Location of Repository

Productivity and firm selection: quantifying the "new" gains from trade

By Corocs Gregory, Massimo Del Gatto, Giordano Mion and Gianmarco I P. Ottaviano

Abstract

We discuss how standard computable equilibrium models of trade policy can be enriched with selection effects without missing other important channels of adjustment. This is achieved by estimating and simulating a partial equilibrium model that accounts for a number of real world effects of trade liberalisation: richer availability of product varieties; tougher competition and weaker market power of firms; better exploitation of economies of scale; and, of course, efficiency gains via the selection of the most efficient firms. The model is estimated on E.U. data and simulated in counterfactual scenarios that capture several dimensions of European integration. Simulations suggest that the gains from trade are much larger in the presence of selection effects. Even in a relatively integrated economy as the E.U., dismantling residual trade barriers would deliver relevant welfare gains stemming from lower production costs, smaller markups, lower prices, larger firm scale and richer product variety. We believe our analysis provides enough ground to support the inclusion of firm heterogeneity and selection effects in the standard toolkit of trade policy evaluation

Topics: HC Economic History and Conditions, HD Industries. Land use. Labor
Publisher: Spatial Economics Research Centre (SERC), London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:33249
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1990). A Primer on Robust Regression,
  2. (2002). Agglomeration and Trade Revisited, doi
  3. (2004). An Anatomy of International Trade: Evidence from French Firms, doi
  4. (2002). An estimate of the eect of common currencies on trade and income, doi
  5. (2002). An estimate of the effect of common currencies on trade and income, doi
  6. (1988). Completing the Internal Market in the European Community. Some industry simulations, doi
  7. (2009). Deeper, wider and more competitive? Monetary integration, eastern enlargement and competitiveness in the European Union, Economic Policy,
  8. (2005). Demystifying Modelling Methods for Trade Policy,
  9. (2008). Distorted Gravity: the Intensive and Extensive doi
  10. (2008). Distorted Gravity: the Intensive and Extensive Margins of International Trade, doi
  11. (2003). Estimating Production Functions Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables, doi
  12. (1999). Exceptional Exporter Performance: Cause, Eect, or Both?, doi
  13. (1999). Exceptional Exporter Performance: Cause, Effect, or Both?, doi
  14. (1999). Explaining the `border eect': what can we learn from disaggregated commodity ow data?,
  15. (1999). Explaining the ‘border effect’: what can we learn from disaggregated commodity flow data?,
  16. (2004). Export Versus FDI with Heterogeneous Firms, doi
  17. (1992). Global production eects of European integration,
  18. (1992). Global production effects of European integration,
  19. (2003). Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle, doi
  20. (2002). Illusory Border Effects: Distance Mismeasurement Inflates Estimates of Home Bias in Trade,
  21. (2004). Intra-national versus International Trade in the European Union: Why Do National Borders Matter?, doi
  22. (1998). Is Learning by Exporting Important? Microdynamic Evidence from Colombia, Mexico, and Morocco, doi
  23. (2005). Market Access in Global and Regional Trade, doi
  24. (2008). Market Penetration Costs and the Trade Dynamics, doi
  25. (2004). Market Potential and the Location of Japanese Firms in the European Union, doi
  26. (2008). Market size, trade and productivity, doi
  27. (1995). National borders matter: Canada-U.S. regional trade patterns,
  28. (2000). Non-Europe: the magnitude and causes of market fragmentation in the EU, doi
  29. (2008). Openness to Trade and Industry Cost Dispersion. doi
  30. (2005). Panel-data Estimates of the Production Function and the Revenue Function: What Dierence Does It Make?, doi
  31. (2005). Panel-data Estimates of the Production Function and the Revenue Function: What Difference Does It Make?, doi
  32. (2003). Plant and Firm-Level Evidence on New Trade Theories. In: doi
  33. (2007). PPPs for Industry Output: A New Dataset for International Comparisons, Research Memorandum GD-82,
  34. (2007). Product dierentiation, multi-product and estimating the impact of trade liberalization on productivity, doi
  35. (2007). Product differentiation, multi-product firms and estimating the impact of trade liberalization on productivity, doi
  36. (2007). Productivity and selection: Intra-national vs inter-national trade, doi
  37. (2007). Productivity and firm selection: Intra-national vs inter-national trade, doi
  38. (2000). Productivity and Turnover in the Export Market: Micro-level Evidence from the Republic of Korea and Taiwan (China), doi
  39. (2002). Productivity in a dierentiated product markets equilibrium.
  40. (2002). Productivity in a differentiated product markets equilibrium.
  41. (2008). Reallocation, Firm Turnover, and Eciency: Selection on Productivity or Pro doi
  42. (2008). Reallocation, Firm Turnover, and Efficiency: Selection on Productivity or Profitability?, doi
  43. (1996). Regional convergence clusters across doi
  44. (2006). Structural Identi of Production Functions,
  45. (2006). Structural Identification of Production Functions,
  46. (1998). Technical Barriers to Trade. The Single Market Review, Subseries III:
  47. (2008). The Dynamics of Firm-Level Adjustment to Trade Liberalization, doi
  48. (1996). The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry, doi
  49. (2009). The dynamics of trade and competition, doi
  50. (2007). The Happy Few: The internationalisation of European firms, doi
  51. (2007). The Happy Few: The internationalisation of European rms, doi
  52. (1996). The Inconsistency of Common Scale Estimators When Output Prices Are Unobserved and Endogenous, doi
  53. (2002). The Location of European Industry, doi
  54. (2006). The Log of Gravity, doi
  55. (2008). The Puzzling Persistence of the Distance Eect on Bilateral Trade, doi
  56. (2008). The Puzzling Persistence of the Distance Effect on Bilateral Trade, doi
  57. (1996). The Scope for Eciency Gains From Scale Economy Exploitation: Evidence From Panel Data,
  58. (1996). The Scope for Efficiency Gains From Scale Economy Exploitation: Evidence From Panel Data,
  59. (2005). The trade-creating eects of business and social networks: evidence from doi
  60. (2005). The trade-creating effects of business and social networks: evidence from doi
  61. (2008). To share or not to share: Does local participation matter for spillovers from foreign direct investment?, doi
  62. (2007). Total factor productivity estimation: A practical review, LICOS Discussion Papers. doi
  63. (2004). Trade and Productivity,
  64. (2006). Trade costs, and productivity, doi
  65. (2006). Trade costs, firms and productivity, doi
  66. (2002). Trade Liberalization, Exit, and Productivity Improvements: Evidence from Chilean Plants, doi
  67. (2008). Trade-Revealed TFP. doi
  68. (2008). Trading Partners and Trading Volumes, doi
  69. (2002). Unemployment clusters across European regions and countries, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.