Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Feedback GAP : study protocol for a cluster-randomized trial of goal setting and action plans to increase the effectiveness of audit and feedback interventions in primary care

By Noah M Ivers, Karen Tu, Jill Francis, Jan Barnsley, Baiju Shah, Ross Upshur, Alex Kiss, Jeremy M Grimshaw and Merrick Zwarenstein

Abstract

Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Topics: RA Public aspects of medicine, RA
Year: 2010
DOI identifier: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-98
OAI identifier: oai:aura.abdn.ac.uk:2164/1133

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance Englewood Cliffs,
  2. (2006). Audit and feedback and clinical practice guideline adherence: Making feedback actionable. Implement Sci
  3. (2006). Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev
  4. (2009). Canadian Cardiovascular Society/ Canadian guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemia and prevention of cardiovascular disease in the adult -
  5. (2008). Canadian Diabetes Association 2008: Update on the Canadian Diabetes Association
  6. (2010). Canadian Hypertension Education Program, Campbell N, Kwong MM:
  7. (2006). CD: Intra-cluster correlation coefficients in adults with diabetes in primary care practices: the Vermont Diabetes Information System field survey. BMC Med Res Methodol
  8. (2009). Changing nutrition, physical activity and body weight among student nurses and midwives: effects of a planning intervention and self-efficacy beliefs.
  9. (2001). Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? BMJ doi
  10. (2000). Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed-method studies. Res Nurs Health
  11. (2004). Commitment to change: exploring its role in changing physician behavior through continuing education. J Contin Educ Health Prof
  12. (2009). COMPETE II Investigators: Individualized electronic decision support and reminders to improve diabetes care in the community: COMPETE II randomized trial. CMAJ
  13. (2007). Cox JL: Quality indicators for cardiovascular primary care.
  14. (1996). DeNisi A: The Effects of Feedback Interventions on Performance: A Historical Review, a Meta-Analysis, and a Preliminary Feedback Intervention Theory. Psychol Bull
  15. (2000). Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials
  16. (2009). Diabetes: A Summary of Relevant Guidelines,
  17. Educational Interventions. In Knowledge Translation in Health Care - Moving from Evidence to Practice. Edited by: Straus
  18. (2004). Engelgau MM: Diabetes translation research: where are we and where do we want to be? Ann Intern Med
  19. (2003). Exploring the audit trail for qualitative investigations. Nurse Educ doi
  20. (2010). Grol R: Improving access to primary care: the impact of a quality-improvement strategy. Qual Saf Health Care
  21. (2007). Heyland DK: Implementation of the Canadian Clinical Practice Guidelines for Nutrition Support: a multiple case study of barriers and enablers. Nutr Clin Pract doi
  22. (1999). Implementation Intentions. Am Psychol
  23. Introduction to MAINPRO CPD, The College of Family Physicians of Canada.
  24. (2010). KJ: Improving quality of care. A systematic review on how medical registries provide information feedback to health care providers. doi
  25. (2002). Latham GP: Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. Am Psychol
  26. (2008). LL: Knowledge and attitudes of primary care physicians in the management of patients at risk for cardiovascular events. BMC Fam Pract
  27. Manstead ASR: Changing health-related behaviors: An approach based on the theory of planned behavior. In The scope of social psychology: Theory and applications. Edited by: van den
  28. (2009). Meta-analysis: audit and feedback features impact effectiveness on care quality. Med Care
  29. Minim: allocation by minimisation in clinical trials by Stephen Evans, Patrick Royston and Simon Day.
  30. (2002). MK: The method of minimization for allocation to clinical trials. a review. Control Clin Trials
  31. (1998). Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction.
  32. (2009). NJ: Use of blood pressure lowering drugs in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of 147 randomised trials in the context of expectations from prospective epidemiological studies. BMJ
  33. (2001). NW: Improving quality improvement using achievable benchmarks for physician feedback: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA
  34. (2010). Olson CA: Commitment to Practice Change: An Evaluator’s Perspective. Eval Health Prof
  35. (2006). Owens DK: Effects of quality improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes on glycemic control: a meta-regression analysis. JAMA
  36. (2010). Pasternak RC: Relation of different measures of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol to risk of coronary artery disease and death in a metaregression analysis of large-scale trials of statin therapy.
  37. (2006). Perrier L: Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. JAMA
  38. (2008). Physician gender is associated with the quality of type 2 diabetes care.
  39. Planning and the Implementation of Goals. In Handbook of self-regulation: research, theory, and applications. Edited by: Baumeister RF, Vohs KD.
  40. (2005). Psychological Theory’ Group: Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care
  41. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In Analyzing qualitative data. Edited by: Bryman A, Burgess RG.
  42. (2000). Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data. BMJ doi
  43. (1995). RB: No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. CMAJ
  44. (2008). Requesting a commitment to change: conditions that produce behavioral or attitudinal commitment. J Contin Educ Health Prof
  45. (1992). Sampling in Qualitative Inquiry. In Doing Qualitative Research. Research Methods for Primary Care.
  46. (1982). Scheier MF: Control theory: a useful conceptual framework for personality-social, clinical, and health psychology. Psychol Bull
  47. (1994). Self-efficacy. In Encyclopedia of human behavior. Edited by: Ramachandran VS.
  48. Stand Up To Diabetes - About Diabetes Testing Report - Ontario.ca.
  49. (2004). The Social Context of Performance Appraisal: A Review and Framework for the Future.
  50. (2007). The story behind the story: physician skepticism about relying on clinical information technologies to reduce medical errors.
  51. (2006). Torgerson DJ: Is restricted randomisation necessary? BMJ
  52. (2009). Towards a theory of intentional behaviour change: plans, planning, and self-regulation.
  53. (2005). Treatment allocation by minimisation. BMJ
  54. (2010). Using theory to synthesise evidence from behaviour change interventions: the example of audit and feedback. Soc Sci Med
  55. (2006). Vilis E: Family physicians’ reactions to performance assessment feedback. Can Fam Physician
  56. (2008). W: Critically appraising qualitative research. BMJ doi
  57. (2005). What do we know about how to do audit and feedback? Pitfalls in applying evidence from a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res
  58. (2001). Yeatts EJ: Effects of a signature on rates of change: a randomized controlled trial involving continuing education and the commitment-to-change model. Acad Med

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.