Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Is it Easier to Escape from Low Pay in Urban Areas? Evidence from the UK

By Euan Cartner Phimister, Ioannis Theodossiou, Richard Upward and Centre for European Labour Market Research

Abstract

In this paper we compare periods of low pay employment between urban and rural areas in the UK. Using the British Household Panel Survey, we estimate the probability that a period of low pay employment will end allowing for a number of possible outcomes, namely to a ‘high pay’ job, self-employment, unemployment and out of the labour force. The results show that there are statistically significant differences in the dynamics of low pay across urban and rural labour markets, particularly in terms of exits to high pay and out of the labour force. After controlling for different personal and job characteristics across markets, urban low pay durations are somewhat shorter on average, with a higher probability that urban workers will move to high pay. However, the results suggest that any urban-rural differences in the typical low pay experience are particularly concentrated among certain types of individuals, e.g. young workers, women without qualifications.Preprin

Topics: HD Industries. Land use. Labor
Publisher: University of Aberdeen Business School
Year: 2004
OAI identifier: oai:aura.abdn.ac.uk:2164/13
Journal:

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1996). An Empirical Model of Sectoral Movements by Unemployed Workers” doi
  2. and G.Broom 1993, The Economy and Rural England. (Rural Development Commission,
  3. and Ioannis Theodossiou.1996 “Earnings Mobility, Family Income and Low Pay”, doi
  4. (2000). Are Spells of Unemployment Longer in Nonmetropolitan Areas? Nonparametric and semiparametric evidence” doi
  5. (1995). Deprivation, Poverty and marginalization in Rural Lifestyles in England and Wales” doi
  6. (1998). Earnings Mobility of Low Paid Workers doi
  7. (1995). Easy estimation methods for discrete-time duration models” doi
  8. (1998). Employment opportunities in rural areas: implications for poverty in a changing policy environment”, doi
  9. (1997). Farm production policy versus rural life policy”, doi
  10. (1999). Firm Size and Wages” doi
  11. (1990). Flexible parametric estimation of duration and competing risk models “ doi
  12. (1981). Heterogeneity and State Dependence”,
  13. (1992). Job mobility and the careers of young men” doi
  14. (1995). Labour markets and employment opportunities in rural doi
  15. (1999). Learning in Cities” doi
  16. (1958). Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations” doi
  17. (1998). On the precipice of reform: welfare spell durations for rural female headed families”, doi
  18. (1978). Regression analysis of grouped survival data with application to breast cancer” doi
  19. (1999). Rural Economies. Report of the Performance and Innovation Unit.
  20. (2001). Search, Sorting and Urban Agglomeration” doi
  21. (2001). Stata Statistical Software: Release 7.0. (College Station, TX:Stata Corporation.) Stewart,
  22. (1997). The dynamics of low pay and unemployment in early 1990’s Britain. (Institute for Fiscal Studies and Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
  23. (2000). The dynamics of low pay in rural households: Exploratory analysis using the British Household Panel” doi
  24. (1995). The economics of change in Rural America”, doi
  25. (1998). The link between ability and specialization: an explanation for observed correlations between wages and mobility rates” doi
  26. (1999). The Low Pay Commission and the national minimum wage”, doi
  27. (1998). The Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis: A Review of Recent Studies and their Implications for Welfare Reform”. Housing Policy Debate, doi
  28. (2001). The State of the Countryside 2001, Countryside Agency, (The Stationary Office. London) doi
  29. (2001). Young people in rural areas: Socially excluded or not”, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.