Location of Repository

Where is the economics in spatial econometrics?

By Luisa Corrado and Bernard Fingleton


Spatial econometrics has been criticized by some economists because some model specifications have been driven by data-analytic considerations rather than having a firm foundation in economic theory. In particular this applies to the so-called W matrix, which is integral to the structure of endogenous and exogenous spatial lags, and to spatial error processes, and which are almost the sine qua non of spatial econometrics. Moreover it has been suggested that the significance of a spatially lagged dependent variable involving W may be misleading, since it may be simply picking up the effects of omitted spatially dependent variables, incorrectly suggesting the existence of a spillover mechanism. In this paper we review the theoretical and empirical rationale for network dependence and spatial externalities as embodied in spatially lagged variables, arguing that failing to acknowledge their presence at least leads to biased inference, can be a cause of inconsistent estimation, and leads to an incorrect understanding of true causal processes

Topics: G Geography (General), HC Economic History and Conditions
Publisher: Spatial Economics Research Centre (SERC), London School of Economics and Political Sciences
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:33581
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles



  1. (2010b). Perspectives on Spatial Econometrics: Linear Smoothing with Structural Models,Journal of Regional Science, doi
  2. (2004). A Bayesian Probit Model with Spatial Dependencies,in doi
  3. (2008). A Generalized Method of Moments Estimator for a Spatial Model with Moving Average Errors, with Application to Real Estate doi
  4. (1998). A Generalized Spatial Two-Stage Least Squares Procedure for Estimating a Spatial Autoregressive Model with Autoregressive Disturbances,Journal of Real Estate doi
  5. (2007). A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross-Sectional Dependence, doi
  6. (2008). A Spatial J-test for Model Speci against a Single or a Set of Non-Nested Alternatives,Letters doi
  7. (1999). A Spatial Prior for Bayesian Autoregressive Models, doi
  8. (2009). A Uni Solution to the Identi and Estimation of Social Interaction E¤ects,mimeo.
  9. (1990). An Illustration of a Pitfall in Estimating the E¤ects of Aggregate Variables doi
  10. (2010). Bootstrap Inference in Spatial Econometrics : doi
  11. (1974). Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior,
  12. (2009). Connections: an Introduction to the Economics of Networks. doi
  13. (2002). Economic Distance, Spillovers and Cross Country doi
  14. (2009). Endogeneity in a Spatial Context : Properties of Estimators,in doi
  15. (1970). Entropy in Urban and Regional Modelling. London: Pion. Spatial Economics Research Centre (SERC) London School of Economics Houghton Street London
  16. (2001). Equilibrium and Economic Growth: Spatial Econometric Models and Simulations, doi
  17. (2008). Estimating Spatial Models with Endogenous Variables, a Spatial Lag and Spatially Dependent Disturbances: Finite Sample Properties,Papers in doi
  18. (1975). Estimation Methods for Models of Spatial doi
  19. (1975). Estimation of the Coe¢ cients of a Linear Regression in the Presence of Spatial Autocorrelation: An Application to a Belgium Labor Demand Function,Environment and Planning, doi
  20. (1991). Geography and Trade. doi
  21. (1987). Goerge Norman and Chao-Shun Hung
  22. (2007). Growth, Technological Interdependence and Spatial Externalities: Theory and doi
  23. (2007). HAC estimation in a Spatial doi
  24. (2010). Hashem Pesaran and Takashi doi
  25. (1994). Health, Addiction, Social Interaction, and the Decision to doi
  26. (1992). Hierarchical Linear Models for Social and Behavioral Research: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Newbury Park CA: doi
  27. (2008). How to Get Rid of W: a Latent Variables Approach to Modelling Spatially Lagged Variables,Environment and Planning doi
  28. (1993). Identi of Endogenous Social E¤ects: The Reection Problem,Review of
  29. (2010). Increasing Returns and the Spatial Structure doi
  30. (2003). Increasing Returns: Evidence from Local Wage Rates in doi
  31. (2001). Interactions-Based Models,in doi
  32. (2009). Introduction to Spatial Econometrics. doi
  33. Julie Le Gallo and Hubert Jayet (2007). Spatial Panel Econometrics,in doi
  34. (2009). Knowledge Flows across doi
  35. (2002). Modeling Social Infuence through Network Autocorrelation: doi
  36. (1999). Multilevel Analysis: an Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling,
  37. (1986). Multilevel Mixed Linear Model Analysis Using Iterative Generalised doi
  38. (2010). Multilevel Modelling with Spatial E¤ects,mimeo.
  39. (1998). Multilevel Models for Analysing Social Data,in Encyclopaedia of Social Research Methods. Newbury Park CA:
  40. (2006). Multiple Groups Identi in the Linear-in-Means doi
  41. (2007). Network Analysis of Commuting Flows: A Comparative Static Approach to German Data,Networks and doi
  42. (2007). No Man is An Island: The Inter-personal Determinants of Regional WellBeing
  43. (1986). Non-nested Tests on the Weight Structure in Spatial Autoregressive Models, doi
  44. (2008). Omitted Variable Bias of OLS and Spatial Lag Models,in doi
  45. (1986). On the Measurement of Friend Behavior doi
  46. (2007). Panel Data Models with Spatially Correlated Error doi
  47. (1990). Peer Groups and
  48. (1986). Perceptions of Peer Pressure, doi
  49. Pesaran (2005). Alternative Approaches to Estimation and Inference in Large Multifactor Panels: Small Sample Results with an Application to Modelling of Asset Results,in doi
  50. Pesaran (2008). Random Coe¢ cient Panel Data Models, doi
  51. (2006). Prediction in the Panel Data Model with Spatial Correlation: The Case of doi
  52. (1979). Qualitative Methods for Analysing Travel Behaviour of Individuals: some Recent Developments,in
  53. (1993). Random Coe¢ cient Models.
  54. (1986). Random Group E¤ects and the Precision of Regression doi
  55. (1989). Restricted Unbiased Iterative Generalized doi
  56. (2002). Socio-economic Distance and Spatial Patterns in doi
  57. (2001). Sources of Sectoral Employment Fluctuations in Central Cities and Suburbs: Evidence from Four Eastern U.S. doi
  58. (1973). Spatial Autocorrelation.
  59. (1995). Spatial Correlation: A Suggested Alternative to the Autoregressive Model,in doi
  60. (1988). Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. The Netherlands: doi
  61. (2008). Spatial Growth Regressions: Model Speci doi
  62. (2002). Spatial Price Competition: a Semiparametric Approach, doi
  63. (1981). Spatial Processes: Models and Applications. doi
  64. (2003). Statistics for Spatial Data. doi
  65. (2006). Taking Personalities out of Monetary Policy Decision Making? Interactions, Heterogeneity and Committee Decisions in the Bank of England MPC,Centre for Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis Working Paper Series 0612, doi
  66. (2006). The New Economic Geography versus Urban Economics: an Evaluation using Local Wage Rates in doi
  67. (2005). The Role of Economic Space
  68. (2008). Using the Variance Structure of the Conditional Autoregressive Speci to Model Knowledge doi
  69. (1993). Workings of a City: Location, Education, doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.