Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

IMPLEmenting a clinical practice guideline for acute low back pain evidence-based manageMENT in general practice (IMPLEMENT) : cluster randomised controlled trial study protocol

By Joanne E. McKenzie, Simon D. French, Denise A. O'Connor, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Duncan Mortimer, Susan Michie, Neil Spike, Peter Schattner, Peter M. Kent, Rachelle Buchbinder, Sally E. Green and Jillian Joy Francis

Abstract

Background: Evidence generated from reliable research is not frequently implemented into clinical practice. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines are a potential vehicle to achieve this. A recent systematic review of implementation strategies of guideline dissemination concluded that there was a lack of evidence regarding effective strategies to promote the uptake of guidelines. Recommendations from this review, and other studies, have suggested the use of interventions that are theoretically based because these may be more effective than those that are not. An evidencebased clinical practice guideline for the management of acute low back pain was recently developed in Australia. This provides an opportunity to develop and test a theory-based implementation intervention for a condition which is common, has a high burden, and for which there is an evidence-practice gap in the primary care setting. Aim: This study aims to test the effectiveness of a theory-based intervention for implementing a clinical practice guideline for acute low back pain in general practice in Victoria, Australia. Specifically, our primary objectives are to establish if the intervention is effective in reducing the percentage of patients who are referred for a plain x-ray, and improving mean level of disability for patients three months post-consultation. Methods/Design: This study protocol describes the details of a cluster randomised controlled trial. Ninety-two general practices (clusters), which include at least one consenting general practitioner, will be randomised to an intervention or control arm using restricted randomisation. Patients aged 18 years or older who visit a participating practitioner for acute non-specific low back pain of less than three months duration will be eligible for inclusion. An average of twenty-five patients per general practice will be recruited, providing a total of 2,300 patient participants. General practitioners in the control arm will receive access to the guideline using the existing dissemination strategy. Practitioners in the intervention arm will be invited to participate in facilitated face-to-face workshops that have been underpinned by behavioural theory. Investigators (not involved in the delivery of the intervention), patients, outcome assessors and the study statistician will be blinded to group allocation. Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN012606000098538 (date registered 14/03/2006).The trial is funded by the NHMRC by way of a Primary Health Care Project Grant (334060). JF has 50% of her time funded by the Chief Scientist Office3/2006). of the Scottish Government Health Directorate and 50% by the University of Aberdeen. PK is supported by a NHMRC Health Professional Fellowship (384366) and RB by a NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship (334010). JG holds a Canada Research Chair in Health Knowledge Transfer and Uptake. All other authors are funded by their own institutions

Topics: Guideline Adherence, Low Back Pain, Practice Guideline, Randomised Controlled Trial
Publisher: BioMed Central
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:aura.abdn.ac.uk:2164/249
Journal:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2000). A quantifiable alternative to double data entry. Control Clin Trials
  2. (1983). A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine
  3. (2000). A: A survey of primary care physician practice patterns and adherence to acute low back problem guidelines. Arch Fam Med
  4. (2001). A: Current and future challenges in the design and analysis of cluster randomization trials. Stat Med
  5. (2003). AC: Inclusion of patients in clinical trial analysis: the intention-to-treat principle.
  6. (2003). Australian Acute Musculoskeletal Pain Guidelines Group (AAMPGG): Evidence-based management of acute musculoskeletal pain
  7. (2004). C: Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess
  8. (1993). CJ: A FearAvoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability. Pain
  9. (2004). CONSORT group : CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ
  10. (2001). CONSORT GROUP (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials): The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med
  11. (1989). Covariate imbalance and random allocation in clinical trials. Stat Med
  12. (1998). Covariate imbalance, adjustment for. In Encyclopedia of biostatistics Edited by: Armitage P, Colton T.
  13. (2005). Croft PR: Comparison of physical treatments versus a brief pain-management programme for back pain in primary care: a randomised clinical trial in physiotherapy practice. Lancet
  14. (1999). Guidelines for low back pain: changes in GP management. Fam Pract
  15. (2005). How do behaviour change techniques map on to psychological constructs? Results of a consensus process. Presented at the European Health Psychology annual conference,
  16. (2000). Influence of postal distribution of the Royal College of Radiologists' guidelines, together with feedback on radiological referral rates, on Xray referrals from general practice: a randomized controlled trial. Fam Pract
  17. (2003). JD: Randomized controlled trial of education and feedback for implementation of guidelines for acute low back pain.
  18. (2008). Keating JL: Can we predict poor recovery from recent-onset nonspecific low back pain? A systematic review. Man Ther
  19. (1998). KF: What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes.
  20. (2008). Kinmonth A: Fidelity of delivery of a physical activity intervention: predictors and consequences. Psychology and Health
  21. (1999). Lipsitz SR: Review of software to fit generalised estimating equation regression models. Am Stat
  22. (2004). Marginal models: Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE). In Applied longitudinal analysis Edited by: Balding DJ, Cressie
  23. Measures for assessing practice change
  24. (2001). Minimal clinically important difference. Low back pain: outcome measures.
  25. (2000). Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: summary and general recommendations. Spine
  26. (1998). Pentz MA: Comparison of population-averaged and subject-specific approaches for analyzing repeated binary outcomes.
  27. (1999). PG: Methods for evaluating area-wide and organisation-based interventions in health and health care: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess
  28. (2006). Piterman L: Primary health care research – essential but disadvantaged.
  29. (2005). Psychological Theory" Group: Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care
  30. (2003). Quantifying Gains in Data Quality for Sampling Plans Used in Clinical Trial Monitoring. Drug Inf J
  31. (1981). Randomization by cluster. Sample size requirements and analysis.
  32. (1994). Randomized controlled trial of the effect of the Royal College of Radiologists' guidelines on general practitioners' referrals for radiographic examination.
  33. (2003). Routine primary care management of acute low back pain: adherence to clinical guidelines. Eur Spine J
  34. S: A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. Health Psychol
  35. (2001). S: Effect of audit and feedback, and reminder messages on primary-care radiology referrals: a randomised trial. Lancet
  36. (2007). S: General practice activity in Australia 2005–06.
  37. (2001). Safety, efficacy, and cost effectiveness of evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute low back pain in primary care. Spine
  38. (2000). Sample size calculations for cluster randomised trials.
  39. (2008). SE: Protocol for economic evaluation alongside the IMPLEMENT cluster randomised controlled trial. Implementation Science
  40. (2002). SL: Analysis of Longitudinal Data Second edition.
  41. (1992). Statistical methods for longitudinal and clustered designs with binary responses. Stat Methods Med Res
  42. (2002). Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: current practice and problems. Stat Med
  43. (2001). Successes and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice. Med Care
  44. (1990). Testing for imbalance of covariates in controlled experiments. Stat Med
  45. (2000). The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine doi
  46. (2004). Treatment Fidelity Workgroup of the NIH Behavior Change Consortium: Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: best practices and recommendations from the NIH Behavior Change Consortium. Health Psychol
  47. (2002). Use of cluster randomised trials in implementation research.
  48. (2004). WD: Low back pain in Australian adults: prevalence and associated disability.
  49. (2003). WD: Low back pain in Australian adults: the economic burden.
  50. (1999). What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials. BMJ
  51. (2006). Wing PC: Knowledge transfer in family physicians managing patients with acute low back pain: a prospective randomized control trial.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.