Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

A study of lawyers’ information behaviour leading to the development of two methods for evaluating electronic resources

By S. Makri

Abstract

In this thesis we examine the information behaviour displayed by a broad cross-section of academic and practicing lawyers and feed our findings into the development of the Information Behaviour (IB) methods - two novel methods for evaluating the functionality and usability of electronic resources. We captured lawyers’ information behaviour by conducting naturalistic observations, where we asked participants to think aloud whilst using existing resources to ‘find information required for their work.’ Lawyers’ information behaviours closely matched those observed in other disciplines by Ellis and others, serving to validate Ellis’s existing model in the legal domain. Our findings also extend Ellis’s model to include behaviours pertinent to legal information-seeking, broaden the scope of the model to cover information use (in addition to information-seeking) behaviours and enhance the potential analytical detail of the model through the identification of a range of behavioural ‘subtypes’ and levels at which behaviours can operate. The identified behaviours were used as the basis for developing two methods for evaluating electronic resources – the IB functionality method (which mainly involves examining whether and how information behaviours are currently, or might in future be, supported by an electronic resource) and the IB usability method (which involves setting users behaviour-focused tasks, asking them to think aloud whilst performing the tasks, and identifying usability issues from the think- aloud data). Finally the IB methods were themselves evaluated by stakeholders working for LexisNexis Butterworths – a large electronic legal resource development firm. Stakeholders were recorded using the methods and focus group and questionnaire data was collected, with the aim of ascertaining how usable, useful and learnable they considered the methods to be and how likely they would be to use them in future. Overall, findings were positive regarding both methods and useful suggestions for improving the methods were made

Publisher: UCL (University College London)
Year: 2009
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.ucl.ac.uk.OAI2:14729
Provided by: UCL Discovery

