Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Arguing Using Opponent Models

By Nir Oren and Timothy J. Norman

Abstract

Peer reviewedPostprin

Topics: argumentation, ARGUMENTATION, QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science, QA75
Year: 1
DOI identifier: 10.1007/978-3-642-12805-9
OAI identifier: oai:aura.abdn.ac.uk:2164/2204
Journal:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2008). An argumentation inspired heuristic for resolving normative conflict.
  2. (2006). Arguing with confidential information. doi
  3. (2002). Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond. Essays In Honour of doi
  4. (1993). Dialogue game theory for intelligent tutoring systems.
  5. (2002). Dialogue games in multi-agent systems. doi
  6. (2008). editors. Computational Models of Argument:
  7. (2004). Generation and evaluation of different types of arguments in negotiation.
  8. Heuristics in argumentation: A game theory investigation. doi
  9. (1996). Incorporating opponent models into adversary search. In
  10. (2006). Loose lips sink ships: a heuristic for argumentation.
  11. (2008). Mechanism design for abstract argumentation. doi
  12. (1998). Model-based learning of interaction strategies in multi-agent systems. doi
  13. (1995). On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. doi
  14. (2004). On the bipolarity in argumentation frameworks. doi
  15. (2007). On the relevance of utterances in formal inter-agent dialogues. doi
  16. (2001). Probabilistic opponent-model search. Information Sciences, doi
  17. (1950). Programming a computer for playing chess. doi
  18. (2006). Progressive defeat paths in abstract argumentation frameworks. doi
  19. (2001). Relating protocols for dynamic dispute with logics for defeasible argumentation. doi
  20. Semantics for evidence-based argumentation. doi
  21. (2002). Strategical considerations for argumentative agents (preliminary report).
  22. (2007). Success chances in argument games:a probabilistic approach to legal disputes. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.