Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

A review of RCTs in four medical journals to assess the use of imputation to overcome missing data in quality of life outcomes

By Shona Fielding, Graeme Stewart MacLennan, Jonathan Alistair Cook and Craig R Ramsay

Abstract

Background: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are perceived as the gold-standard method for evaluating healthcare interventions, and increasingly include quality of life (QoL) measures. The observed results are susceptible to bias if a substantial proportion of outcome data are missing. The review aimed to determine whether imputation was used to deal with missing QoL outcomes. Methods: A random selection of 285 RCTs published during 2005/6 in the British Medical Journal, Lancet, New England Journal of Medicine and Journal of American Medical Association were identified. Results: QoL outcomes were reported in 61 (21%) trials. Six (10%) reported having no missing data, 20 (33%) reported ≤ 10% missing, eleven (18%) 11%–20% missing, and eleven (18%) reported >20% missing. Missingness was unclear in 13 (21%). Missing data were imputed in 19 (31%) of the 61 trials. Imputation was part of the primary analysis in 13 trials, but a sensitivity analysis in six. Last value carried forward was used in 12 trials and multiple imputation in two. Following imputation, the most common analysis method was analysis of covariance (10 trials). Conclusion: The majority of studies did not impute missing data and carried out a complete-case analysis. For those studies that did impute missing data, researchers tended to prefer simpler methods of imputation, despite more sophisticated methods being available.The Health Services Research Unit is funded by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health Directorate. Shona Fielding is also currently funded by the Chief Scientist Office on a Research Training Fellowship (CZF/1/31)

Topics: Data Interpretation, Statistical, Models, Statistical, Quality of Life
Publisher: BioMed Central
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:aura.abdn.ac.uk:2164/252
Journal:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2005). A randomised multicentre trial of integrated versus standard treatment for patients with a first episode of psychotic illness. BMJ doi
  2. (2006). A: Self management of arthritis in primary care: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ doi
  3. (2003). Allison DB: Modern statistical methods for handling missing repeated measurements in obesity trial data: Beyond LOCF. Obes Rev doi
  4. (2001). Altman DG: The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet doi
  5. (2005). Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Group: Vitamin E and donepezil for the treatment of mild cognitive impairment. doi
  6. (2005). Chalder T: Cognitive behaviour therapy in addition to antispasmodic treatment for irritable bowel syndrome in primary care: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ doi
  7. (2005). Coyte P: Treatments for paediatric femoral fractures: A randomised trial. Lancet doi
  8. (2002). DB: Statistical Analysis with Missing Data Wiley;
  9. (2002). Design and Analysis of Quality of Life Studies in Clinical Trials Chapman and Hall; doi
  10. (2005). FD: Targets and self monitoring in hypertension: Randomised controlled trial and cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ doi
  11. (1993). Gandek B: SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide.
  12. (1998). Incomplete quality of life data in randomized trials: Missing forms. Stat Med doi
  13. Kenward MG: Missing Data in Clinical doi
  14. (2007). Kenward MG: Missing data in randomised controlled trials – a practical guide.
  15. (2006). KG: Review: A gentle introduction to imputation of missing values. doi
  16. (2006). Long term outcomes from the IMPACT randomised trial for depressed elderly patients in primary care. BMJ
  17. (2006). MD: DHEA in elderly women and DHEA or testosterone in elderly men. doi
  18. (2007). Multiple imputation: Current perspectives. Stat Methods Med Res doi
  19. (2006). NJ: Azathioprine dosed by thiopurine methyltransferase activity for moderate-to-severe atopic eczema: A double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet doi
  20. (2006). Pavord ID: Evidence of a role of tumor necrosis factor alpha in refractory asthma. doi
  21. (2001). Quality of Life: Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation Wiley; doi
  22. (2005). Quetiapine and rivastigmine and cognitive decline in alzheimer's disease: Randomised double blind placebo controlled trial. BMJ
  23. (2006). Randomised controlled trial of a short course of traditional acupuncture compared with usual care for persistent non-specific low back pain. BMJ doi
  24. (2006). Review of guidelines and literature for handling missing data in longitudinal clinical trials with a case study. Pharmaceutical Statistics doi
  25. (2007). Rivero-Arias O: Evaluation of software for multiple imputation of semi-continuous data. Stat Methods Med Res doi
  26. (2005). Sargramostim in Crohn's Disease Study Group: Sargramostim for active crohn's disease. doi
  27. (2006). Severe Alzheimer's Disease Study Group: Donepezil in patients with severe alzheimer's disease: Double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study. Lancet doi
  28. (2004). SG: Are missing outcome data adequately handled? A review of published randomized controlled trials in major medical journals. Clinical Trials doi
  29. (2005). Stabilisation Trial G: Randomised controlled trial to compare surgical stabilisation of the lumbar spine with an intensive rehabilitation programme for patients with chronic low back pain: The MRC spine stabilisation trial. BMJ doi
  30. (2006). TH: Treatment of low back pain by acupressure and physical therapy: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ
  31. (2006). Tolterodine and tamsulosin for treatment of men with lower urinary tract symptoms and overactive bladder: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA doi
  32. (2005). Vandervoort MK: Treatment of ulcerative colitis with a humanized antibody to the alpha4beta7 integrin. doi
  33. (1996). with the EuroQoL Group: EuroQoL: The current state of play. Health Policy doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.