Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Earnings Aspirations and Job Satisfaction: The Affective and Cognitive Impact of Earnings Comparisons

By Ioannis Theodossiou and Georgios A. Panos


Theories of interdependent preferences predicts that the effect of peer earnings on individual well-being is either negative, the “relative deprivation”, or positive the “cognitive effect”. The evidence so far has attributed the dominance of each of the above effects on the country’s economic and political environment. This study claims that relative earnings can affect job satisfaction in two opposite ways, through the affective, “relative deprivation”, and the cognitive channel. The dominance of each effect depends on the individual-specific financial situation rather than the country’s environment. Utilising a longitudinal dataset for British employees, the results of this study show that the cognitive informational effect of “peer earnings” dominates social comparisons for those in financial distress. It further suggests job satisfaction is a relative concept

Topics: Earnings, Job Satisfaction, Financial Vulnerability, Reference Group
Year: 2007
OAI identifier:

Suggested articles


  1. 1899, “The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions”, MacMillian,
  2. 2004[a], “When Information Dominates Comparison: Learning from Russian Subjective Panel Data”, doi
  3. 2004[b], “Relativizing Relative Income”, Delta Working Paper 2004-17,
  4. (1995). A Depressed Labor Market as Explained by Participants”,
  5. (1975). A Statistical Model for the Analysis of Ordinal-Level Dependent Variables”, doi
  6. (1980). A Theory of Social Custom of Which Unemployment May Be One Consequence”, doi
  7. (1964). Adaptation-Level Theory”, doi
  8. (1980). Analysis of Covariance with Qualitative Data”, doi
  9. (1999). Are Wages Habit-Forming? Evidence from Micro Data”, doi
  10. (1980). Asset Accumulation and Economic Activity”, doi
  11. (2005). Calling on Friends and Relatives: Social Capital”, published
  12. (1998). Comparison Concave Utility and Following Behaviour in Social and Economic Settings”, doi
  13. (2004). Confronting Objections to Performance Pay: An Analysis of the Incentives – Job Satisfaction Relationship After Controlling for Endogeneity”, Mimeo, doi
  14. (2002). Deconstructing job satisfaction: Separating evaluations, beliefs and affective experiences”,
  15. (2001). Do People Mean What they Say? Implications for Subjective Survey Data”, doi
  16. (1991). Do Workers Prefer Increasing Wage Profiles?”, doi
  17. (1974). Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence”, in
  18. (2003). Earnings and Job Satisfaction: An Application of Aspiration Level Models using Panel Data from the British Labour Market”, MSc Dissertation,
  19. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross-Section and Panel Data”, doi
  20. (1977). Economic Aspects of Job Satisfaction”, in: Ashenfelter
  21. (1990). Establishment Size, Job Satisfaction and the Structure of Work”, doi
  22. (2002). Estimates of the Effect of Wages on Job Satisfaction”, LSE Working Papers, Center for Economic Performance
  23. (1989). Frames of Reference and the Quality of Life”,
  24. (1973). Further Evidence on the Individual Welfare Function of Income: An Empirical Investigation in the Netherlands”, doi
  25. (2003). Happiness: Has Social Science a Clue?”, Lionel Robbins Memorial Lectures 2002/03, London School of Economics.
  26. (1971). Hedonic Relativism and Planning the Good Society”, in: Appley
  27. (2004). How Important is Methodology for the Estimates of the Determinants of Happiness”, doi
  28. (1964). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis”, doi
  29. (1993). Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem”,
  30. (2001). Income and Happiness: Towards a Unified Theory”, doi
  31. (2005). Income and Well-Being: An Empirical Analysis of the Comparison Income Effect”, doi
  32. (2003). Income satisfaction inequality and its causes”, doi
