Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Irregularly Obtained Real Evidence: The Scottish Solution?

By Peter Duff

Abstract

In determining whether to admit improperly obtained real evidence, the Scottish courts have engaged in a balancing act for over 50 years, weighing the public interest in the conviction of the guilty against the rights of the accused and the civil liberties of the citizenry. The Appeal Court's approach to this issue has not been particularly satisfactory and the result is an incoherent mass of detailed and often almost irreconcilable case law, rather than a principled framework to guide the trial courts in the exercise of this power

Topics: Criminal evidence, Scots Law
Publisher: Vathek Publishing
Year: 2004
OAI identifier: oai:aura.abdn.ac.uk:2164/41
Journal:

Suggested articles


To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.