Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Industry and the urge to cluster: a study of the informal sector in India

By Megha Mukim

Abstract

This paper studies the determinants of firm location choice at the district-level in India to gauge the relative importance of agglomeration economies vis-à-vis good business environment. A peculiar characteristic of the Indian economy is that the unorganised nonfarm sector accounts for 43.2% of NDP and employs 71.6% of the total workforce. I analyse National Sample Survey data that covers over 4.4 million firms, in both unorganised sectors – manufacturing and services. The empirical analysis is carried out using count models, and I instrument with land revenue institutions to deal with possible endogeneity bias. I find that buyer-suppler linkages and industrial diversity make a district more attractive to economic activity, whilst the quality and level of infrastructure are also important. I conclude that public policy may be limited in its ability to encourage relocation of informal firms

Topics: G Geography (General), HC Economic History and Conditions
Publisher: Spatial Economics Research Centre (SERC), London School of Economics and Political Sciences
Year: 2011
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:33592
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (2009). A contemporary perspective on the informal labour market: theory, policy and the Indian experience’,
  2. (2003). A Tractable Approach to the Firm Location Decision Problem’, doi
  3. (2002). Agglomeration and dispersion of highorder service employment in the Montreal metropolitan region 1981-96’, doi
  4. (1999). Agglomeration and land rents: evidence from the prefectures’, doi
  5. (2004). Agglomeration economies and productivity in Indian industry’, doi
  6. (2005). Agglomeration, transport and regional development in Indonesia’, Policy Research Working Paper No. 3477, World Bank, doi
  7. (2003). Concentration, spatial clustering and the size of plants: disentangling the sources of co-location externalities’, doi
  8. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative behaviour’,
  9. (1961). Contrasts in Agglomeration: New York and Pittsburgh’, doi
  10. (2003). Diversity Matters: The Economic Geography of Industrial Location in India’, Policy Research Working Paper 3072, World Bank, doi
  11. (1998). Economic Geography, industry location and trade: The evidence’, doi
  12. (1996). Equilibrium locations of vertically linked industries’, doi
  13. (1995). FDI in US Producer Services: A Temporal Analysis of Foreign Direct Investment in the Finance, Insurance and Real Estate Sectors', doi
  14. (2003). From the Help Desk: Hurdle Models’,
  15. (1997). Geographic Concentration of U.S. Manufacturing Industries: A Dartboard Approach’, doi
  16. (1987). Growth and change in the service sector of the United States: a spatial perspective’,
  17. (1977). Hawkers in South East Asia Cities: Planning for a Bazaar doi
  18. (2005). History, institutions and economic performance: the legacy of colonial land tenure systems in India’, doi
  19. (1959). How accessibility shapes land use’, doi
  20. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography’, doi
  21. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth’, doi
  22. (2005). Industrial Location and spatial inequality: Theory and Evidence from India’, doi
  23. (2004). Industrial Location Modeling: Extending the Random Utility Framework’, doi
  24. (1919). Industry and Trade,
  25. (2003). Instrumental variables, bootstrapping, and Generalized Linear Models',
  26. (1997). Instrumental-variable estimation of count data models: applications to models of cigarette smoking behaviour’, doi
  27. (1996). Inter-city competition for foreign investment: Static and dynamic effects of China’s Incentive’, doi
  28. (2007). IVPOIS: Stata module to estimate an instrumental variables Poisson regression via GMM, Statistical Software Components S456890,
  29. (2004). Market potential and the location of Japanese investment in the European Union’, doi
  30. (1989). Multinational Service Firms, Routledge, doi
  31. (2005). New Economic Geography, empirics and regional policy’, Working Paper no. 56, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
  32. (2005). Testing for localization using microgeographic data’, doi
  33. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing’, doi
  34. (1969). The Economy of Cities, doi
  35. (2005). The impact of business environment and economic geography on plant-level productivity: an analysis of Indian industry’, Policy Research Working Paper No. 3664, World Bank, doi
  36. (1983). The location and employment choices of new firms: an econometric model with discrete and continuous endogenous variables’, doi
  37. (2010). The location choices of foreign investors: a district-level analysis in India’, Working Paper No. 1628, Kiel Institute for the World doi
  38. (2003). The urbanization process and economic growth: the so-what question’,
  39. (2005). Trade costs and location of foreign firms doi
  40. (2006). Unorganised sector workforce in India: trends, patterns and social security coverage’,
  41. (2000). What are the determinants of the location of foreign direct investment? The Chinese experience’, doi
  42. (1979). Why new firms locate where they do: an econometric model’,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.