Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Reducing the gradient artefact in simultaneous EEG-fMRI by adjusting the subject’s axial position

By Karen J. Mullinger, Winston X. Yan and Richard W. Bowtell

Abstract

Large artefacts which compromise EEG data quality are generated when electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) are carried out concurrently. The gradient artefact produced by the time-varying magnetic field gradients is the largest of these artefacts. Although average artefact correction (AAS) and related techniques can remove the majority of this artefact, the need to avoid amplifier saturation necessitates the use of a large dynamic range and strong low-pass filtering in EEG recording. Any intrinsic reduction in the gradient artefact amplitude would allow data with a higher bandwidth to be acquired without amplifier saturation, thus increasing the frequency range of neuronal activity that can be investigated using combined EEG-fMRI. Furthermore, gradient artefact correction methods assume a constant artefact morphology over time, so their performance is compromised by subject movement. Since the resulting, residual gradient artefacts can easily swamp signals from brain activity, any reduction in their amplitude would be highly advantageous for simultaneous EEG-fMRI studies. The aim of this work was to investigate whether adjustment of the subject’s axial position in the MRI scanner can reduce the amplitude of the induced gradient artefact, before and after artefact correction using AAS. The variation in gradient artefact amplitude as a function of the subject’s axial position was first investigated in six subjects by applying gradient pulses along the three Cartesian axes. The results of this study showed that a significant reduction in the gradient artefact magnitude can be achieved by shifting the subject axially by 4 cm towards the feet relative to the standard subject position (nasion at iso-centre). In a further study, the 4 cm shift was shown to produce a 40% reduction in the RMS amplitude (and a 31% reduction in the range) of the gradient artefact generated during the execution of a standard multi-slice, EPI sequence. By picking out signals occurring at harmonics of the slice acquisition frequency, it was also shown that the 4 cm shift led to a 36% reduction in the residual gradient artefact after AAS. Functional and anatomical MR data quality is not affected by the 4 cm shift, as the head remains in the homogeneous region of the static magnet field and gradients

Publisher: Elsevier
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.nottingham.ac.uk:1453
Provided by: Nottingham ePrints

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1990). 3-Dimensional Magnetization-Prepared Rapid Gradient-Echo Imaging (3dmp-Rage)." Magnetic Resonance In
  2. (2000). A Method for removing Imaging Artifact from Continuous EEG Recorded during Functional MRI."
  3. (2005). Assessing the spatiotemporal evolution of neuronal activation with single-trial event-related potential and functional MRI."
  4. (2008). Average Gradient Artefact Subtraction: the effect on neuronal signals. Human Brain Mapping,
  5. (2010). Avoiding the ballistocardiogram (BCG) artifact of EEG data acquired simultaneously with fMRI by pulse-triggered presentation of stimuli."
  6. (2009). Development, validation, and comparison of ICA-based gradient artifact reduction algoithms for simultaneous EEG-spiral in/out and echo-planar fMRI recordings."
  7. (2010). EEG signatures of audiotory activity correlate with simultaneously recorded fMRI responses in humans." doi
  8. (2003). Electroencephalographic signatures of attentional and cognitive default modes in spontaneous brain activity fluctuations at rest." doi
  9. (2004). Electroencephalography-correlated functional MR imaging studies of epileptic activity." doi
  10. (2007). Electroencephalography/function MRI in human epilespy: what it currently can and cannot do." doi
  11. (2008). Exploring the feasibility of simultaneous EEG/fMRI at 7T." Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  12. (2002). fMRI/EEG in paroxysmal activity elicited by elimination of central vision and fixation." doi
  13. (1995). Functional Brain Imaging; Chapter 8: Clinical Electroencephalography and Event-Related Potentials.
  14. (1998). Identification of EEG Events in the MR Scanner: The Problem of Pulse Artifact and a Method for Its Subtraction."
  15. (2008). Improved Artefact Correction for Combined Electroencephalography/Functional MRI by means of Synchronization and use of VCG Recordings."
  16. (2009). Laser-evoked potential single-trial amplitudes covary with the fMRI BOLD response in the medial paon system and interconnected subcortical structures." doi
  17. (1993). Monitoring a patient's EEG during echo planar MRI." doi
  18. (2008). Novelty and target processing during an auditory novelty oddball: a simultaneous event-related potential and functional magnetic resonance imaging study."
  19. (2010). Physical Modelling of pulse artefact sources in simultaneous EEG/fMRI." doi
  20. (2008). Properties of the ballistocardiogram artefact as revealed by EEG recordings at 1.5, 3 and 7 Tesla static magnetic field strength."
  21. (2009). Realignment parameter-informed artefact correction for simultaneous EEG-fMRI recordings." doi
  22. (2003). Review: Studying spontaneous EEG activity with fMRI."
  23. (2002). Simultaneous EEG-Correlated Ictal fMRI."
  24. (2009). Single trial P3 amplitude and latency informed event related fMRI models yield different BOLD response patterns to a target detection task." doi
  25. (2007). Single-Trial Analysis of Oddball Event-Related Potentials in Simultaneous EEG-fMRI."
  26. (2006). Single-trial EEGfMRI reveals the dynamics of cognitive function."
  27. (2008). Spatial attention related SEP amplitude modulations covary with BOLD signal in S1-a simultaneous EEG-fMRI study."
  28. (2003). Stepping stone sampling for retrieving artifact-free electoencephalogram during functional magnetic resonance imaging."
  29. (2006). Synchronisation facilitates removal of MRI artefacts from concurrent EEG recordings and increases usable bandwidth." doi
  30. (2008). Synchronized measurement of simultaneous EEG-fMRI: A simulation study." doi
  31. (2009). Ultrahigh-frequency EEG during fMRI: Pushing the limits of imagingartifact correction."
  32. (2009). Understanding Gradient Artefacts in Simultaneous EEG/fMRI." doi
  33. (2005). Visual Evoked Potentials May Be Recorded Simultaneously With fMRI Scanning: A Validation Study."

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.