  33. (1949). Income, Savings and the Theory of Consumer Behavior”, doi
  34. (1958). Investment in Human Capital and Personal Income Distribution”, doi
  35. (1991). Is Happiness Relative?”, doi
  36. (1996). Is Job Satisfaction U-shaped in Age?”, doi
  37. (2005). Job Satisfaction and Gender Segregation," doi
  38. (1997). Job Satisfaction and Gender: Why are women so happy at work?” doi
  39. (1999). Job Satisfaction and Preference Drift”, doi
  40. (1997). Job Satisfaction and Target Earnings”, doi
  41. (1978). Job Satisfaction as an Economic Variable”, doi
  42. (1996). Job Satisfaction in Britain”, doi
  43. (2005). Job Satisfaction of the Highly Educated: The Role of Gender, Comparison Earnings, and Academic Tenure", doi
  44. (2000). Job Satisfaction, doi
  45. (1979). Job Satisfaction, Wages and Unions”, doi
  46. (1988). Job Switching and Job Satisfaction in the U.S. Labor Market”, doi
  47. (2005). Jobs as Lancaster Goods: Facets of Job Satisfaction and Overall Job Satisfaction”, Mimeo, Université Pantheon-Assas doi
  48. (2005). Low Pay, Higher Pay and Job Satisfaction within the European Union: Empirical Evidence from Fourteen Countries”,
  49. (2004). Lower Pay,
  50. (2005). Neighbors as Negatives: Relative Earnings and Well-Being”, doi
  51. (1978). On the Pooling of Time-Series and Cross Section Data”, doi
  52. (2001). On the Validity of Utility Statements: Standard Theory versus Duesenberry’s”, doi
  53. (1991). Ordinal and Cardinal Utility: an Integration of the Two Dimensions of the Welfare Concept”, doi
  54. (1999). Personality and subjective well-being”, in: doi
  55. (1971). Political and Economic Evaluation of Social Effects and
  56. (1981). Prices and Quantities: A Macroeconomic Analysis”, doi
  57. (1981). Race Differences in Job Satisfaction: A Reappraisal”, doi
  58. (1966). Relative Deprivation and Social Justice”, Routredge and Kegan. doi
  59. (2001). Relative-income Effects on Subjective Well-Being in the Cross-Section”, doi
  60. (2004). Reported Job Satisfaction: What Does it Mean?”, doi
  61. (1996). Satisfaction and Comparison Income”, doi
  62. (2002). Social Capital in Theory and Practice: Where Do We Stand?”, published doi
  63. (1993). Subjective well-being: the convergence and stability of self and non self report measures”, doi
  64. (2003). The Anatomy of Subjective WellBeing”, doi
  65. (2001). The Changing Distribution of Job Satisfaction”, doi
  66. (1973). The Changing Tolerance for Income Inequality in doi
  67. (1998). The Effects of Low-Pay and Unemployment on Psychological Well-Being: A Logistic Regression Approach”, doi
  68. (2004). The Estimation of Job Satisfaction with Endogenous Income",
  69. (1997). The Frame of Reference as a Public Good”, doi
  70. (2005). The Part-Time Pay Penalty”, doi
  71. (1996). The Relationship Between Job Satisfaction and Managerial Remuneration doi
  72. (1985). The relativity of Utility: Evidence from Panel Data”, The Review of Economics and Statistics 67, 2,(May doi
  73. (1993). The Role of Fairness in Wage Determination”, doi
  74. (2004). The role of Income Aspirations in Individual Happiness”, doi
  75. (1958). The Strategy of Economic Development”, doi
  76. (2000). W a r d M . a n d P . J . S l o a n e , doi
  77. (1993). Wages, Seniority, and the Demand for Rising Consumption Profiles”, doi
  78. (2004). Well-Being Over Time in Britain and the USA”, doi
  79. (2001). What Has Been Happening to Job Satisfaction in
  80. (2001). What Really Matters in a Job? Hedonic Measurement using Quit Data”, doi
  81. (2005). Who Cares About Relative Deprivation?”, The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper Series No. doi
  82. (2000). Who Wants to Redistribute? The Tunnel Effect in 1990s Russia”, doi
  83. (1998). Why are the Unemployed so Unhappy? Evidence from Panel Data”, doi
  84. (2004). Workpackage 4: Conventional, Report to the European Union.
  85. (1997). World Development Report doi
  86. (2000). World Development Report 2000/01”, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.