Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

Emerging institutional order? National Investment Funds in Poland

By M. Aluchna


This paper analyses the mass privatisation programme (MPP) implemented in Poland in the mid-1990s from the perspective of transition reforms and the development of corporate governance systems. Although the programme covered only 512 companies the collected evidence provides a unique opportunity to compare the Polish MPP to the schemes implemented in other post-socialist economies of the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Russia as well as to other privatisation methods applied in Poland. The Polish MPP created intermediaries in the form of National Investment Funds (NIF), which were granted the leading and minor status in the ownership of their portfolio companies. The clear ownership and the incentive structure appeared to be important mechanisms that helped minimse the control vacuum and stimulated restructuring and privatisation of the portfolio companies. Despite the restructuring efforts the financial results remain relatively blurred and the performance of privatised companies as well and the funds appear to be disappointing

Publisher: School of Slavonic and East European Studies, UCL
Year: 2008
OAI identifier:
Provided by: UCL Discovery

Suggested articles


  1. (2000). Building of a corporate governance system in Poland: Initial experience’,
  2. (2001). Competition and corporate governance in transition”, William Davidson Working Paper, no.
  3. (2001). Funkcjonowanie przedsiębiorstw w ramach grup kapitałowych na przykładzie Narodowych Funduszy Inwestycyjnych’, Uniwersytet Szczeciński,
  4. (2004). Ministerstwo Skarbu Państwa [State Treasury], Ocena przebiegu prywatyzacji majatku Skarbu Panstwa w
  5. (2004). Ministerstwo Skarbu Państwa [State Treasury], Raport z prywatyzacji NFI [Reports on NIF programme],
  6. (1998). Nikitin Georgiy, ‘Performance of Czech companies by ownership structure’,
  7. (1999). Privatisation and corporate governance: The lessons from securities market failure’, Columbia Law School, Center for Law and Economics Studies, Working Paper,
  8. (1997). Privatisation and restructuring in Central and Eastern Europe: Evidency and policy options’, World Bank
  9. (2000). Privatisation in transition economies: What happened? What comes next?’,
  10. (1997). Prywatyzacja’,[Prizatisation], Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN,
  11. (1999). Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
  12. (2001). Rapaczynski Andrzej, ‘The limits of discipline’,
  13. (1999). The Polish National Investment Fund Programme: Mass privatisation with a difference’, Working Paper,
  14. (1997). The role of government in economic development’,
  15. (2001). Transition economies: Performance and Challenges’, William Davidson Institute Working Paper,
  16. (2001). Tressel Thierry, ‘Competition and corporate governance: Substitutes or complements? Evidence from the Warsaw Stock Exchange’,
  17. (1997). Voucher privatisation with investment funds: An institutional analysis’, World Bank,
  18. (1999). Whiter reform?’,
  19. (2002). Wokół parkietu: NFI Hetman może zniknąć’ [Around the market. The NIF Hetman may disappear], Gazeta Wyborcza,

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.