Location of Repository

Spillover and backward linkage effects of FDI: empirical evidence for the UK

By Richard Harris

Abstract

Recent work (including that of the author) on the impact of FDI has been based on microlevel (i.e. firms, establishments or plants) data, since this allows much greater control when examining such issues as whether FDI plants are more productive or innovative; whether there are spillovers to indigenous plants from FDI; and whether foreign-owned plants can facilitate the building-up of clusters. The traditional approach (which is still prevalent in the literature) considers whether those industries and/or regions with the greatest concentrations of FDI experience higher productivity, growth, spillovers, clustering affects, but such analysis does not tackle the issue of cause-and-effect and therefore amounts to little more than observing correlations between the growth of FDI in an industry/region and the overall growth of the industry/region. If FDI plants are attracted to co-locate with better performing industries and/or ‘regions’ (to benefit from potential spillovers themselves), then this does not amount to FDI necessarily being the source of greater economic benefits. Thus the purpose of this review paper is to report on the empirical evidence for the UK (recent and historical) specifically related to: (i) FDI plants – are they ‘better’ (i.e. have higher productivity, or more innovative, etc)? And predicated on whether FDI is better: (ii) are there spillovers from FDI? Lastly, (iii) are clusters established around FDI plants? The limitations of this evidence-base are discussed and, together with the results reported in the literature, resulting in some key research questions that need to be addressed in future empirical work, especially at the spatial level in the UK

Topics: HC Economic History and Conditions, HG Finance
Publisher: Spatial Economics Research Centre (SERC), London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:33206
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (2007). An Analysis of Industrial Clustering
  2. (2002). Are there regional spillovers from FDI in the UK?, doi
  3. (2001). Characteristics of foreign-owned firms doi
  4. (1986). Cities and the Wealth of Nations. Vintage, doi
  5. (1998). Comparing Wages, Skills, and Productivity between Domestically and Foreign Owned Manufacturing Establishments in the United States’,
  6. (1999). Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Venezuela. doi
  7. (2007). Do Exporters Have Anything to Learn from Foreign Multinationals, doi
  8. (2004). Does Foreign Direct Investment Increase the Productivity of Domestic Firms? doi
  9. (2004). Does Inward Foreign Direct Investment Boost the Productivity of Domestic Firms? doi
  10. (1998). Dynamic Panel Data Estimation using DPD98 for GAUSS: A Guide for Users. available at http://www.american.edu/academic.depts/cas/econ/gaussres/regress/dpd/dpd9 8.pdf Arrow,
  11. (2006). Exploring the Detailed Location of UK Manufacturing Industries using Microgeographic Data, CEPR Discussion Paper No 5858. doi
  12. (2005). Exporting and productivity: theory, evidence and future research’, doi
  13. (2008). Exporting, Linkages and Productivity Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment, doi
  14. (2005). Exports versus FDI: An Empirical Test. doi
  15. (2006). Exports, Foreign Direct Investment, and Productivity: Evidence from German Firm Level Data. doi
  16. (1991). External Control and Government Policy: Some Further Results for Northern Ireland’, doi
  17. (2007). Firm heterogeneity, exporting and foreign direct investment’, doi
  18. (2007). Firm Level Empirical Study of the Contribution of Exporting to UK Productivity Growth.
  19. (2007). Firm location decisions, regional grants and agglomeration externalities, doi
  20. (2008). Foreign Direct Investment and Spillovers: Gradualism May be Better, doi
  21. (2005). Foreign Direct Investment, Spillovers and Absorptive Capacity: Evidence from Quantile Regressions, Deutsche Bundesbank Discussion Paper 13/2005. doi
  22. (2002). Foreign Ownership and Productivity in the United Kingdom -Some Issues When Using the ARD Establishment Level Data, doi
  23. (2007). Industrial Linkages and Export Spillovers from FDI, The World Economy, doi
  24. (2004). Industrial Policy and Its Effect on Total Factor doi
  25. (2007). International R&D Spillovers: Trade, FDI, and Information Technology as Spillover Channels, doi
  26. (1998). Is Learning by Exporting Important? doi
  27. (1979). Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Slowdown, doi
  28. (2007). Linking FDI motivation and host economy productivity effects: conceptual and empirical analysis, doi
  29. (1998). Location and the Multinational Enterprise: A Neglected Factor? doi
  30. (1988). Market Structure and External Control in the Regional Economies of Great Britain, doi
  31. (1997). Measuring and Analysing Fluctuations: The Importance of Building from Microeconomic Evidence. Federal Reserve Bank of St.Louis Review, Man/June
  32. (1996). Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis, (2 nd Edn.) Cambridge Surveys of Economic Literature, doi
  33. (1996). Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis, (2nd Edn.) Cambridge Surveys of Economic Literature, doi
  34. (2001). Of Hype and Hyperbolas: Introducing the New Economic Geography, doi
  35. (2001). On Economic Geography in Economic Theory: Increasing Returns and Pecuniary Externalities, doi
  36. (2002). One-Step and Two-Step Estimation of the Effects of Exogenous Variables on Technical Efficiency Levels”,
  37. (2003). Plants and Productivity in International Trade. doi
  38. (1991). Regional Economic Policy in doi
  39. (2004). Regional Policy and Spillovers from FDI in the UK, doi
  40. (2007). Spatial econometrics in RSUE: Retrospect and prospect. doi
  41. (2002). Spillovers and Foreign Direct Investment in doi
  42. (2005). Structural identification of production functions’, mimeo:
  43. (2005). Technological Spillovers, Agglomeration, and Regional Economic Development, doi
  44. (2003). Technology sourcing versus technology exploitation: an analysis of US foreign direct investment flows, doi
  45. (1988). The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: A Restatement and Some Possible Extensions. doi
  46. (1970). The Economy of Cities, Vintage,
  47. (2002). The Impact of Foreign Acquisitions on Total Factor Productivity: Plant-level Evidence from UK Manufacturing, 1987-1992, doi
  48. (2006). The importance of clusters for spillovers from foreign direct investment and technology sourcing, doi
  49. (1976). The International Operations of National Firms: a Study of Foreign Direct Investment, doi
  50. (2008). The long-run relationship between outward FDI and domestic output: Evidence from panel data, doi
  51. (2002). The rise of the creative class and how its transforming work, leisure community and everyday life. Basic Books, doi
  52. (1992). The Search for R&D Spillovers, doi
  53. (1954). Two Concepts of External Economies, doi
  54. (1999). Using the ARD Establishment Level Data to Look at Foreign Ownership and Productivity in the United Kingdom, doi
  55. (2007). What Causes Industry Agglomeration? Evidence from Coagglomeration Patterns, NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 13068. doi
  56. (2002). Why Foreign-Owned Firms Are Different: a Conceptual Framework and Empirical Evidence from Austria.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.