Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Experimental evidence of a sunk–cost paradox : a study of pricing behavior in Bertrand–Edgeworth duopoly

By Steve Buchheit and Nick Feltovich


A well–known implication of microeconomic theory is that sunk costs should have no effect on decision making. We test this hypothesis with a human–subjects experiment. Students recruited from graduate business courses, with an average of over six years of work experience, played the role of firms in a repeated price–setting duopoly game in which both firms had identical capacity\ud constraints and costs, including a sunk cost that varied across experimental sessions over six different values. We find, contrary to the prediction of microeconomic theory, that subjects’ pricing decisions show sizable differences across treatments. The effect of the sunk cost is non–monotonic: as it increases from low to medium levels, average prices decrease, but as it increases from medium to high levels, average prices increase. These effects are not apparent initially, but develop quickly and persist throughout the game. Cachon and Camerer’s (1996) loss avoidance is consistent with\ud both effects, while cost–based pricing predicts only the latter effect, and is inconsistent with the former

Topics: oligopoly, posted prices, capacity constraints, loss avoidance, cost–based pricing
Year: 2008
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2002). A critical overview of the use of full–cost data for planning and pricing,”
  2. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification,”
  3. (1973). A simple model of imperfect competition, where 4 are few and 6 are many,”
  4. (1993). A Survey of Management Accounting Practices in UK Manufacturing Companies,
  5. (1993). Asset markets as an equilibrium selection mechanism: coordination failure, game form auctions and tacit communication,” doi
  6. (1996). Avoidable cost: ride a double auction roller coaster,”
  7. (2007). Bankruptcy and product–market competition in the airline industry,” working paper,
  8. (2003). Caring about sunk costs: a behavioural solution to holdup problems with small stakes,”
  9. (1999). Common value auctions with insider information,”
  10. (1996). Do cosmetic reporting variations affect market behaviour?”
  11. (1999). Do cost–based pricing biases persist in laboratory markets?” doi
  12. (1997). Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses,”
  13. (1986). End behaviour in sequences of finite prisoner’s dilemma supergames: a learning theory approach,”
  14. (1991). Entry and competition in concentrated markets,”
  15. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model,”
  16. (1999). Experimental sealed bid first price auctions with directly observed bid functions,”
  17. (1993). Forward induction in the battle–of– the–sexes games,”
  18. (1995). How manufacturers price products,”
  19. (2007). Imitation–theory and experimental evidence,”
  20. (1985). In search of predatory pricing,”
  21. (2005). Learning direction theory and the winner’s curse,”
  22. (2003). Learning to bid—an experimental study of bid function adjustments in auctions and fair division games,”
  23. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: a reference–dependent model,”
  24. (1996). Loss avoidance and forward induction in experimental coordination games,”
  25. (1984). Market contestability in the presence of sunk (entry) costs,”
  26. (2007). Market forces meet behavioral biases: cost misallocation and irrational pricing,” forthcoming,
  27. (2003). Newsvendor bounds and heuristic for optimal policies in serial supply chains,”
  28. (1988). Nonparametric Statistics for the behavioural Sciences, McGraw–Hill,
  29. (1988). Predatory pricing in a multiple–market experiment: a note,”
  30. (2000). Price competition and market concentration: an experimental study,”
  31. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under
  32. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects,”
  33. (1992). The calculation of equilibrium mixed strategies
  34. (2005). The dynamics of price dispersion, or Edgeworth variations,”
  35. (1959). The effects of severity of initiation on liking for a group,”
  36. (1995). The information content of losses,”
  37. (1987). The psychology of choice and the assumptions of economics,”
  38. (1925). The pure theory of monopoly,” in Papers Relating to Political Economy,
  39. (2006). The role of accruals in asymmetrically timely game and loss recognition,”
  40. (2002). Two or four firms: does it matter,”

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.