Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Relational discrepancies and emotion : The moderating roles of relationship type and relational discrepancy valence

By Jennifer M. Boldero, Garry L. Robins, Benedict J. Williams, Jillian Francis, Anne Hampton and Annabelle J. Fourie

Abstract

Peer reviewedPostprin

Topics: discrepancy valence, emotion, relational discrepancies, relationship type, CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS, SELF-DISCREPANCIES, IDEALS, FOCUS, BF Psychology, BF
Year: 1
DOI identifier: 10.1111/j.1467-839X.2009.01290.x
OAI identifier: oai:aura.abdn.ac.uk:2164/785
Journal:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1945). A basis for analysing test-retest reliability.
  2. (2005). Adolescent peer networks as a context for social and emotional support. doi
  3. (2007). Attachment and the experience and expression of emotions in romantic relationships. doi
  4. (2004). Bias and accuracy in close relationships: An integrative review.
  5. (1994). Categories of social relationship.
  6. (1983). Close Relationships
  7. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.
  8. (1997). Expectancy*value effects: Regulatory focus as determinant of magnitude and direction. doi
  9. (2001). Ideal standards, the self, and flexibility of ideals in close relationships.
  10. (1999). Ideals in intimate relationships.
  11. (1999). Ideals, oughts, and self-regulation: Are the qualitatively distinct self-guides?
  12. (2000). Ideals, perceptions, and evaluations in early relationship development.
  13. (2004). Intimacy expectations in same-sex friendships: A prototype interactionpattern model.
  14. (1980). Monotone transformations to additivity using splines. doi
  15. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks,
  16. (1973). New directions in equity research. doi
  17. (1998). Pleasure and pain in doing well together: An investigation of performancerelated affect in close relationships.
  18. (1976). Regression with qualitative and quantitative variables: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling. doi
  19. (2003). Relational discrepancy theory: The implications of selfdiscrepancy theory for dyadic relationships and for the emergence of social structure. doi
  20. (1999). Relational models theory: A confirmatory factor analysis.
  21. (1994). Reliability for the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, doi
  22. (1997). Self-discrepancy and emotion in the workplace. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
  23. (1989). Self-discrepancy theory: What patterns of self-beliefs cause people to suffer? In
  24. (1995). Self-esteem and the extended self-evaluation maintenance model. In
  25. (2006). Self-lines: A new, psychometrically sound, ‘user-friendly’ idiographic technique for assessing selfdiscrepancies.
  26. (1998). Similarity and uniqueness focus: A paper tiger and a surprise. doi
  27. (1991). Structures of social life: The four elemental forms of social relationship.
  28. (2001). The association between relational discrepancies and emotion: Investigating the moderating role of hierarchy in dyads within sporting teams. Relational discrepancies and emotion Unpublished psychology honours thesis,
  29. (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations.
  30. (1999). The nature of the relationship between remarried individuals and former spouses and its impact on marital satisfaction.
  31. (1959). The social psychology of groups. doi
  32. (2001). The structure and function of ideal standards in close relationships. In doi
  33. (1999). When do self-discrepancies have specific relations to emotions? The second-generation question of Tangney, doi
  34. (2008). When fairness is especially important: Reactions to being inequitably paid in communal relationships. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.