Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Revealing the burden of maternal mortality : a probabilistic model for determining pregnancy-related causes of death from verbal autopsies

By Edward Fottrell, Peter Byass, Thomas W. Ouedraogo, Cecile Tamini, Adjima Gbangou, Issiaka Sombié, Ulf Högberg, Karen H. Witten, Sohinee Bhattacharya, Teklay Desta, Sylvia Deganus, Janet Tornui, Ann E. Fitzmaurice, Nicolas Meda and Wendy Graham


Background: Substantial reductions in maternal mortality are called for in Millennium Development Goal 5 (MDG-5), thus assuming that maternal mortality is measurable. A key difficulty is attributing causes of death for the many women who die unaided in developing countries. Verbal autopsy (VA) can elicit circumstances of death, but data need to be interpreted reliably and consistently to serve as global indicators. Recent developments in probabilistic modelling of VA interpretation are adapted and assessed here for the specific circumstances of pregnancy-related death. Methods: A preliminary version of the InterVA-M probabilistic VA interpretation model was developed and refined with adult female VA data from several sources, and then assessed against 258 additional VA interviews from Burkina Faso. Likely causes of death produced by the model were compared with causes previously determined by local physicians. Distinction was made between free-text and closed-question data in the VA interviews, to assess the added value of free-text material on the model's output. Results: Following rationalisation between the model and physician interpretations, cause-specific mortality fractions were broadly similar. Case-by-case agreement between the model and any of the reviewing physicians reached approximately 60%, rising to approximately 80% when cases with a discrepancy were reviewed by an additional physician. Cardiovascular disease and malaria showed the largest differences between the methods, and the attribution of infections related to pregnancy also varied. The model estimated 30% of deaths to be pregnancy-related, of which half were due to direct causes. Data derived from free-text made no appreciable difference. Conclusion: InterVA-M represents a potentially valuable new tool for measuring maternal mortality in an efficient, consistent and standardised way. Further development, refinement and validation are planned. It could become a routine tool in research and service settings where levels and changes in pregnancy-related deaths need to be measured, for example in assessing progress towards MDG-5.This work was undertaken as part of an international research programme – IMMPACT (Initiative for Maternal Mortality Programme Assessment), funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Department for International Development, the European Commission and USAID

Publisher: BioMed Central
Year: 2007
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (1998). A comparison of three verbal autopsy methods to ascertain levels and causes of maternal deaths in Matlab,
  2. (2006). Assessing a new approach to verbal autopsy interpretation in a rural Ethiopian community: the InterVA model. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation
  3. (2001). CM: Measuring the local burden of disease: a study of life lost in rural Burkina Faso.
  4. (2005). GL: Evaluation of neonatal verbal autopsy using physician review versus algorithm-based cause of death assignment in rural Nepal. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology doi
  5. (2003). GL: Validation of verbal autopsy to determine the cause of 137 neonatal deaths in Karachi, Pakistan. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology doi
  6. (2003). HV: A probabilistic approach to interpreting verbal autopsies: methodology and preliminary validation in Vietnam.
  7. (1998). Maternal Mortality Overview.
  8. (2002). Now or never: the case for measuring maternal mortality. Lancet
  9. (1994). O'Dempsey TJ, Greenwood BM: The limitations of verbal autopsy in a malaria-endemic region. Annals of Tropical Paediatrics
  10. (2003). Patterns of adult and old-age mortality in rural Burkina Faso.
  11. (2001). place and time- but who, where, and when?
  12. (2006). Potential and limits of verbal autopsies. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation 2006, 84:164.yours — you keep the copyright Submit your manuscript here: BioMedcentral Page
  13. (2006). Raggers H: How should we measure maternal mortality in the developing world? A comparison of household deaths and sibling history approaches. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation
  14. (1998). RJ: The validity of verbal autopsies for assessing the causes of institutional maternal death. Studies in Family Planning
  15. (1997). The effect of misclassification error on reported cause-specific mortality fractions from verbal autopsy.
  16. (2004). the Numbers: Reviewing maternal deaths and complications to make pregnancy safer.
  17. UNFPA: Estimates of maternal mortality.
  18. (2000). Validation and application of verbal autopsies in a rural area of South Africa. Tropical Medicine and International Health
  19. (2006). Verbal autopsy procedure for adult deaths. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.