/Resistance%20a%20constructive%20tool%20for%20change%20m anagement.pdf Watson,
  10. (2006). Scholarly Communication: Academic Values and Sustainable Models.” Center for Studies in Higher Education,
  11. (2004). Self archiving publications.” Published
  12. (2005). The acquisition of open access research articles. First Monday,
  13. (2004). The green and the gold roads to Open Access.” Nature Web Focus. Available at: http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/9940/ Harnard, S.
  14. (1988). The Mathew Effect in Science II. Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property. ISIS, 79 : 606-623 NECOBELAC. Network for Collaboration Between Europe and Latin American Caribbean countries. http://www.necobelac.eu
  15. (1979). The Normative Structure of Science" In:
  16. (2010). The Open Access citation advantage: Studies and results to date.
  17. (1990). Why change programs don‟t produce change.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.