Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Involvement in treatment decision making : its meaning to people with diabetes and implications for conceptualisation

By Vikki Entwistle, Zoe Christina Skea, Jillian Joy Francis and Maria Prior


Patient involvement in decision-making is widely regarded as an important feature of good-quality healthcare. Policy-makers have been particularly concerned to ensure that patients are informed about and enabled to choose between relevant treatment options, but it is not clear how patients understand and value involvement. We investigated the meaning of involvement in treatment decision-making for people with diabetes. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 people aged between 20 and 79 who had type 1 or type 2 diabetes selected from 4 multi-practitioner outpatient clinics in the Grampian area of Scotland. We used several strategies to probe their understandings of involvement, including a discussion of how they would respond to a question about involvement in treatment decisions that appears on the National Patient Survey used to monitor the quality of healthcare in England. Participants associated involvement in decision-making with a number of features relating to the ethos and feel of healthcare encounters (welcoming; respectful; facilitative of patients’ contributions; and non-judgemental); communication about health problems (practitioners attending to patients’ views and patients feeling listened to; practitioners giving clear explanations based on their professional knowledge and patients understanding these); and communication about treatments (practitioners explaining treatment rationales in ways that patients understand and enabling patients to feel they have a say). Our findings have implications for practical attempts to involve patients in decisions about their care and for the conceptualisation and assessment of patient involvement. They suggest that practitioners who aspire to facilitate patient involvement should attend to the ethos they foster in consultations and the way they discuss problems as well as to the provision of information about treatment options and the scope patients have to influence decisions. Models and taxonomies of patient involvement in decision-making need to be developed to accommodate both problem-solving phases and the relational and subjective dimensions of involvement.Peer reviewedAuthor versio

Topics: Decision Making, Patient Participation, RA Public aspects of medicine
Publisher: Elsevier
Year: 2007
DOI identifier: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.09.001
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. (2001). A measure of informed choice. doi
  2. (2006). A shared treatment decision-making approach between patients with chronic conditions and their clinicians: the case of diabetes. doi
  3. (2006). An informed decision? Breast cancer patients and their knowledge about treatment. Patient Education and Counseling,
  4. (2003). Are patients’ decision-making preferences being met?
  5. (2004). Assessing patients’ participation and quality of decision-making: insights from a study of routine practice in diverse settings. Patient Education and Counseling,
  6. (2001). Assessing the roles that people play in decisions about their healthcare: A study of women’s interpretations of two measures of control.
  7. (2002). Autonomy and trust in bioethics. Cambridge: doi
  8. (2005). Conscientious autonomy: displacing decisions in healthcare. doi
  9. (2006). Considerations of ‘fit’ and patient involvement in decisionmaking.
  10. (2001). Consumers’ views of quality in the consultation and their relevance to ‘shared decision-making’ approaches. Health Expectations,
  11. (2005). Exploring the decision-making preferences of people with colorectal cancer.
  12. (2006). Information that is not exchanged during consultations: significance for decision-making. Social Science &Medicine,
  13. (2001). Myth of empowerment in chronic illness.
  14. (2004). Patient empowerment. Critical Care Nursing Quarterly,
  15. (2006). Patient involvement in treatment decision-making: the case for a broader conceptual framework. Patient Education and Counseling,
  16. (2006). Patients’ preference for involvement in medical decision-making: a narrative review. Patient Education and Counseling,
  17. (2005). Patients’ preferences for involvement in clinical decision-making within secondary care and the factors that influence their preferences.
  18. (2005). Primary care trust survey: key findings report, appendices. (accessed 07/11/2006) Health Care Commission
  19. (2006). Shared decision-making in primary care: tailoring the Charles et al. model to fit the context of general practice. Patient Education and Counseling, doi
  20. (2007). The meaning of patient involvement and participation in healthcare consultations: a taxonomy.
  21. (2005). The OPTION scale: measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks.
  22. (2005). Unilateral’ and ‘Bilateral’ practitioner approaches to decision-making.
  23. (2003). What do patients value in their hospital care? An empirical perspective on autonomy centred bioethics. doi
  24. (2006). Which surgical decisions should patients participate in? Reflections on women’s recollections of discussions about different types of hysterectomy.
  25. (2004). Women’s preferences for and views on decision-making for diagnostic tests.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.