Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Looking inside the black box : a theory-based process evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial of printed educational materials (the Ontario printed educational message, OPEM) to improve referral and prescribing practices in primary care in Ontario, Canada

By Jeremy Grimshaw, Merrick Zwarenstein, Jacqueline Tetroe, Gaston Godin, Ian D. Graham, Louise Lemyre, Martin P. Eccles, Marie Johnston, Jan Hux, Keith O'Rourke, France Legare, Justin Presseau and Jillian Joy Francis

Abstract

Background: Randomised controlled trials of implementation strategies tell us whether (or not) an intervention results in changes in professional behaviour but little about the causal mechanisms that produce any change. Theory-based process evaluations collect data on theoretical constructs alongside randomised trials to explore possible causal mechanisms and effect modifiers. This is similar to measuring intermediate endpoints in clinical trials to further understand the biological basis of any observed effects (for example, measuring lipid profiles alongside trials of lipid lowering drugs where the primary endpoint could be reduction in vascular related deaths). This study protocol describes a theory-based process evaluation alongside the Ontario Printed Educational Message (OPEM) trial. We hypothesize that the OPEM interventions are most likely to operate through changes in physicians' behavioural intentions due to improved attitudes or subjective norms with little or no change in perceived behavioural control. We will test this hypothesis using a well-validated social cognition model, the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) that incorporates these constructs. Methods/design: We will develop theory-based surveys using standard methods based upon the TPB for the second and third replications, and survey a subsample of Ontario family physicians from each arm of the trial two months before and six months after the dissemination of the index edition of informed, the evidence based newsletter used for the interventions. In the third replication, our study will converge with the "TRY-ME" protocol (a second study conducted alongside the OPEM trial), in which the content of educational messages was constructed using both standard methods and methods informed by psychological theory. We will modify Dillman's total design method to maximise response rates. Preliminary analyses will initially assess the internal reliability of the measures and use regression to explore the relationships between predictor and dependent variable (intention to advise diabetic patients to have annual retinopathy screening and to prescribe thiazide diuretics for first line treatment of uncomplicated hypertension). We will then compare groups using methods appropriate for comparing independent samples to determine whether there have been changes in the predicted constructs (attitudes, subjective norms, or intentions) across the study groups as hypothesised, and will assess the convergence between the process evaluation results and the main trial results.The OPEM trial and OPEM process evaluation are funded by the Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR). The OPEM process evaluation study was developed as part of the CIHR funded interdisciplinary capacity enhancement team KT-ICEBeRG. Gaston Godin, Jeremy Grimshaw and France Légaré hold Canada Research Chairs. Louise Lemyre holds an R.S. McLaughlin Research Chair

Topics: Clinical Competence, Psychological Theory, Teaching Materials
Publisher: BioMed Central
Year: 2007
OAI identifier: oai:aura.abdn.ac.uk:2164/180
Journal:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1998). Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group. BMJ
  2. (2004). Constructing questionnaires based on the theory of planned behaviour. In A manual for health services researchers Centre for Health Services Research,
  3. (2002). DT: Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference Boston: Houghton-Mifflin;
  4. (2004). Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess
  5. (1999). for Reviews and Dissemination: Getting evidence into practice. Effective Health Care Bulletin
  6. (2002). Higgins JP: How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? Stat Med
  7. (1992). Horwitz RJ: Problems in the conduct and analysis of randomized clinical trials.
  8. (1991). Kulkin IL: Monitoring nursing interventions and data collection in a randomized clinical trial.
  9. (2000). Mail and internet surveys.
  10. (1999). Nelder JA: Generalized linear models London:
  11. (2007). O"Rourke K: Meta-Analysis. In Modern Epidemiology 3rd edition. Edited by: Rothman KJ,
  12. (2003). Practice based, longitudinal, qualitative interview study of computerised evidence based guidelines in primary care. BMJ
  13. (2001). SM: Improving the quality of health care in the United Kingdom and the United States: a framework for change. The Milbank Quarterly
  14. (2002). Surveying Physicians. Do components of the"Total Design Approach" to optimizing survey response rates apply to physicians? Med Care
  15. (2006). Testing a TheoRYinformed MEssage ("TRY-ME"): A Sub-trial Within a Randomized Controlled Trial of Printed Educational Materials (The Ontario Printed Educational Message (OPEM) Trial). Implementation Science
  16. (2000). The design and analysis of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate computerized decision support in primary care: the COGENT study. Fam Pract
  17. (1996). The theory of planned behavior: a review of its applications to health-related behaviors.
  18. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Process
  19. (2001). TR: Reported response rates to mailed physician questionnaires. Health Services Research
  20. (1998). Wermuth N: Multivariate dependencies: models, analysis, and interpretation Chapman and Hall Ltd;

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.