Location of Repository

Does education raise productivity, or just reflect it?

By Arnaud Chevalier, Colm Harmon, Ian Walker and Yu Zhu


It is clear that education has an important effect on wages paid in the labour market However it not clear whether this is due to the role that education plays in raising the productivity of workers (the human capital explanation) or whether education simply reflects the ability of the worker (through a signalling role). In this paper we describe and implement, using a variety of UK datasets, a number of tests from the existing literature for discriminating between the two explanations. We find little support for signalling ideas in these tests. However, we have severe reservations about these results because our doubts about the power of these tests and the appropriateness of the data. We propose an alternative test, based on the response of some individuals to a change in education incentives offered to other individuals caused by the changes in the minimum school leaving age in the seventies. Using this idea we find that data in the UK appears to strongly support the human capital explanation

Topics: Human capital, Signalling, Screening, Labor productivity--Effect of education on, Education--Economic aspects, Wages--Effect of education on, info:eu-repo/classification/jel/I20, info:eu-repo/classification/jel/J30
Publisher: University College Dublin. Institute for the Study of Social Change (Geary Institute)
Year: 2002
OAI identifier: oai:researchrepository.ucd.ie:10197/1104
Download PDF:
Sorry, we are unable to provide the full text but you may find it at the following location(s):
  • http://hdl.handle.net/10197/11... (external link)
  • http://creativecommons.org/lic... (external link)
  • Suggested articles



    1. (1994). Earnings effects of different components of human capital vs screening”, doi
    2. (1999). Education and employment status: A test of the screening hypothesis for Italy”, doi
    3. (1994). Education and Helath: Where there’s Smoke there’s an Instrument”, doi
    4. (2001). Employer learning and statistical discrimination” doi
    5. (1995). Estimates of the economic return to schooling for the UK”,
    6. (2002). Estimating the payoff to attending a more selective college: an application of selection on observables and unobservables”, doi
    7. (2002). Evaluating the impact of education on earnings in the UK: models, methods and results from the NCDS”, doi
    8. (1973). Higher education, mental ability and screening”, doi
    9. (1994). How widespread are sheepskin effects in the US?, doi
    10. (2001). Human capital vs signalling models: University access and high school dropouts”, doi
    11. (1973). Job market signalling”, doi
    12. (1998). On the w eak vs strong tests of thescreening hypothesis”,
    13. (1979). On the weak vs strong version of the screening hypothesis”,
    14. (1994). Schooling as human capital or a signal”, doi
    15. (1987). Sheepskin effects in the returns to education”, doi
    16. (1979). Signalling, screening and information”,
    17. (1979). Testing the educational screening hypothesis”, doi
    18. (2000). The causal effect of education on earnings”, doi
    19. (2000). The Incidence and Effects of Overeducation in doi
    20. (2002). The returns to education: evidence from the LFS on changes and differences”, Labour Market Trends,
    21. (1974). The screening hypothesis and the returns to education”, doi
    22. (1984). The screening hypothesis: an application of the Wiles test”, doi
    23. (2002). Variations in the returns to university degree in the UK, a Cohort Analysis.”

    To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.