Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Strategies for achieving a high response rate in a home interview survey

By Kirsty Kiezebrink, Iain K. Crombie, Linda Irvine, Vivien Swanson, Kevin Power, Wendy L. Wrieden and Peter W. Slane


Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Topics: telephone interviews, nonresponse bias, metaanalysis, recruitment, incentives, trials, census, mail, R Medicine, R
Year: 2009
DOI identifier: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-46
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2006). A: Using CommunityLevel Correlates to Evaluate Nonresponse Effects in a Telephone Survey. Public Opinion Quarterly doi
  2. (2002). Bartholomae S: The recruitment of normal healthy volunteers: a review of the literature on the use of financial incentives. doi
  3. (1995). Capon T: Increasing response rates in telephone surveys: a randomized trial.
  4. (2001). Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best pracitce applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients. Health Technology Assessment
  5. (2005). Frost C: Meta-analysis of randomised trials of monetary incentives and response to mailed questionnaires. doi
  6. (2006). Haines A: Overcoming barriers to recruitment in health research. BMJ doi
  7. (2007). Loosveldt G: Minimizing survey refusal and noncontract rates: do our efforts pay off? Survey Research Methods
  8. (2006). Maximising response to postal questionnaires – a systematic review of randomised trials in health research.
  9. (2003). Measuring socioeconomic position in dietary research: is choice of socio-economic indicator important? Public Health Nutr doi
  10. (2007). Methods to increase response rates to postal questionnaires. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews doi
  11. (2006). Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly doi
  12. (2006). Nonresponse in the American Time Use Survey. Who is missing from the data and how much does it matter? Public Opinion Quarterly doi
  13. (2004). Office of the Chief Statistician: Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation
  14. (2002). PD C: Factors affecting response rates to the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study survey. Med Care doi
  15. (2002). PD: Using telephone interviews to reduce nonresponse bias to mail surveys of health plan members. Med Care doi
  16. (2006). Personally addressed hand-signed letters increase questionnaire response: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
  17. (1984). Quality of response in different population groups in mail and telephone surveys.
  18. (2007). Roberts I: Strategies to improve recruitment to research studies. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews doi
  19. (1997). S: Selection bias from sampling frames: telephone directory and electoral roll compared with door-to-door population census: results from the Blue Mountains Eye Study. doi
  20. (2002). Separating refusal bias and non-contact bias: evidence from UK national surveys. The Statistician doi
  21. (2005). Survey Non-Response Procedures in Cross-National Perspective: The
  22. (2006). The long-term effectiveness of refusal conversion procedures on longitudinal surveys. doi
  23. (1997). Tierney WM: Assessing inner-city patients' hospital experiences. A controlled trial of telephone interviews versus mailed surveys. Med Care doi
  24. (2006). Torgerson DJ: Increasing recruitment to randomised trials: a review of randomised controlled trials.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.