Article thumbnail
Location of Repository

A prospective randomized pragmatic double-blinded comparison of 0.125% and 0.0625% bupivacaine for the management of pain after operation in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery

By F Duncan, J Cupitt, CA Haigh, P Vernon, J Marshall and A Nield

Abstract

Background: The aim of this prospective, pragmatic, double-blind, randomized controlled trial was to investigate the analgesic and adverse effects of two concentrations of thoracic epidural bupivacaine in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Our primary aim was to reduce the incidence of hypotension resulting from effective epidural analgesia. Methods: We studied 100 patients who were randomized to receive either 0.0625% bupivacaine or 0.125% bupivacaine, both with diamorphine, via a thoracic epidural. Dynamic pain was measured using a verbal ranking score and visual analogue scores. Results: No statistically significant difference was found between infusion rates or dynamic pain scores. A significantly greater number of patients receiving 0.125% bupivacaine, 63% versus 39%, were hypotensive on the day of surgery (p = 0.027). Thereafter, the trend continues but was not statistically significant. Conclusion: We were able to demonstrate that the incidence of hypotension was reduced with 0.0625% bupivacaine without affecting the quality of pain relief. However the overall incidence of hypotension remained high which restricted early mobilisation in some patients. Hypotension may be unavoidable when epidurals effectively control postoperative pain

Topics: R1, health_and_wellbeing
Publisher: Elsevier
Year: 2005
OAI identifier: oai:usir.salford.ac.uk:45
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ac... (external link)
  • Suggested articles


    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.