Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Developing the content of two behavioural interventions : using theory-based interventions to promote GP management of upper respiratory tract infection without prescribing antibiotics #1

By Susan Hrisos, Martin P. Eccles, Marie Johnston, Eileen F. Kaner, Nick Steen, Jeremy Grimshaw and Jillian Joy Francis


Background: Evidence shows that antibiotics have limited effectiveness in the management of upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) yet GPs continue to prescribe antibiotics. Implementation research does not currently provide a strong evidence base to guide the choice of interventions to promote the uptake of such evidence-based practice by health professionals. While systematic reviews demonstrate that interventions to change clinical practice can be effective, heterogeneity between studies hinders generalisation to routine practice. Psychological models of behaviour change that have been used successfully to predict variation in behaviour in the general population can also predict the clinical behaviour of healthcare professionals. The purpose of this study was to design two theoretically-based interventions to promote the management of upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) without prescribing antibiotics. Method: Interventions were developed using a systematic, empirically informed approach in which we: selected theoretical frameworks; identified modifiable behavioural antecedents that predicted GPs intended and actual management of URTI; mapped these target antecedents on to evidence-based behaviour change techniques; and operationalised intervention components in a format suitable for delivery by postal questionnaire. Results: We identified two psychological constructs that predicted GP management of URTI: "Self-efficacy," representing belief in one's capabilities, and "Anticipated consequences," representing beliefs about the consequences of one's actions. Behavioural techniques known to be effective in changing these beliefs were used in the design of two paper-based, interactive interventions. Intervention 1 targeted self-efficacy and required GPs to consider progressively more difficult situations in a "graded task" and to develop an "action plan" of what to do when next presented with one of these situations. Intervention 2 targeted anticipated consequences and required GPs to respond to a "persuasive communication" containing a series of pictures representing the consequences of managing URTI with and without antibiotics. Conclusion: It is feasible to systematically develop theoretically-based interventions to change professional practice. Two interventions were designed that differentially target generalisable constructs predictive of GP management of URTI. Our detailed and scientific rationale for the choice and design of our interventions will provide a basis for understanding any effects identified in their evaluation. Trial registration: NCT00376142This study is funded by the European Commission Research Directorate as part of a multi-partner program: Research Based Education and Quality Improvement (ReBEQI): A Framework and tools to develop effective quality improvement programs in European healthcare. (Proposal No: QLRT-2001-00657)

Topics: Beliefs, Evidence-based Medicine, Models, Psychological, Physician's Practice Patterns
Publisher: BioMed Central
Year: 2008
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2000). A framework for development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health.
  2. Antibiotic prescribing behavior Vol 4.
  3. (2004). Antiobiotics for sore throat. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
  4. (1998). Beta-blockers and antithrombotic treatment for secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart
  5. Can psychological models bridge the gap between clinical guidelines and clinicians' behaviour? A randomised controlled trial of an intervention to influence dentists' intention to implement evidence-based practice. doi
  6. (2001). Changing provider behaviour: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care.
  7. Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote implementation of research findings by health care professionals.
  8. (2004). Delayed antibiotics for symptoms and complications of respiratory infections. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
  9. (2006). Do self-reported intentions predict clinicians' behaviour: a systematic review. Implementation Science.
  10. Effects of quality improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes on glycemic control.
  11. Guiding the design and selection of interventions to influence the implementation of evidence-based practice: an experimental simulation of a complex intervention trial. Soc Sci Med.
  12. (2005). How do behaviour change techniques map on to psychological constructs? Results of a consensus process.
  13. Impact of clinical trials on clinical practice: example of thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction.
  14. Individual variation between general practitioners in labelling of hypertension.
  15. (1995). No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. Can Med Assoc
  16. Predicting the clinical course of suspected acute viral upper respiratory tract infection in children. Fam Pract.
  17. Salient beliefs and intentions to prescribe antiobiotics for patients with a sore throat.
  18. Self-efficacy: towards a unifying theory of behaviour change. doi
  19. (1998). The appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy.
  20. (2003). The use of psychological theories in clinical guideline implementation research (PhD Thesis):
  21. (2007). Translating clinicians' beliefs into implementation interventions (TRACII): a protocol for an intervention modelling experiment to change clinicians' intentions to implement evidence-based practice. Implementation Science.
  22. Use of secondary prophylaxis against myocardial infarction in the North of England.
  23. Variations in the use of medical and surgical services by the Medicare population.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.