Location of Repository

Validating the use of vignettes for subjective threshold scales

By Liam Delaney, Colm Harmon, Arthur Van Soest, Arie Kapteyn and James P. Smith

Abstract

Comparing self-assessed indicators of subjective outcomes such as health, work disability, political efficacy, job satisfaction, etc. across countries or socio-economic groups is often hampered by the fact that different groups use systematically different response scales. Anchoring vignettes have been introduced as an effective tool to correct for such differences. This paper develops an integrated framework in which objective measurements are used to validate the vignette based corrections. The framework is applied to vignettes and objective and subjective self-assessments of drinking behavior by students in Ireland. Model comparisons using the Akaike information criterion favor a specification with response consistency and vignette corrected response scales. Put differently, vignette based corrections appear quite effective in bringing objective and subjective measures closer together

Topics: Anchoring vignettes, Reporting bias, Hopit model, Microeconomics--Methodology, Scaling (Social sciences)--Methodology, College students--Alcohol use, info:eu-repo/classification/jel/C81, info:eu-repo/classification/jel/I12
Publisher: University College Dublin. Geary Institute
Year: 2007
OAI identifier: oai:researchrepository.ucd.ie:10197/580

Suggested articles

Preview

Citations

  1. (1974). A New Look at the Statistical Model Identification,” doi
  2. (2004). Cut-point Shift and Index Shift in Selfreported Health,” doi
  3. (2004). Enhancing the Validity and doi
  4. (2002). Health: perception versus observation,” doi
  5. (2006). New Evidence on Cross-Country Differences in Job Satisfaction Using Anchoring Vignettes,” doi
  6. (2006). Why Danes are Smug: Comparative Study of Life Satisfaction in the European Union,” doi

To submit an update or takedown request for this paper, please submit an Update/Correction/Removal Request.