Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Health inequalities in England, Scotland and Wales : stakeholders' accounts and policy compared

By B.E. Harrington, K.E. Smith, D.J. Hunter, L Marks, T.J. Blackman, A Greene, E Elliott, G.H. Williams and Lorna McKee

Abstract

Objectives \ud The election of a Labour government in 1997 brought the issue of health inequalities firmly back on to the policy agenda across the UK. Since then, in the wake of devolution, the need to tackle health inequalities has been highlighted as a policy priority in all three mainland UK countries, albeit with varying degrees of emphasis. This paper reports on a major cross-national study, funded by the Economic and Social Research Council, investigating how National Health Service bodies, local councils and partnerships make sense of their work on health inequalities, and examining the difference made by the contrasting approaches that have been taken to performance assessment in England, Wales and Scotland.\ud Study design\ud Case studies, semi-structured interviews and analysis of key policy statements.\ud Methods\ud In order to explore how health inequalities have been approached by the three governments (noting that there was a change in governments in Wales and Scotland during this time), key policy statements published between May 1997 and May 2007 were analysed. Concurrently, data from stakeholder interviews carried out in 2006 in case study areas in each country were analysed to determine the extent of alignment between policy and practice at local level.\ud Results\ud This paper suggests that claims about the extent of health policy divergence in post-devolution Britain may have been exaggerated. It finds that, whilst the three countries have taken differing approaches to performance assessment and the setting of targets, policy approaches to health inequalities up until 2007 appear to have been remarkably similar. Furthermore, the first round of interview data suggest that variations in local understandings of, and responses to, health inequalities cannot always be clearly distinguished along national lines.\ud Conclusions\ud Based on the policy analysis, devolution in the UK does not appear to have resulted in substantively different national policy approaches to health inequalities. Indeed, the overall analysis suggests that (prior to the 2007 elections in Scotland and Wales) the differences between local areas within countries may be of as much interest as those between countries.The Economic and Social Research CouncilPeer reviewedPreprin

Topics: Health inequality, Health policy, Performance assessment, Devolution, UK, RA Public aspects of medicine
Publisher: Elsevier
Year: 2009
DOI identifier: 10.1016/j.puhe.2008.10.010
OAI identifier: oai:aura.abdn.ac.uk:2164/277
Journal:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2004). Building a Better Scotland Spending Proposals 2005-2008:
  2. (2001). Divergence and Devolution. London: The Nuffield Trust;
  3. Divergence or Convergence? Health Inequalities and Policy in a Devolved Britain Critical Social Policy
  4. (2004). Four way Bet - How Devolution has led to four different models for the NHS. London: The Constitution Unit;
  5. (2007). Health inequalities in Scotland and England: the contrasting journeys of ideas from research into policy. doi
  6. (2004). Health inequalities: concepts, frameworks and policy (Briefing Paper).
  7. (2003). Health: how far can Wales diverge from England? In
  8. Health. From Vision to Reality. London: Department of Health;
  9. (2001). Health. Health Secretary announces new plans to improve health in poorest areas. London: Department of Health;
  10. (2002). How great expectations in Westminster may be dashed locally: the local implementation of national policy on health inequalities. Policy and Politics
  11. (2005). Managing for Health. London: King's Fund;
  12. (2003). Scottish Executive Health Department. Improving Health in Scotland – The Challenge. Edinburgh: The Scottish Executive;
  13. (2004). Spending Review: Public Service Agreements
  14. (2004). Tackling Health Inequalities: turning policy into practice?
  15. (2003). The Final Report of the Tackling Inequalities in Health Module.
  16. The Politics of Health Policy Divergence. London: The Constitution Unit,
  17. (2005). The Territorial Bases of Health Policymaking in the UK after Devolution. Regional and Federal Studies doi
  18. (2003). Understanding and Complexity. Evaluation
  19. (2000). Understanding Health Inequalities. Milton Keynes:

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.