Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Meaning behind measurement : self-comparisons affect responses to health related quality of life questionnaires

By Clare Robertson, Anne L. Langston, Sally Stapley, Elaine McColl, William D. Fraser, Peter L. Selby, Stuart H. Ralston, Peter M. Fayers, Marion Kay Campbell, Graeme Stewart MacLennan and PRISM Trial Group

Abstract

Purpose The subjective nature of quality of life is particularly pertinent to the domain of health-related quality of\ud life (HRQOL) research. The extent to which participants’ responses are affected by subjective information and personal reference frames is unknown. This study investigated how an elderly population living with a chronic metabolic bone disorder evaluated self-reported quality of life. Methods Participants (n = 1,331) in a multi-centre randomised controlled trial for the treatment of Paget’s disease completed annual HRQOL questionnaires, including the SF-36, EQ-5D and HAQ. Supplementary questions were added to reveal implicit reference frames used when making HRQOL evaluations. Twenty-one participants (11 male, 10 female, aged 59–91 years) were interviewed retrospectively about their responses to the supplementary questions, using cognitive interviewing techniques and semi-structured topic guides. Results The interviews revealed that participants used complex and interconnected reference frames to promote response shift when making quality of life evaluations. The choice of reference frame often reflected external factors unrelated to individual health. Many participants also stated that they were unclear whether to report general or disease-related HRQOL. Conclusions It is important, especially in clinical trials, to provide instructions clarifying whether ‘quality of life’ refers to disease-related HRQOL. Information on selfcomparison reference frames is necessary for the interpretation of responses to questions about HRQOL.The Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health Directorates, \ud The PRISM funding bodies (the Arthritis Research Campaign, the National Association for the Relief of Paget’s disease and the Alliance for Better Bone Health)Peer reviewedAuthor final versio

Topics: Health-related quality of life, Paget’s disease, Elderly, Cognitive interviewing, Self-comparison, RA Public aspects of medicine
Publisher: Springer
Year: 2009
DOI identifier: 10.1007/s11136-008-9435-1
OAI identifier: oai:aura.abdn.ac.uk:2164/306
Journal:

Suggested articles


To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.