Location of Repository

Prediction using panel data regression with spatial random effects

By Bernard Fingleton


This paper considers some of the issues and difficulties relating to the use of spatial panel data regression in prediction, illustrated by the effects of mass immigration on wages and income levels in local authority areas of Great Britain. Motivated by contemporary urban economics theory, and using recent advances in spatial econometrics, the panel regression has wages dependent on employment density and the efficiency of the labour force. There are two types of spatial interaction, a spatial lag of wages, and an autoregressive process for error components. The estimates suggest that increased employment densities will increase wage levels, but wages may fall if migrants are under-qualified. This uncertainty highlights the fact that ex ante forecasting should be used with great caution as a basis for policy decisions

Topics: HB Economic Theory
Publisher: Spatial Economics Research Centre (SERC), London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2008
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:33150
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles



  1. (1962). Best linear unbiased prediction in the generalized linear regression model’, doi
  2. (2006). Commentary – Immigration and its effects’, doi
  3. (2002). Economics of Agglomeration, doi
  4. (1988). Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and agglomeration economies in consumption and production’, doi
  5. (1984). Instrumental Variables, doi
  6. (2004). Models for spatially dependent missing data’, doi
  7. (2007). Panel data models with spatially correlated error components’, doi
  8. (1999). Panel data unit roots and cointegration : an overview’, doi
  9. (2006). Panel unit-root tests for cross-sectionally correlated panels: a Monte Carlo comparison’, doi
  10. (2006). Prediction in the panel data model with spatial correlation: the case of liquor’, doi
  11. (1990). Product variety, Marshallian externalities and city size’, doi
  12. (1996). Productivity and the density of economic activity’, doi
  13. (1999). Spatial autoregression techniques for real estate data’, doi
  14. (2004). Testing for PPP: should we use panel methods?’, doi
  15. (1998). The overvaluation of purchasing power parity’, doi
  16. (2007). The relative efficiencies of various predictors in spatial econometric models containing spatial lags’, doi
  17. (1999). The Spatial Economy : Cities, Regions, and International Trade, MIT press, doi
  18. (1998). Urban diversity and economic growth’, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.