Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Improving the care for people with acute low-back pain by allied health professionals (the ALIGN trial) : A cluster randomised trial protocol

By Joanne E. McKenzie, Denise A. O'Connor, Matthew J. Page, Duncan S. Mortimer, Simon D. French, Bruce F. Walker, Jennifer L. Keating, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Susan Michie, Jill J. Francis and Sally E. Green


Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Year: 2010
DOI identifier: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-86
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2000). A quantifiable alternative to double data entry. Control Clin Trials
  2. (1994). A survey of chiropractic practice in Europe.
  3. (2009). A theory-based cross-sectional survey demonstrated the important role of awareness in guideline implementation.
  4. (2005). A: Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care
  5. (2003). AC: Inclusion of patients in clinical trial analysis: the intention-to-treat principle.
  6. (2006). al: Fearavoidance beliefs about back pain in patients with subacute low back pain. Pain doi
  7. (2010). Altman DG: CONSORT
  8. (1988). AO: Managing low back pain–a comparison of the beliefs and behaviors of family physicians and chiropractors.
  9. (2000). Are nonspecific practice guidelines potentially harmful? A randomized comparison of the effect of nonspecific versus specific guidelines on physician decision making. Health Serv Res
  10. (2003). Australian Acute Musculoskeletal Pain Guidelines Group (AAMPGG): Evidence-based management of acute musculoskeletal pain.
  11. (1995). Bouter LM: Chiropractic in The Netherlands: a survey of Dutch chiropractors.
  12. (2005). Bouter LM: Effect on the process of care of an active strategy to implement clinical guidelines on physiotherapy for low back pain: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Qual Saf Health Care
  13. (2005). Bouter LM: Should treatment of (sub)acute low back pain be aimed at psychosocial prognostic factors? Cluster randomised clinical trial in general practice. BMJ
  14. (2005). Changing the behavior of healthcare professionals: the use of theory in promoting the uptake of research findings.
  15. (2008). Chenot JF: Effects of two guideline implementation strategies on patient outcomes in primary care: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Spine
  16. (2001). Contamination in trials: is cluster randomisation the answer? BMJ
  17. (2000). Council: A framework for development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health, MRC Health Services and Public Health Board discussion document.
  18. (1989). Covariate imbalance and random allocation in clinical trials. Stat Med
  19. (1998). Covariate imbalance, adjustment for. In Encyclopedia of biostatistics. Edited by: Armitage P, Colton T.
  20. (2008). Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ
  21. (2005). Differential recruitment in a cluster randomized trial in primary care: the experience of the UK back pain, exercise, active management and manipulation (UK BEAM) feasibility study. Clin Trials
  22. (2006). Do self- reported intentions predict clinicians’ behaviour: a systematic review. Implement Sci
  23. (1976). Doctors with a special interest in back pain have poorer knowledge about how to treat back pain. Spine (Phila Pa doi
  24. (2006). E: Does physiotherapy management of low back pain change as a result of an evidence-based educational programme? J Eval Clin Pract
  25. (2004). Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess
  26. (2004). Elbourne DR, Altman DG: CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ
  27. (2008). et al: IMPLEmenting a clinical practice guideline for acute low back pain evidence-based manageMENT in general practice (IMPLEMENT): Cluster randomised controlled trial study protocol. Implement Sci doi
  28. (2003). Evidence for risk of bias in cluster randomised trials: review of recent trials published in three general medical journals. BMJ
  29. (2008). Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med
  30. (2007). GD: Advice for the management of low back pain: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Man Ther
  31. (2002). General practitioners’ use of magnetic resonance imaging: an open randomized trial comparing telephone and written requests and an open randomized controlled trial of different methods of local guideline dissemination. Clin Radiol doi
  32. (2003). Gonstead Chiropractic Technique (GCT). doi
  33. (2007). Gool K: Targeting services to reduce social inequalities in utilisation: an analysis of breast cancer screening in New South Wales. Aust New Zealand Health Policy
  34. (2005). Grol R: Implementation of the Dutch low back pain guideline for general practitioners: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Spine
  35. (2008). Gulliford MC: Comparison of the risk difference, risk ratio and odds ratio scales for quantifying the unadjusted intervention effect in cluster randomized trials. Stat Med
  36. (2005). Hendriks E, et al: Cost-effectiveness of an active implementation strategy for the Dutch physiotherapy guideline for low back pain. Health Policy
  37. (2008). Hendriks EJ: Multifaceted strategies may increase implementation of physiotherapy clinical guidelines: a systematic review. doi
  38. (2006). I: Family focused grief therapy: a randomized, controlled trial in palliative care and bereavement.
  39. (2009). Imaging strategies for low-back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet
  40. (2008). Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. BMJ doi
  41. (2008). Imputation strategies for missing continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
  42. (2000). Influence of postal distribution of the Royal College of Radiologists’ guidelines, together with feedback on radiological referral rates, on X-ray referrals from general practice: a randomized controlled trial. Fam Pract doi
  43. (2008). Internal and external validity of cluster randomised trials: systematic review of recent trials. BMJ
  44. (2003). JD: Randomized controlled trial of education and feedback for implementation of guidelines for acute low back pain. doi
  45. (2003). JF: Chiropractor’s use of radiography in Switzerland.
