Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Economic evaluation of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer

By Robyn De Verteuil, Rodolfo Andrés Hernández, Luke David Vale and Aberdeen Health Technology Assessment Group


Objectives: To assess the cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery compared with open surgery for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Methods: A Markov model was developed to model cost-effectiveness over 25 years. Data on the clinical effectiveness of laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer were obtained from a systematic review of the literature. Data on costs came from a systematic review of economic evaluations and from published sources. The outcomes of the model were presented as the incremental cost per life year gained and using cost-effectiveness acceptability curves (CEACs) to illustrate the likelihood that a treatment was cost-effective at various threshold values for society’s willingness to pay for an additional life year. Results: Laparoscopic surgery was on average £300 more costly and slightly less effective than open surgery and had a 30% chance of being cost-effective if society is willing to pay £30,000 for a life year. One interpretation of the available data suggests equal survival and disease-free survival. Making this assumption, laparoscopic surgery had a greater chance of being considered cost-effective. Presenting the results as incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) made no difference to the results, as utility data were poor. Evidence suggests short-term benefits following laparoscopic repair. This benefit would have to be at least 0.01 of a QALY for laparoscopic surgery to be considered cost-effective. \ud Conclusions: Laparoscopic surgery is likely to be associated with short-term quality of life benefits, similar long-term outcomes and an additional £300 per patient. A judgement is required as to whether the short-term benefits are worth this extra cost.Peer reviewedAuthor versio

Topics: Colorectal Neoplasma, Economic Evaluation, Laparoscopy, Cost-effectiveness, Markov modelling, Colorectal cancer, Systematic Review, RC Internal medicine
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Year: 2007
DOI identifier: 10.1017/S0266462307070559
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. A systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. 2000; Available at:
  2. (1997). Adjuvant chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil and levamisole) in Dukes' B and C colorectal carcinoma. A costeffectiveness analysis. Ann Oncol. doi
  3. (2006). Available at: Accessed
  4. Clinical effectiveness and costeffectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation. Health Technology Assessment.
  5. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. doi
  6. (2001). for Clinical Excellence. Guidance for manufacturers and sponsors.
  7. (2006). for Health and Clinical Excellence. Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: doi
  8. Groin Hernia Trial Group. Cost-utility analysis of open versus laparoscopic groin hernia repair: results from a multicentre randomized clinical trial. doi
  9. Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. doi
  10. (2002). Laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal carcinoma: a prospective clinical trial involving 157 cases with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. doi
  11. Laparoscopically assisted versus open colectomy for colon cancer - a meta analysis. Arch Surg. doi
  12. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. doi
  13. (2005). NHS reference costs 2006; Available at: NHSReferenceCosts/fs/en. Accessed
  14. (2004). Prospective comparison of laparoscopic vs. open resections for colorectal adenocarcinoma over a ten-year period. Dis Colon Rectum. doi
  15. Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme. doi
  16. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. doi
  17. The COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. doi
  18. Treatment strategy for patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous irresectable liver metastases. doi
  19. (2006). UK Bowel Cancer Statistics. doi
  20. Wound complications of laparoscopic vs open colectomy. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.