Location of Repository

The UK intranational trade cycle

By Michael Artis and Toshihiro Okubo

Abstract

The paper uses annual data on real GDP for the UK regions and 12 manufacturing sectors to derive regional and regional/sectoral business cycles using an H-P filter. The cohesion of the cycles is examined via cross-correlations and comparisons made with the regional cycles for Japan, the United States and the EuroArea. The UK emerges as especially cohesive and efforts to explain the overall cross-correlations of regional GDP are not very successful owing to the low variance of the explicand; when attention is turned to the sectoral/regional cycles, with their greater variance it is possible to demonstrate that economic variables such as distance, dissimilarity in structure and level of output play a significant role in explaining the variance in the cross-correlations. A significant feature of the cross-correlations in relation to those of EU countries is that whilst they continue to provide support for the “UK idiosyncrasy” they no longer do so as strongly as they did in earlier data sample

Topics: HC Economic History and Conditions, HF Commerce
Publisher: Spatial Economics Research Centre (SERC), London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:33211
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1998). (2001).Intranational business cycles in the United States, doi
  2. (2002). A complete model-based interpretation of the HodrickPrescott filter: spuriousness reconsidered, at http://www.bde.es/servicio/sof tware/tramo/mhpfmodel.pdf.
  3. (2002). A complete model-based interpretation of the HodrickPrescott filter: spuriousness reconsidered, at http://www.bde.es/servicio/software/tramo/mhpfmodel.pdf.
  4. (2003). A Tale of Two Cycles: doi
  5. (2003). A Tale of Two Cycles: Cofluctuations between UK regions and the Eurozone”, doi
  6. and J.Koo (2000) “Business Cycles under Monetary Union: a comparison of the EU and US”, doi
  7. and P.Winker (2005)”Using HP filte red data for econometric analysis: some evidence from Monte Carlo simulations”, doi
  8. and P.Winker (2005)”Using HP filtered data for econometric analysis: some evidence from Monte Carlo simulations”, doi
  9. (2006). Data sources and definitions 1. GDP and GVA data sets GVA: GVA data are taken from Cambridge Econometrics (Regional Economic Prospects,
  10. (2002). Dating th e Business Cycle in Britain”, doi
  11. (2002). Dating the Business Cycle in Britain”, doi
  12. (1993). Detrend ing, stylized facts a nd the business cycle”, doi
  13. (1998). Detrending and business cycle facts: A comment", doi
  14. (1998). Detrending and business cycle facts: A user’s guide", doi
  15. (1993). Detrending, stylized facts and the business cycle”, doi
  16. (1991). Geography and Trade. doi
  17. (2002). How much does international trade affect business cycle synchronization?”, Federal Reserve Bank of Texas Research Department Working Paper,
  18. (1995). Inter preting tests of the convergence hypothesis”,
  19. (1997). Interna tional and intranational business cycles”, doi
  20. (1997). International and intranational business cycles”, doi
  21. (1995). Interpreting tests of the convergence hypothesis”, doi
  22. (2001). l business cycles in the United States, doi
  23. (1998). Let’s get real: a factor-ana lytical approach to disaggregated business cycle dynamics”, doi
  24. (1998). Let’s get real: a factor-analytical approach to disaggregated business cycle dynamics”, doi
  25. (2002). On Adjus ting the HP Filter for the Frequency of Observations”,
  26. (1997). Postwar US Business Cycles: An Empirical Investigation’, doi
  27. (2006). Reg ional Income divergence in China”, doi
  28. (2006). Regional Income divergence in China”, doi
  29. (2006). The GDP data set for 17 European countries and the United States is taken from World Development Indicator (Edition
  30. (2007). The Intranational Business Cycle: Evidence from Japan”, CEPR Discussion Papers, No 6686.
  31. (1961). The Theory of Optimum Currency doi
  32. (2003). The United St ates as a Monetary Union,
  33. (2003). The United States as a Monetary Union, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.