Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

NorthStar, a support tool for the design and evaluation of quality improvement interventions in healthcare

By Elie A. Akl, Shaun Treweek, Robbie Foy, Andrew D. Oxman, ReBEQI Group and Jillian Joy Francis

Abstract

Background: The Research-Based Education and Quality Improvement (ReBEQI) European partnership aims to establish a framework and provide practical tools for the selection, implementation, and evaluation of quality improvement (QI) interventions. We describe the development and preliminary evaluation of the software tool NorthStar, a major product of the ReBEQI project. Methods: We focused the content of NorthStar on the design and evaluation of QI interventions. A lead individual from the ReBEQI group drafted each section, and at least two other group members reviewed it. The content is based on published literature, as well as material developed by the ReBEQI group. We developed the software in both a Microsoft Windows HTML help system version and a web-based version. In a preliminary evaluation, we surveyed 33 potential users about the acceptability and perceived utility of NorthStar. Results: NorthStar consists of 18 sections covering the design and evaluation of QI interventions. The major focus of the intervention design sections is on how to identify determinants of practice (factors affecting practice patterns), while the major focus of the intervention evaluation sections is on how to design a cluster randomised trial. The two versions of the software can be transferred by email or CD, and are available for download from the internet. The software offers easy navigation and various functions to access the content. Potential users (55% response rate) reported above-moderate levels of confidence in carrying out QI research related tasks if using NorthStar, particularly when developing a protocol for a cluster randomised trial Conclusion: NorthStar is an integrated, accessible, practical, and acceptable tool to assist developers and evaluators of QI interventions

Topics: Quality in Health Care, Physician's Practice Patterns
Publisher: BioMed Central
Year: 2007
OAI identifier: oai:aura.abdn.ac.uk:2164/155
Journal:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. C: Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, doi
  2. Establishing a scientific rationale for choosing interventions to translate research findings into clinical practice: The PR1ME project.
  3. (2001). Improving the Quality of Medical Care: Building Bridges Among Professional Pride, Payer Profit, and Patient Satisfaction. JAMA doi
  4. M: A software tool to support the writing of protocols for pragmatic randomised controlled trials. doi
  5. (1999). Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: ‘Best practice’: State of the art and perspectives in the EU for improving the effectiveness and efficiency of European health systems. Luxembourg , European Commission;
  6. (1997). Personal paper: Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice. BMJ doi
  7. (2003). PRocess modelling in ImpleMEntation research: selecting a theoretical basis for interventions to change clinical practice.
  8. Research-Based Education and Quality Improvement doi
  9. Research-based Education and Quality Improvement (ReBEQI)
  10. The ReBEQI group and project management
  11. The ReBEQI group and project management [ h t t p : /
  12. (2001). Why does primary care need more implementation research? Family Practice doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.