Suggested articles

Citations

  1. (1989). A Behavioural Approach to Information Retrieval System Design.
  2. (1993). A Comparison of the Information-seeking Patterns of Researchers in the Physical and Social Sciences.
  3. (1993). A Mathematical Model of the Finding of Usability Problems.
  4. (1999). A Practical Guide to Usability Testing. Intellect Books.
  5. (2003). Academic Librarians’ Perception of LexisNexis.
  6. (2001). An Ethnographic Study of Technical Support Workers: Why We Didn’t Build a Tech Support Digital Library.
  7. (1988). An Investigation into the Information Behaviour of Academics Active in the Field of English Literature. Unpublished Masters dissertation,
  8. (1983). An Overview of Sense-making Research: Concepts, Methods, and Results to Date. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association,
  9. (2004). Analytical Usability Evaluation for Digital Libraries: A Case Study.
  10. (1980). Anomalous States of Knowledge for Information Retrieval.
  11. (2006). Claims Analysis “In the Wild:” A Case Study on Digital Library Development.
  12. (1986). Cognitive Engineering. In
  13. (1992). Cognitive Walkthroughs: A Method for Theory-Based Evaluation of User Interfaces.
  14. (1998). Contextual Design: Defining Customer-centred Systems.
  15. (2007). Creators, Composers and Consumers: Experiences of Designing a Digital Library. Baranauskas,
  16. (2001). Designing e-Books for Legal Research.
  17. (2000). Designing Intelligent Assistance for End-User Information Retrieval.
  18. (2005). Designing to Change Users’ Information-seeking Behaviour: A Case Study.
  19. (1988). Developing a Model of the Library Search Process: Cognitive and Affective Aspects.
  20. (2005). Digital Libraries’ Support for the User’s ‘Information Journey.’
  21. (2006). Ellis’s Model of Information-seeking Behaviour. In
  22. (1997). End-user Searching Behavior in Information Retrieval: A Longitudinal Study.
  23. (1986). End-user Searching in a Large Library Network: A Case Study of Patent Attorneys.
  24. (2008). Evaluating System Utility and Conceptual Fit Using CASSM.
  25. (2003). Evaluating Usability Methods: Why the Current Literature Fails the Practitioner.
  26. (1994). Executive Summary. In
  27. (2007). Find What You Need, Understand What You Find.
  28. (1992). From the Mind’s Eye of the User: The Sense-Making Qualitative-Quantitative Methodology. In
  29. (2000). Human Information Behavior.
  30. (2005). Implementing Digital Resources for Clinicians' and Patients' Varying Needs.
  31. (2007). Industrial Acceptability of Web Design Methods: An Empirical Study.
  32. (2000). Information and Information-seeking of Novice Versus Expert Lawyers: How Experts Add Value. The New Review of
  33. (1999). Information Foraging.
  34. (2001). Information Needs and Seeking Behaviour of Legal Practitioners and the Challenges to Law Libraries in Lagos,
  35. (1992). Information Needs of Solicitors. Unpublished MSc thesis,
  36. (2001). Information Search Process of Lawyers: A Call for ‘Just for Me’ Information Services.
  37. (2006). Information Seeking and Retrieval as a Leisure Activity. In
  38. (2001). Information Sources Used by Lawyers in Problem-solving: An Empirical Exploration.
  39. (2002). Information-seeking and Mediated Searching. Part 4. Cognitive Styles in Information-seeking.
  40. (2004). Information-Seeking and Students Studying for Professional Careers: The Cases of Engineering and Law Students in Ireland.
  41. (1992). Information-seeking Behaviour of Judges. Unpublished
  42. (1995). Information-seeking in Electronic Environments.
  43. (1991). Inside the Search Process: Information-seeking from the User’s Perspective.
  44. (2006). Just the Facts Ma’am?” A Contextual Approach to the Legal Information Use Environment.
  45. (1995). Learning and Using the Cognitive Walkthrough Method: A Case Study Approach.
  46. (1978). Legal Information of Solicitors in Private Practice. Unpublished MSc Thesis,
  47. (1984). Legal Information Sources, Services and Needs of Lawyers.
  48. (1993). Modeling the Information-seeking Patterns of Academic Researchers: A Grounded Theory Approach.
  49. (2005). Modelling the Information-Seeking Behaviour of Programmers – An Empirical Approach.
  50. (1996). Modelling the Information-seeking of Professionals: A General Model Derived from Research on Engineers, Health Care Professionals, and Lawyers.
  51. (1999). Models of Information Behaviour Research.
  52. (1995). Multidisciplinary Modelling in HCI Design… In theory and in Practice.
  53. (1996). Organizational Usability of Digital Libraries in the Courts.
  54. (1997). Organizational Usability of Digital Libraries: Case Study of Legal Research in Civil and Criminal Courts.
  55. (1984). Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data.
  56. (1991). Questions, Options, and Criteria: Elements of Design Space Analysis.
  57. (1996). Reflections on a Work-oriented Design Project.
  58. (2003). Retrospective vs.
  59. (2008). Scoping Usability Evaluation Methods: A Case Study.
  60. (2004). The Big Match - Lexis v Westlaw.
  61. (1994). The Cognitive Walkthrough Method: A Practitioner's Guide. In
  62. (1954). The Critical Incident Technique.
  63. (1987). The Derivation of a Behavioural Model for Information Retrieval System Design. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
  64. (1989). The Design of Browsing and Berrypicking Techniques for the Online Search Interface.
  65. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.
  66. (1990). The Effectiveness of Law School Legal Research Training Programs.
  67. (2001). The Evaluator Effect: A Chilling Fact about Usability Evaluation Methods.
  68. (1997). The Influence of Uncertainty on the Information-seeking Behavior of a Securities Analyst.
  69. (1999). The Information Needs and Seeking Habits of Lawyers in England: A Pilot Study.
  70. (1994). The Role of Attorney Mental Models of Law in case Relevance Determinations: An Exploratory Analysis.
  71. (1999). The Role of Experience in the Information Search Process of an Early Career Information Worker: Perceptions of Uncertainty, Complexity, Construction and Sources.
  72. (1995). The Trouble with Computers: Usefulness, Usability and Productivity.
  73. (2005). The Turn: Integration of Information-seeking and Retrieval
  74. (2000). Thinking Aloud: Reconciling Theory and Practice.
  75. (1998). Towards a Cognitive Theory of Information Retrieval.
  76. (1984). Training Wheels in a User Interface.
  77. (1994). Transferring HCI Modelling and Design Techniques to Practitioners: A Framework and Empirical Work. In
  78. (2008). Uncertainty-Tolerant Design: Evaluating Task Performance and Drag-Link Information Gathering for a News-Writing Task.
  79. (1993). Usability Engineering.
  80. (2003). Usability Evaluation of Digital Libraries.
  81. (1993). User Perceptions of CALR. Unpublished MSc thesis,
  82. (1992). Using Programming Walkthroughs to Design a Visual Language. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of Colorado at Boulder. Also available as University of Colorado at Boulder working paper
  83. (1995). Verbal Protocol Analysis. In

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.