Location of Repository

Analysing the impact of public capital stock using the NEG wage equation: a panel data approach

By Bernard Fingleton and Miguel Gómez-Antonio


This paper examines the relationship between the level of public infrastructure and the level of productivity using panel data for the Spanish provinces over the period 1984-2004, a period which is particularly relevant due to the substantial changes occurring in the Spanish economy at that time. The underlying model used for the data analysis is based on the wage equation, which is one of a handful of simultaneous equations which when satisfied correspond to the short-run equilibrium of New Economic Geography theory. This is estimated using a spatial panel model with fixed time and province effects, so that unmodelled space and time constant sources of heterogeneity are eliminated. The model assumes that productivity depends on the level of educational attainment and the public capital stock endowment of each province. The results show that although changes in productivity are positively associated with changes in public investment within the same province, there is a negative relationship between productivity changes and changes in public investment in other regions

Topics: HA Statistics, HC Economic History and Conditions
Publisher: Spatial Economics Research Centre (SERC), London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:33241
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles



  1. (1994). A multivariate time series analysis of the United States aggregate production function”, doi
  2. (1993). An assessment of trends in and economic impacts of infrastructure investment”
  3. (1999). Capital público e infraestructuras en la producción industrial regional,
  4. (1994). Capital público y productividad de las Regiones Españolas”, Moneda y Crédito,
  5. (2001). Capitalización y crecimiento”in: La Evolución Económica de las Provincias Españolas
  6. (2008). Determinants of log run regional productivity with geographical spillovers: the role of R&D, human capital and public infrastructure”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, article doi
  7. (1993). Does public capital affect private sector performance? An analysis of the Spanish case, 1964-1988”, doi
  8. (2000). Does public infrastructure affect economic activity? Evidence from the rural interstate highway system”,
  9. (2004). Economic geography and international inequality”, doi
  10. (1983). Government capital and the production function for US private output”, doi
  11. (1990). How does public infrastructure affect regional economic performance?”, New England Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of
  12. (2001). Increasing Returns versus National Product Differentiation as an Explanation for the Pattern of U.S.–Canada Trade”, doi
  13. (1995). Industrial location and public infrastructure”, doi
  14. (1991). Infrastructure and private sector productivity”, doi
  15. (1997). Infrastructure productivity estimation and its underlying econometric specifications: a sensitivity analysis”, doi
  16. (1996). Infrastructures and productivity in the Spanish regions”, doi
  17. (2006). Inversión pública y crecimiento: un panorama”,
  18. (1994). Is Government Capital Productive? Evidence from a panel of seven countries”, doi
  19. (1989). Is public expenditure productive?”, doi
  20. (1977). Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity”, doi
  21. (2007). Network infrastructure spillover in private productive sectors: evidence from Spanish high capacity roads”, doi
  22. (1994). New goods and index number: U.S. import prices”, Working Paper NBER, doi
  23. (1999). On the long run effects of public capital and disaggregated public capital on aggregate output”, doi
  24. (2002). Public and private investment in the United States and Canada”, doi
  25. (1991). Public capital and private sector performance”, doi
  26. (1996). Public capital and private sector productivity”, doi
  27. (1994). Public capital and public production in doi
  28. (1995). Public capital stock and state productivity growth”, doi
  29. (2006). Public infrastructure and Growth: New Channels and Policy implications, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, doi
  30. (1995). Public infrastructure and private production: measuring relatives contributions”, doi
  31. (2004). Public Infrastructure Investment, Interstate Spatial Spillovers, and Manufacturing Costs”, doi
  32. (2006). Public investment in transportation infrastructures and regional asymmetries in Portugal”, doi
  33. (1999). Public policies, regional inequalities and growth”, doi
  34. (1992). Public sector capital and productivity puzzle”, NBER Working Paper 4122, doi
  35. (2006). Putting new economic geography to the test”, doi
  36. (2008). Regional productivity variation and the impact of public capital stock: an analysis with spatial interaction, with reference to Spain”, Working Paper FUNCAS, doi
  37. (2006). Regional wage and employment responses to market potential in the EU”, doi
  38. (2007). Returns to local and transport infrastructure under regional spillovers”, doi
  39. (2004). Spatial Externalities and empirical analysis: the case of Italy”, doi
  40. (1995). Spatial productivity spillovers from public infrastructure: Evidence from state highways”, doi
  41. (2003). Specification and estimation of spatial panel data models”, doi
  42. (2003). Spillover effects of public capital formation: Evidence from the Spanish regions”, doi
  43. (1998). Spillovers and locational effects of public infrastructure”, doi
  44. (2008). Spillovers of private capital and public spending”, doi
  45. (2002). Technology, geography, and trade”, doi
  46. (1992). The contribution of publicly provided inputs to states economies”, doi
  47. (2003). The empirics of agglomeration and trade”, doi
  48. (2001). The growth of world trade: tariffs, transport costs, and income similarity”, doi
  49. (1954). The market as a factor in the localization of industry in the United States”, doi
  50. (1999). The Spatial Economy of Cities, Regions and International Trade. doi
  51. (1993). The Volume of Trade in Differentiated Intermediate Goods: Theory and Evidence”, doi
  52. (2005). Transport costs: measures, determinants, and regional policy implications”, doi
  53. (2005). Transport infrastructures spillovers effects and regional growth: evidence of the Spanish Case”, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.