Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Arguing and negotiating in the presence of social influences

By N C Karunatillake, N R Jennings, I Rahwan and T J Norman



Topics: argumentation-based negotiation, conflict resolution, QA76 Computer software, QA76
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Year: 2005
DOI identifier: 10.1007/11559221_23
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2004). A dialogue game protocol for multi-agent argument over proposals for action. In: doi
  2. (2003). A dialogue-game protocol for agent purchase negotiations. doi
  3. (1998). A framework for argumentation-based negotiation. In: doi
  4. (2000). Agents’ Conflicts: New Issues. In: Conflicting Agents Conflict Management in Multi-Agent Systems.
  5. (2000). Argument, dialogue and negotiation. doi
  6. (1996). Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. doi
  7. (2003). Argumentation-based negotiation. doi
  8. (1995). Commitments: From individual intentions to groups and organizations. In:
  9. (1992). Communication, and Fallacies. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc,
  10. (1995). E.C.W.: Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. State Univ. of NY
  11. (1998). In:
  12. (2004). N.R.: Is it worth arguing? In: doi
  13. (2002). N.R.: Using similarity criteria to make trade-offs in automated negotiations. doi
  14. (1998). On social commitment, roles and preferred goals. In: doi
  15. (1979). Question-begging in non-cumulative systems. doi
  16. (2005). T.J.: Argument-based negotiation in a social context. In: doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.