Skip to main content
Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

From vinyl to one/zero and back to scratch: 
independent Belgian micro labels in search of an ever more elusive fan base

By Bart Cammaerts

Abstract

In this article, the consequences for independently run micro-labels of new patterns of music consumption and -use, as well as the changes in the value being attributed to music by audiences are assessed. First, the emergence and diversity of independent labels is historically contextualised to then address the impact of technological change on the music industries, with a particular focus on independent labels. Second, the audience perspective is introduced by differentiating between the identities of the fan, the consumer and the (copy-right) user. Regarding the identity of the user, the gift economy is juxtaposed with the intellectual property regime and debates regarding the benefits as well as destructive nature of file-sharing and the use of internet platforms for the promotion as well as distribution of music. Interviews with three Belgian micro labels, active respectively in the industrial/experimental and alternative dance scenes, feeds into this analysis and will also provide the basis for assessing ways in which Belgian micro-labels are coping with these changing audience behaviours. A mixed picture emerges. Some independent artists, even from obscure genres, align themselves with the discourse of the mainstream music industry when it comes to file-sharing. Small-scale micro-labels in Belgium are also clearly struggling to invest in new productions, to break even, leading some to cease their activities reducing the diversity of music publishing, certainly in more obscure genres. Dance-oriented labels are more flexible and able to take advantage of the benefits the internet and digitalisation offers. Overall, the identity of the fan and building a dedicated fan-base, accumulating social and cultural capital, emerges as ever more important for small labels' survival

Topics: HD Industries. Land use. Labor, M Music
Publisher: Department of Media and Communications, London School of Economics and Political Science
Year: 2010
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.lse.ac.uk:33907
Provided by: LSE Research Online

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus. doi
  2. (2006). Bourdieu, the media and cultural production. doi
  3. (1995). Club Cultures: Music, Media and Subcultural Capital. doi
  4. (2002). Communication, Cultural and Media Studies: the Key Concepts - 3 rd Edition. doi
  5. (1980). Cultural Studies: Two Paradigms. doi
  6. (2004). Digital music and subculture: Sharing files, sharing styles. First Monday 9(2), see URL: doi
  7. (2009). Digital Music Report 2009, London: IFPI. ––––– Media@LSE Electronic Working Paper #20 –––– - 24.-Jenkins,
  8. (1999). Domesticating ICTs’, doi
  9. (2007). Exploring the Networked Worlds of Popular Music: Milieu Cultures. doi
  10. (2002). Fan Cultures. doi
  11. (2006). File Sharing: Creative Destruction of Just Plain Destruction, doi
  12. (2004). Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. doi
  13. (2007). Hacking Capitalism: The Free and Open Source Software Movement. doi
  14. (1999). Indie: The institutional politics and aesthetics of a popular music genre. doi
  15. (1975). Late Capitalism, doi
  16. (1996). Living room wars: rethinking media audiences for a postmodern world. doi
  17. (2006). Measuring the effect of file sharing on music purchases, doi
  18. Media@LSE Electronic Working Paper #20 –––– - 25.-Terranova, Tiziana (2000) Free Labor: Producing Culture for the Digital Economy.
  19. (1999). Music Genres and Corporate Cultures. doi
  20. (1985). Noise: the Political Economy of Music (trans. Brian Massumi). Manchester: doi
  21. (1981). Notes on Deconstructing 'the Popular'.
  22. (2005). On the reproduction of the musical economy after the Internet, doi
  23. (1997). Post-Punk’s Attempt to Democratise the Music Industries: the success and failure of Rough Trade. doi
  24. (1992). Producing Pop: Culture and conflict in the popular music industry. doi
  25. (2007). Rethinking the Music Industry. doi
  26. (1979). Subculture: The Meaning of Style, doi
  27. (1999). Subcultures or Neo-Tribes? Rethinking the Relationship Between Youth, Style and Musical Taste. doi
  28. (2004). The Challenge of Changing Audiences: Or, What is the Audience Researcher to do in the Age of the Internet?, doi
  29. (2003). The Changing Nature of Audiences: From the mass audience to the interactive media user. In Angharad N. Valdivia (Ed.) The Blackwell Companion to Media Studies. doi
  30. (1950). The Gift.
  31. (1997). The social shaping of information and communications technologies. In
  32. (1997). The Social Shaping of Information Superhighways: European and American roads to the information society, Frankfurt/New York: Campus Verlag and St.
  33. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. doi
  34. (2004). Towards a sociology of nonhumans: technology and creativity’, paper presented at the Social Change
  35. (2008). U.S. Music Purchases Exceed 1.5 Billion; Growth in Overall Music Purchases Exceeds 10%, press release, 31/12, see URL: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/2008-US-Music-Purchases-bw-13947245.html Oberholzer-Gee, Felix
  36. (2009). Understanding Society through Popular Music.
  37. (2003). Vertical and horizontal integration in the media sector and EU competition law. Presentation at seminar ‘The ICT and Media Sectors within the EU Policy Framework’,
  38. (2008). Vinyl Gets Its Groove Back,
  39. (2008). Vinyl Returns in the Age of MP3: LP and turntable sales grow as fans find warmer sound in classic format,
  40. (2006). We The Media: Grassroots Journalism by the People for the People.

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.