Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

The Knee Arthroplasty Trial (KAT) : design features, baseline characteristics and two-year functional outcomes after alternative approaches to knee replacement

By Marion Kay Campbell, Adrian Maxwell Grant, Graeme Stewart MacLennan, Craig R Ramsay, KAT Trial Group, Nick Fiddian, Ray Fitzpatrick, Alastair Gray, Richard Morris, David Murray, David Rowley, Linda Johnston, Kirsty McCormack and Allan Walker

Abstract

Background: The aim of continued development of total knee replacement systems has been the further improvement of the quality of life and increasing the duration of prosthetic survival. Our goal was to evaluate the effects of several design features, including metal backing of the tibial component, patellar resurfacing, and a mobile bearing between the tibial and femoral components, on the function and survival of the implant. Methods: A pragmatic, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial involving 116 surgeons in thirty-four centers in the United Kingdom was performed; 2352 participants were randomly allocated to be treated with or without a metal backing of the tibial component (409), with or without patellar resurfacing (1715), and/or with or without a mobile bearing (539). Randomization to more than one comparison was allowed. The primary outcome measures were the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Short Form-12, EuroQol-5D, and the need for additional surgery. The results up to two years postoperatively are reported. Results: Functional status and quality-of-life scores were low at baseline but improved markedly across all trial groups following knee replacement (mean overall OKS, 17.98 points at baseline and 34.82 points at two years). Most of the change was observed at three months after the surgery. Six percent of the patients had additional knee surgery within two years. There was no evidence of differences in clinical, functional, or quality-of-life measures between the randomized groups at two years. Conclusions: Patients have substantial improvement following total knee replacement. This is the first adequately powered randomized controlled trial, of which we are aware, in which the effects of metal backing, patellar resurfacing, and a mobile bearing were investigated. We found no evidence of an effect of these variants on the rate of early complications or on functional recovery up to two years after total knee replacement. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme (Project Number 95/10/01); Howmedica Osteonics; Zimmer; DePuy, a Johnson and Johnson company; Corin Medical; Smith and Nephew Healthcare. Biomet Merck; and Wright CremascoliPeer reviewe

Topics: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, Recovery of Function, Quality of Life, RD Surgery
Publisher: Wiley
Year: 2009
DOI identifier: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01074
OAI identifier: oai:aura.abdn.ac.uk:2164/272
Journal:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1996). A 12-item short-form health survey. Med Care
  2. (2003). Allpolyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in total arthroplasty: a matched pair analysis of functional outcome.
  3. (2001). Appropriate questionnaires for knee arthroplasty. Results of survey of 3600 patients from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Registry. J Bone Joint Surg (Br)
  4. (1994). ASA Physical Status and age predict morbidity after three surgical procedures.
  5. (2003). Clin Orthop Relat Res.
  6. (2004). DAMASK Trial Team. Patient-assessed health instruments for the knee: a structured review. Rheumatology
  7. (1998). Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess patients’ perceptions in relation to total knee replacement surgery.
  8. (1993). Difficulties with bearing dislocation and breakage using movable bearing total knee replacement system. Clinical Orthopaedics
  9. (2003). Functional rating for knee arthroplasty: comparison of three scoring systems. Orthopedics
  10. (1990). Long-term survivorship analysis of cruciatesparing versus cruciate-sacrificing knee prostheses using meniscal bearings. Clinical Orthopaedics
  11. (1993). Long-tern results of total condylar knee arthroplasty. A 15-year survivorship study. Clinical Orthopaedics
  12. (1989). New Jersey low contact stress knee replacement system. Ten year evaluation of meniscal bearings. Orthop Clin North Am
  13. (2002). Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty : a prospective trial,
  14. (2005). Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty, A meta-analysis,
  15. (1990). The EuroQol Group. EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of healthrelated quality of life. Health Policy
  16. (2006). The evaluation of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing, Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc,
  17. (1996). The time trade-off method: results from a general population study. Health Economics
  18. (1989). The total condylar prosthesis. 10- to 1twoyear results of a cemented knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br)
  19. (1996). Theory and practice of meniscal knee replacement: designing against wear.
  20. (2004). Wymenga A (2004). Mobile bearing vs fixed bearing prostheses for total knee arthroplasty postoperative functional status in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis (2004). Cochrane Database Syst Rev

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.