  46. (2001). JM: Cluster trials in implementation research: estimation of intracluster correlation coefficients and sample size. Stat Med
  47. (2010). KB: Advice to rest in bed versus advice to stay active for acute low-back pain and sciatica. Cochrane Database Syst Rev
  48. (2008). Keating JL: Can we predict poor recovery from recent-onset nonspecific low back pain? A systematic review. Man Ther
  49. (2008). KF: CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med
  50. (2002). Lack of concealment may lead to selection bias in cluster randomized trials of palliative care. Palliat Med
  51. (2010). Low back pain and best practice care: A survey of general practice physicians. Arch Intern Med
  52. (2010). NE: The effectiveness of a posted information package on the beliefs and behavior of musculoskeletal physiotherapists: The UK Chiropractors, Osteopaths, and Muculoskeletal Physiotherapists Low Back Pain ManagemENT (COMPLeMENT) randomized trial. Spine
  53. (2009). NF: Primary care clinicians use variable methods to assess acute nonspecific low back pain and usually focus on impairments. Man Ther
  54. (2004). of Health and Welfare: Rural, regional and remote health: a guide to remoteness classifications.
  55. (2005). Oostendorp RA: Implementation of clinical guidelines on physical therapy for patients with low back pain: randomized trial comparing patient outcomes after a standard and active implementation strategy. Phys Ther
  56. (2000). Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: summary and general recommendations. Spine
  57. (1996). Patterns of ordering diagnostic tests for patients with acute low back pain. The North Carolina Back Pain Project. Ann Intern Med
  58. (1999). PG: Methods for evaluating area-wide and organisation-based interventions in health and health care: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess
  59. (2001). Physical therapy management of low back pain: an exploratory survey of therapist approaches. Phys Ther
  60. (2007). Planning and studying improvement in patient care: the use of theoretical perspectives. Milbank Q
  61. (2006). Poiraudeau S: General practitioners’ fear-avoidance beliefs influence their management of patients with low back pain. Pain doi
  62. (2003). Pragmatic controlled clinical trials in primary care: the struggle between external and internal validity. BMC Med Res Methodol
  63. (2003). Quantifying Gains in Data Quality for Sampling Plans Used in Clinical Trial Monitoring. Drug Inf J
  64. (1994). Randomized controlled trial of the effect of the Royal College of Radiologists’ guidelines on general practitioners’ referrals for radiographic examination.
  65. (2009). Ravaud P: Preventing bias in cluster randomised trials. PLoS Med
  66. (2003). Refshauge KM: Acute low back pain: systematic review of its prognosis. BMJ
  67. (2003). Research designs for studies evaluating the effectiveness of change and improvement strategies. Qual Saf Health Care
  68. (1998). RH: How good is the quality of health care in the United States? Milbank Q
  69. (2004). Rose MJ: Implementation of RCGP guidelines for acute low back pain: a cluster randomised controlled trial.
  70. (2001). S: Effect of audit and feedback, and reminder messages on primary-care radiology referrals: a randomised trial. Lancet
  71. (2004). S: Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: best practices and recommendations from the NIH Behavior Change Consortium. Health Psychol
  72. (2001). Safety, efficacy, and cost effectiveness of evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute low back pain in primary care. Spine
  73. (2000). Sample size calculations for cluster randomised trials.
  74. (2005). SG: Adjusting for partially missing baseline measurements in randomized trials. Stat Med
  75. (2000). Shapiro S: Coordination of primary health care for back pain. A randomized controlled trial. Spine doi
  76. (2005). Soumerai SB: Systematic Review: The Relationship between Clinical Experience and Quality of Health Care. Ann Intern Med
  77. (2009). StataCorp: Stata Statistical Software: Release 11. College Station TX: StataCorp LP;
  78. (2010). Statistical considerations in a systematic review of proxy measures of clinical behaviour. Implement Sci
  79. (2001). Successes and Failures in the Implementation of Evidence-Based Guidelines for Clinical Practice. Med Care
  80. (1999). The American health care system–the movement for improved quality in health care.
  81. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol
  82. (1991). The prevention of chronic pain and disability: a preliminary investigation. Behav Res Ther
  83. (2010). This Patient Develop Persistent Disabling Low Back Pain? JAMA doi
  84. (2009). Torgerson DJ: Bias in identifying and recruiting participants in cluster randomised trials: what can be done? BMJ
  85. (1998). Torgerson DJ: Understanding controlled trials: What are pragmatic trials? BMJ
  86. (2010). Using the theory of planned behaviour as a process evaluation tool in randomised trials of knowledge translation strategies: A case study from UK general practice. Implement Sci
  87. (2002). Views on radiography use for patients with acute low back pain among chiropractors in an Ontario community.
  88. (2004). WD: Low back pain in Australian adults: health provider utilization and care seeking.
  89. (2004). WD: Low back pain in Australian adults: prevalence and associated disability.
  90. (2003). WD: Low back pain in Australian adults: the economic burden.
  91. (1999). What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials. BMJ
  92. (2006). Wing PC: Knowledge transfer in family physicians managing patients with acute low back pain: a prospective randomized control trial.
  93. (2010). WS: What is the prognosis of back pain? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol
  94. (2004). Zaslavsky AM: Too much ado about two-part models and transformation? Comparing methods of modeling Medicare expenditures.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.