Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Concise Process Improvement Methods



This thesis reviews two methodologies for process improvement; Six Sigma and the Shainin System. A strengthened methodology is developed following the 12-step Six Sigma DMAIC cycle with an added Shainin loop in the Analyse phase to narrow down sources of variation. This Hybrid Six Sigma framework is used to develop a sampling strategy known as the Process Variation Diagnostic Tool (PVDT). \ud The PVDT allows a Gage R&R and a Provisional Process Capability study to be carried out with just 20 samples. It also allows for an IsoplotSM and a Shainin Multi-Vari study. The method was then reviewed in three different industrial situations to demonstrate its effectiveness. Applying the PVDT allowed the project teams involved to quickly produce Gage R&R and Provisional Process Capability Studies. It reduced samples required from the combined 110 measurements from 60 products typically taken in industry to 60 measurements from 20 products. A significant advantage was the ability to extract a Shainin Multi-Vari Study from measurements taken for the PVDT. This technique allowed the project team the ability to categorise the most significant families of variation. From these case studies it can be seen that at the border of the Measure/Analyse phase in Six Sigma the proposed PVDT offers an efficient method of collecting Six Sigma metrics and steering the course of an improvement project. \ud A teaching vehicle known as the PIM game is introduced to demonstrate and facilitate the teaching of a number Process improvement Method. These methods are directly related to Six Sigma and Shainin methods developed in this thesis. The historical development and need for a teaching game are discussed. \ud Finally the thesis proposes a new method of destructive measurement system analysis (MSA). An industrial problem is used to benchmark the method against a traditional approach to destructive MSA. The project highlights when there is a second non-destructive test a conservative estimate of Gage R&R can be determined for destructive test equipment.\u

Year: 2011
OAI identifier:
Provided by: Durham e-Theses

Suggested articles


  1. (2007). A Bubble Mixture Experiment Project for Use in an
  2. (2004). A methodological comparison of three strategies for quality improvement,” doi
  3. (1999). A Pragmatic View on Process Capability Studies,” doi
  4. (1959). Compact, Two-Sample Test to Duckworth‟s Specifications,” doi
  5. (1990). Diagnosis with doi
  6. (2005). Gage R&R Studies for Destructive Measurements,”
  7. (1995). International Automotive Sector Group, QS9000: Measurement Systems Analysis.
  8. (2001). Looking Beyond Audit-Oriented Evaluation of Gauge Repeatability and Reproducibility: doi
  9. (1993). Managing Quality Improvement,” doi
  10. (2001). Six Sigma Black Belts: What Do They Need to Know?,”
  11. (2010). Six Sigma Quality: A Structured Review and Implications for Future Research,” doi
  12. (2004). Six Sigma: Myths and Realities,” doi
  13. (2000). Six Sigma:The Breakthrough Management Strategy Revolutionizing The World‟s Top Corporations, 1st ed. doi
  14. (1999). Spotting the Key Variables using Shainin‟s Variables Search Design,” doi
  15. (2008). Teaching Process Improvement Using a Virtual Manufacturing Environment,” doi
  16. (2005). The Big Book of Six Sigma Training Games.
  17. (2005). The Lean Six Sigma Pocket Toolbook: A Quick Reference Guide to 70 Tools for Improving Quality and Speed. McGraw-Hill Professional,
  18. (2001). The Multi-Vari Chart: doi
  19. (2000). The Six Sigma Way: How GE, Motorola, and Other Top Companies are Honing Their Performance.
  20. (2001). World Class Quality by Keki
  21. (2000). World Class Quality: doi
  22. (1991). World Class Quality: Using doi
  23. (1994). World Class Quality: Using Design of Experiments to Make It Happen by Keki R. doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.